180* or 195* thermostat
I see no benefit to a colder t-stat in a stock application. They will benefit from a colder air intake charge, but not necessarily from colder coolant temps (as intake heat soak is less problematic with a non-metallic, dry intake in the first place).
I see no benefit to a colder t-stat in a stock application. They will benefit from a colder air intake charge, but not necessarily from colder coolant temps (as intake heat soak is less problematic with a non-metallic, dry intake in the first place).
I don't ever recall seeing the stock LS1 PCM universally pull timing at the 19x°F coolant range (unless there's a specific condition causing KR, such as quality or octane issues with fuel), but I can't speak for other Gen III platforms.
Stock LS1s have often been known to run their best times when hot lapping - especially when coldest possible IATs can be attained using a sealed ram air setup. Assuming the OP's 5.3L is iron it might show positive HP response to lower coolant temps than an aluminum variant, at least potentially, but I can't imagine there would be much advantage when stock. Obviously, setups with ragged edge tuning (lean, aggressive timing) and/or forced induction are facing some different challenges, and will need to evaluate best coolant temps accordingly.
Trending Topics
That being said, if the engine doesn't ping or carry on the 180-185 thermostat should be just fine. There is some advantage in running close to the stock temperatures as that will hopefully get your oil warm enough to vaporize the fuel and water that is part of blow-by. Your oil will last longer and be better oil.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time











