Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast 92 vs 102

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2016 | 11:04 AM
  #21  
BrntWS6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 10
From: Land of the FOID
Default

I did the 92mm and ported it myself, picked up 20rwhp over the ls6 intake. I didn't want to deal with possibly hitting the water pump And having to change that too. My tuner said I probably would gain another 5 rwhp with the 102, I figured he would know since he dynos the things all the time.
Old 05-28-2016 | 07:34 PM
  #22  
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,604
Likes: 1,456
Default

The FAST 102mm LSXRT with 102 NW TB have been a major pain to deal with on my 3rd gen camaro with a 383 LS1. Lots of idle & stall issues that hurt drivability. Given my car is a driver, a FAST 92mm set up would have been better for daily driving in my case.
Old 05-29-2016 | 08:49 AM
  #23  
01Z0H6's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,630
Likes: 98
From: Hideaway Tx
Default

The major pain is not the 102 intake.. It's the NW 102 TB...

I run the FAST 102 / NW C5R (older version) 102 TB on my built 414ci Z06. It's perfect!

Getting ready to pick up a 92 for my SS.. Having a G5X2 installed this weekend, and my builder is porting,mil ing some 243's I picked up from a friend.

Some of my Vette buds have tried the MSD and all but 1 have scrapped it for the 102...


Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
The FAST 102mm LSXRT with 102 NW TB have been a major pain to deal with on my 3rd gen camaro with a 383 LS1. Lots of idle & stall issues that hurt drivability. Given my car is a driver, a FAST 92mm set up would have been better for daily driving in my case.
Old 05-29-2016 | 02:45 PM
  #24  
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,604
Likes: 1,456
Default

Happy yours drives perfect.

102 mm set ups seem harder to get right for driveability than the 92mm set ups, regardless of if it's the intake or TB to blame. I'm basing that on what both tuners have said that have worked on mine. Both worked with a lot of 102 LSXR set ups and 92 set ups.
Old 05-29-2016 | 03:07 PM
  #25  
quiet_storm98's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 20
From: Virginia
Default

Im kind of at this cross roads myself. Been thinking about picking up a fast but dont know if its worth it to go through all the trouble of installing a 102, sure it looks like it makes more power overall from what I've seen but having to buy all the extra stuff for just a few more hp is starting to look like it isn't worth it to me. With the fast 92 you can pretty much just bolt it right on
Old 05-30-2016 | 05:13 AM
  #26  
Exidous's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 3
From: Under a rock
Default

A 102mm TB is harder to tune especially on a DBW setup. The intake isn't nearly as big of an issue. I've run the 102 and 92. Both were very easy to tune in. A 90mm vs 102mm TB were day and night in ease of tuning. I'm on a SBE LS1 though.
Old 06-02-2016 | 02:28 PM
  #27  
ls6jay's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: clinton twp MI
Default

Ported lsxrt for me.
Old 06-02-2016 | 02:29 PM
  #28  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

Originally Posted by ls6jay
Ported lsxrt for me.
What vehicle do you have that on?
Old 06-02-2016 | 03:18 PM
  #29  
ls6jay's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: clinton twp MI
Default

Camaro. Cut cowl and cowl hood.
Old 06-02-2016 | 03:28 PM
  #30  
blk00ss's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 5
From: Jasper, AL
Default

Pics or it didn't happen.
Old 06-02-2016 | 03:43 PM
  #31  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

^^^ Yeah, I want to see it too. You don't see the LSxRT on many 4th gens. I think I remember reading somewhere where the LSxRT is worth an extra 10 to 15 HP over the regular FAST 102mm.
Old 06-02-2016 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
ls6jay's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: clinton twp MI
Default

I'm still in the process of putting the car together. Waiting on my Trans. Then I will install everything together. Sold motor mounts suckered sometimes.


Old 06-02-2016 | 04:47 PM
  #33  
ls6jay's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: clinton twp MI
Default

It's almost there

Old 06-03-2016 | 08:09 AM
  #34  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

Keep this thread updated once you've got it between the frame-rails. I want to see just how much you've got to cut on the cowl to get it to fit. Are you already prepared to lose the wipers, or do you think you can retain them?
Old 06-03-2016 | 09:07 PM
  #35  
ls6jay's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: clinton twp MI
Default

Will do
Old 07-09-2016 | 01:46 AM
  #36  
ls6jay's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: clinton twp MI
Default



Intake is just sitting on engine. Lsxrt in an fcar.
Old 07-15-2016 | 09:27 AM
  #37  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 83
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

But how much did you cut
Old 07-15-2016 | 11:27 AM
  #38  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
15 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 317
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Just a little history/info about the FAST manifold. The first Fast intake up to the 92 used the original design, which was by Wilson Manifolds. Hence the stamp on the intake. The 102 has a RHS stamp on it. I've always wondered if they just took the design by Wilson & put a bunch of little change/updates & called it their own? Or is it completely redesigned?
The two manifolds are actually very different when you take them apart. The 102 has individual bolt in runners while the 90/92 has an "intermediate shell".

FAST 90/92mm
Name:  SANY0003-4.jpg
Views: 4943
Size:  78.5 KB

FAST 102mm
Old 07-15-2016 | 12:02 PM
  #39  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

Thanks for posting that comparison KCS. That's how people are able to "modify" the individual runners on a FAST 102 setup. I know guys have shortened them. I just wish FAST was going to produce the interchangeable runners for the cathedral port platform.
Old 07-15-2016 | 01:44 PM
  #40  
dr_whigham's Avatar
The Scammer Hammer
15 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,710
Likes: 22
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

I'd spend some time sealing the individual runners on the 102's. I've heard from too many people "in the industry" that the way they're put together the actual runners themselves leak along the seams (where the halves of the runner meet).

I'd still take a 92 over a 102...


Quick Reply: Fast 92 vs 102



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.