Intake manifold for 6000-7800 rpm
Setup is a Turbo 4.8 that will be pushing high boost, 24-30 psi and will have a power range of roughly 6000 to 8000 rpm.
I don't know how badly the NNBS/TBSS intake manifold will hurt power at 7000 rpm versus a Holley Hi-Ram for example. Some have said the LS6 intake might be a surprisingly good option over the typical metal intakes up to 7500 rpm.
I don't know how badly the NNBS/TBSS intake manifold will hurt power at 7000 rpm versus a Holley Hi-Ram for example. Some have said the LS6 intake might be a surprisingly good option over the typical metal intakes up to 7500 rpm.
Jack Roberts (Squirrel tuned) ran an Edelbrock Pro Flo intake manifold when he made his stock 4.8 record 1/4 mike passes. It looks like the Btr Trinity makes a touch more above 6500 rpm versus the Edelbrock. Holley Hi-ram would be way too tall for my hood/application, but it looks like the Edelbrock is lower than the Hi-ram (and makes nearly identical power according to a Holdener video).
So on paper, it will be a choice between the Btr Trinity and Edelbrock Pro Flo. Assuming a TBSS intake manifold will heavily nose over by 7000 rpm versus the Trinity/Edelbrock, but have yet to see a direct dyno comparison.
So on paper, it will be a choice between the Btr Trinity and Edelbrock Pro Flo. Assuming a TBSS intake manifold will heavily nose over by 7000 rpm versus the Trinity/Edelbrock, but have yet to see a direct dyno comparison.
Last edited by Powerfield77; Jan 8, 2025 at 12:03 AM.
Trending Topics
Dyno graphs comparing intake manifolds are a bit unreliable when it comes to finding out where power falls off. A lot of that is based on the setup itself. A turbo setup is more likely to hold power better up top, and a different camshaft could have completely different results yet again.
My stock gen 3 truck intake manifold was still climbing in power above 7000 RPM in my old 4.8, but I very carefully chose my cam/turbo combo as well as header primary diameter/length/pairing etc to make sure everything worked right.
My stock gen 3 truck intake manifold was still climbing in power above 7000 RPM in my old 4.8, but I very carefully chose my cam/turbo combo as well as header primary diameter/length/pairing etc to make sure everything worked right.
Dyno graphs comparing intake manifolds are a bit unreliable when it comes to finding out where power falls off. A lot of that is based on the setup itself. A turbo setup is more likely to hold power better up top, and a different camshaft could have completely different results yet again.
My stock gen 3 truck intake manifold was still climbing in power above 7000 RPM in my old 4.8, but I very carefully chose my cam/turbo combo as well as header primary diameter/length/pairing etc to make sure everything worked right.
My stock gen 3 truck intake manifold was still climbing in power above 7000 RPM in my old 4.8, but I very carefully chose my cam/turbo combo as well as header primary diameter/length/pairing etc to make sure everything worked right.
226/232 110 LSA with 4 50mm turbos. Completely stock Gen 3 4.8 otherwise. Went 9.80 at just 9 PSI with a converter that was so tight it took me almost 8 seconds on the line to hit the 2 step limiter and I was dropping 2600-2800 RPM on the 1-2 shift, shifting at 7600. It would have had 9.50s at that boost level with just a converter swap. Crazy efficient setup.
226/232 110 LSA with 4 50mm turbos. Completely stock Gen 3 4.8 otherwise. Went 9.80 at just 9 PSI with a converter that was so tight it took me almost 8 seconds on the line to hit the 2 step limiter and I was dropping 2600-2800 RPM on the 1-2 shift, shifting at 7600. It would have had 9.50s at that boost level with just a converter swap. Crazy efficient setup.











