MAF Screen
If you want to take the screen out, there is a big snap ring outside the screen. Take the ring out and use a small pick to pull the screen out. very easy and no need to buy another MAF.
Just speculating. I haven't had the opportunity to test different scenarios with data loggers and tuning software. Maybe someone who has tuned a lot of cars and has seen different test cases will chime in...
at all calibrated, but using the same shop vac source
and measuring the vacuum level in the can, the stock
lid produced about 1/4"H2O drop, so did the screened MAF,
and the paper filters were well less. I expect the flow was
a small fraction of what the motor draws; don't concentrate
on the absolute numbers, just their relative weight.
Oh, and those ball-lickers over at WebShots dumped all my
photo howto albums, so don't bother following that link in
this thread:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-external-engine/70694-lid-o-rama-data.html
Screen increases small scale turbulence resulting in a flater velocity profile.
+ easier to calibrate MAF (less variability)
- increased pressure drop (lower mass flow efficiency AKA VE)
Sketched in 30 seconds
From an engineering perspective the screen is made to straighten out airflow as others have stated before. It IS needed on some vehicles with curved intakes (i.e. trucks and some other cars). However, on vettes and F-bodys the intake is pretty much straight, so you can get by without it. On the 02 Z06 and up GM eliminated the screen completely.
Descreening definitely will increase airflow compared to having it in. Air is a fluid. It experiences friction when flowing over something not moving. So all those little holes in the screen create lots of friction with the air passing by. In the case of a cylinder, the fastest point of fluid flow is in the center of the cylinder. As you move from the center out towards the walls the velocity of the air decreases and eventually reaches 0 at the wall of the cylinder; due to friction. So with the screen in you basically have all those little cylinders versus having one big cylinder with the screen out.
+ easier to calibrate MAF (less variability)
- increased pressure drop (lower mass flow efficiency AKA VE)
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
IF YOU ARE NOT TUNING DO NOTHING TO MAF it will change your air-fuel ratio.
The sensor reads air velocity at a specific location. If the profile is linear "flat" then it doesnt matter where the sensor is located. Its the same velocity everywhere.
However if the the profile is parabolic, sensor location greatly affects what it reads. Air velocity is higher at the center and zero at the outside. Unless the MAF sensor is calibrated for a specific velocity profile, it may read the wrong net airflow. Remember that air velocity and air flowrate are two different things. One is how "fast" the air travels, the other is how much air goes through.
Old school term for mass flow efficiency is volumetric efficiency (VE). The MAF screen hinders air from filling the cylinder. From a scientific standpoint, VE is a function of bore x stroke and remains the same regardless. Its always 5.7 liters. However, air density and mass flow efficiency determine final HP.
I still see no evidence pointing to the screen providing air flow manipulation.
Velocity x cross section area x density = mass
Done
IF YOU ARE NOT TUNING DO NOTHING TO MAF it will change your air-fuel ratio.

IF YOU ARE NOT TUNING DO NOTHING TO MAF it will change your air-fuel ratio.

Last edited by cicerofire; Mar 19, 2005 at 10:24 AM.
nonuniform in a way that happens not to matter,
then the screen is only a restriction.
If the intake tract biases the airflow then the sceen
fights that and stays closer to the "true" calibration
than without.
This is going to come down to cases, the lid in particular
on an Fbody is most of the intake tract and how it
shapes the airflow is going to matter to whether you
see a difference or not.
If you try it out in a nondestructive way you can always
go back if you don't like it. Aside from the sucking-up-
bolts thing, which is more a matter of hygeine.
The MAF is calibrated with the screen on . Did you monitor the trim in the PCM before and after the change? You need to do it on the same day because they will change day to day. The PCM will trim the change out(no screen) and you will never see it unless you look but the trims will change.
Velocity x cross section area x density = mass
Done
For some reason I just can't picure this. I looked that the 30 second sketch, but can't understand how mass changes that way. Maybe I'm confusing mass with pressure?
I thought --> density * volume = mass?
The sensor measures the mass of air that is going into the engine over time. This is in pounds per minute of air. What the PCM is trying to do is find out how much air is in cyl. If the MAF sensor is wrong the PCM will put in more or less fuel to get the air/fuel mix what it thinks it should be. The big part of what the senor measures is velocity of the air over time to get mass of air that goes into the engine over time. The mass of air has to be corrected for things like temp and density.


