Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mid-length headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2016, 01:46 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
HighLiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Mid-length headers

What is the potential loss of running a set of mid length headers compared to full length? Both being of the same primary diameter and collector size.
Old 06-09-2016, 02:47 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

not worth it imo with most applications.
Old 06-09-2016, 02:58 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

^^^what he said
Old 06-09-2016, 03:23 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
HighLiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
not worth it imo with most applications.
Not worth it which way?
Old 06-09-2016, 06:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

Originally Posted by HighLiner
Not worth it which way?
power gains,cost and time ect.


just get a quality LT and be set.
Old 06-09-2016, 06:55 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
JustinZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
power gains,cost and time ect.


just get a quality LT and be set.
I agree, with the selection of longtubes out there today I really dont see a point of going with the mid lengths.
Old 06-09-2016, 07:35 PM
  #7  
Launching!
 
unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No potential loss over factory exhaust manifolds but very little, if any, gain. Bang for the buck just isn't there.
Old 06-09-2016, 08:46 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
HighLiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got it, Thanks guys.
Old 06-10-2016, 10:48 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Atrus_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I've seen this mentioned time and time again, but I wouldn't say there is no gain from the factory manifolds to midlengths. The MAC Mids were really highly regarded and seemed to put down good numbers, from what I have read.

I will be going with midlengths (Hooker Blackheart TD) because it's part of the system and retains (or improves) my ground clearance. If I didn't care about ground clearance and/or was just building a system from various components, sure, I would go with LT's. I guess my point is just that Midtube headers still provide a gain (from what I have read) over factory manifolds - it's just up to the purchaser to decide which meets their needs - cost, ground clearance, power gain, etc.

With any luck, we'll soon see how the Blackheart system performs. I had my stock car car baselined in 2014 - 312hp, 326tq. That was base with an SLP lid and EGR/AIR deleted - that's it. Since then I have added an LS6 intake, will be adding the full exhaust once it arrives (it's on order), and will have a tune done. I think we'll be having another dyno day in late July, at which time I can get the updated numbers.
Old 06-10-2016, 12:01 PM
  #10  
Teching In
 
2slowTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What you miss with mids is the exhaust scavaging of long tubes. You don't get the low and mid range torque. A well set up exhaust with mids are said to flow as well as the same set up with long tubes on the top end, though. That may be a plus with some cars that are traction limited.
Old 06-10-2016, 03:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Atrus_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Understood - just saying that the blanket statement of "they aren't worth it" isn't true. They DO provide a noticeable gain, although, LT's typically/theoretically provide more. Fitment/clearance both with the ground as well as the K-member are potentially sacrificed though. It's all about tradeoffs and optimizing what suits your needs best.

Consider it like the girlfriend limitation - pick only two...hot, cool, sane.
Old 06-10-2016, 04:09 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

imo they arent worth it. LTs for the most part fit fine with adequate ground clearance with little to no drawbacks.



just like a fat girl and a playboy centerfold. theyre both women and they serve the same purpose but you know which one youre better off choosing.

fat=mids

LTs=playboy centerfold.


Old 06-11-2016, 08:26 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
Ray455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have MACs on my car, but only because I got them for $100 at a time before there were so many sets of cheap longtubes floating around. With the mids only the car dropped about .2 in the 1/4 and picked up a few mph. Not saying they'd be worth it now, but they're not the absolute worst thing you could buy (at least not in 2007 lol)

If I had the drive to do another header swap I'd go 1 7/8 longtubes for sure, but for being a super simple budget bolt on car it's decently close to 11's as it sits. If it were to hit an 11.99 with pos mids and a 700lbs heatsoak ridden bbk intake manifold I'd be happy




Quick Reply: Mid-length headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.