LS6 valley cover or Catch Can
#1
LS6 valley cover or Catch Can
Can anyone tell me if it is better to run one version vs the other?
Currently have a 2002 WS6 that is getting heads/cam/intake done which will include a FAST 92 setup and was wondering if i should address the PCV system while im tearing down. Was going to purchase a mighty mouse can but was debating just changing the valley cover to a ls6 style (built in)
Any advise / recommendation would be appreciated as definitely do not want to work on this intake area more than once
Currently have a 2002 WS6 that is getting heads/cam/intake done which will include a FAST 92 setup and was wondering if i should address the PCV system while im tearing down. Was going to purchase a mighty mouse can but was debating just changing the valley cover to a ls6 style (built in)
Any advise / recommendation would be appreciated as definitely do not want to work on this intake area more than once
#6
if your car had an oil consumption issue before the LS6 valley cover will take care of most of it. i have both but probably didnt really need the catch can as it doesn't catch much and my IM is dry.
Trending Topics
#19
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
^ i didn't even catch that haha.
I have breathers on both of my valve covers and everything else is capped off, but I have thought about adding the ls6 valley cover, though I have never really had any issues with consumption that I am aware of. I still think it wouldnt be bad with my setup.
I have breathers on both of my valve covers and everything else is capped off, but I have thought about adding the ls6 valley cover, though I have never really had any issues with consumption that I am aware of. I still think it wouldnt be bad with my setup.