FAST 102 Stock LS1
Last year I put a TSP Torquer V4 in my car and couldn't be happier, it was the first mod I did to my Camaro. (it already had LT headers, 3" magnaflow exhaust, and high flo cats when I bought it)
Last Friday I talked with Derek from TSP to place an order for an intake manifold, TB, and gears.
I asked him which intake I should go with, the FAST 92mm or 102mm? He told me it depends, The 102mm is harder to tune, and will be a little more sluggish down low in the power.. He also said the 102mm is great if you are going with forced induction, and the other thing about the 102mm is clearance issues.. you will need to go with an LS2 water pump.
So it truly depends on your plans with the car, forced induction or not? and keep in mind the quirks with the 102mm. Good luck man!
Might end up with just a lighter wallet but my curiosity is really interested in out the outcome could be.
I would personally put it on along with a cam at the same time. Definately would not put it on by itself, its just not worth a $500 tune for a FAST intake only. Dont forget to make the most out of the FAST you need the bigger lid, bellows, maf and new wiring harness.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I would personally put it on along with a cam at the same time. Definately would not put it on by itself, its just not worth a $500 tune for a FAST intake only. Dont forget to make the most out of the FAST you need the bigger lid, bellows, maf and new wiring harness.
The cam could make 50-60rwhp more right now. The FAST will add 10. And maybe 20 with the cam AND heads.
So if I were starting to mod my car over, the FAST is the last thing I'd ever put on the car.
If I had a FAST in my possession and didn't want to spend more right now to go faster, the cam is the better bang for the buck. Even $3000 heads won't do as much as a decent sized cam....
A turbo setup will nickle and dime you to death and I've yet to be around one that wasn't high maintenance in some way.
Also for autox, backroad cruising, and road course type driving the power band and off/on throttle response is not something I would want to deal with.
They're great at what they do though but not the answer to every vehicle.
A turbo setup will nickle and dime you to death and I've yet to be around one that wasn't high maintenance in some way.
Also for autox, backroad cruising, and road course type driving the power band and off/on throttle response is not something I would want to deal with.
They're great at what they do though but not the answer to every vehicle.
OLD being your key word. I assume you missed the massive Huronspeed kit that was 2k right? A 400 turbo and 100 waste gate and you have a full kit. They're all over the place now. Not WANTING to go FI is simply not wanting a higher hp, better driving setup in a streetcar. You don't need hogged out heads that cost 2000 and large overlap cams and spend 10k to make 500hp anymore.
OLD being your key word. I assume you missed the massive Huronspeed kit that was 2k right? A 400 turbo and 100 waste gate and you have a full kit. They're all over the place now. Not WANTING to go FI is simply not wanting a higher hp, better driving setup in a streetcar. You don't need hogged out heads that cost 2000 and large overlap cams and spend 10k to make 500hp anymore.
The Gen III platform isn't as awesome as the Gen IV... but you know what people do? And what I recommend to people? Sell you stock motor. Grab an L33 5.3L from an 05-06 truck... since it's aluminum Gen III block with Gen IV internals. Throw a 76mm turbo on it. And make 800rwhp reliably.
Oh and it drives like a stock truck motor. With 800rwhp.
I have a thread where I talk through the options... 408+nitrous, D1+H/C, or a 5.3L+Turbo. The 5.3L+Turbo will run the hardest and make the most power. And drive the best. And it costs the least.
And the on/off nature of turbos... look at the options now. How you can set the exhaust housing, exducer, etc. You can make them spool like a madman. The added costs from turbos are the fuel system and drivetrain.











