Fast 92 vs 102
07-15-2016, 08:50 PM
#41
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
I think the 102 makes more hp, no doubt. That being said ive heard people add it to a combo that had the 92 and actually went slower at the track. Makes you wonder.....cause the real world isnt paper numbers.
09-09-2016, 08:54 PM
#42
On The Tree
09-09-2016, 08:58 PM
#43
On The Tree
09-10-2016, 08:51 PM
#47
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
Making power, and using it or putting it to the ground are two different things. Im sure you know this. I only stated what I had heard and believed. I just bit the bullet and traded my 92 for a 102. So i will have an absolute no changes other then intake track times comparison. I honestly don't know how its gonna turn out.
09-10-2016, 10:13 PM
#48
Making power, and using it or putting it to the ground are two different things. Im sure you know this. I only stated what I had heard and believed. I just bit the bullet and traded my 92 for a 102. So i will have an absolute no changes other then intake track times comparison. I honestly don't know how its gonna turn out.
09-13-2016, 03:03 PM
#50
From what I've seen, porting the FAST 92 is worth it, in tune of 10 to 15rwhp. As far as TB's go, most will say the Nick Williams is the way to go. I've never heard anyone complain about it, but I've been hearing good things about the WARR Performance TB's. They make them in 92mm and 102mm and they come in a variety of different colors.
09-13-2016, 06:15 PM
#53
09-14-2016, 07:37 AM
#54
My Mamofied FAST 92 gained 13rwhp and 4ft/lbs over the LS6 intake. No seat of the pants difference. If I could do it again I'd take the $$ from the Fast 92 and porting ($1500+) and put it towards some nice heads or a Nitrous Outlet system instead.
09-14-2016, 09:54 AM
#57
09-14-2016, 10:57 AM
#58
Originally Posted by 98cherrySS
This is with AI ported heads. I actually lost about 10hp and 5ft/lb between 3500-4500 RPM.
09-18-2016, 06:54 PM
#59
i just finished up my 102 install. it wasn't that bad, and I'm to leaving anything on the table.
so i had to buy ls3 rails for $75, and a rail spacer kit off eBay for 15. and i ended up buying a map pigtail to extend it to the front for another $8. the rails look nicer, and the 102 looks awesome. it all fit fine. is it tight? of course. but i have an extra working harness under the cowl for my lnc2000, plus a whole nitrous outlet set up, and it still all fit, plus it was my first intake swap.
so i had to buy ls3 rails for $75, and a rail spacer kit off eBay for 15. and i ended up buying a map pigtail to extend it to the front for another $8. the rails look nicer, and the 102 looks awesome. it all fit fine. is it tight? of course. but i have an extra working harness under the cowl for my lnc2000, plus a whole nitrous outlet set up, and it still all fit, plus it was my first intake swap.
09-18-2016, 06:56 PM
#60
From what I've seen, porting the FAST 92 is worth it, in tune of 10 to 15rwhp. As far as TB's go, most will say the Nick Williams is the way to go. I've never heard anyone complain about it, but I've been hearing good things about the WARR Performance TB's. They make them in 92mm and 102mm and they come in a variety of different colors.
i have the warr 102, waiting on a tune, seems like a quality piece. everything fit perfectly, and its a direct copy of a fast tb.