





TB Bypass - anyone seen gains?
There probably is a legitimate reason for it in very cold weather but I live in Phoenix.
Steve The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
GM also put a skip shift feature on our cars, but you don't hear people praising it.
DMNSPD made the point about skipshift, how about PWM another great idea huh, Furd had engineers that said yeah 23psi is enough for truck tires and the list goes on. Manufacturers do a lot of things many of which have motivation far removed from the performance we seek from our cars.
If someone wants to do an easier test an infared temp gun pointed at the inlet and outlet of the TB coolant passeges would give some idea how efficient a heat exchanger the TB is, granted we wouldn't know volume but it would offer some insite.
The LT1 guys have been doing this mod since before the LS1 existed and they have no problems with it and I am sure there were even others before. If you are of the mindset that it wont help then wait till you have to disconnect the TB for cleaning or something to do it.
1 - It is there to make the air a little warmer for winter days - the coolant warms up quick and it will heat up the TB body. That makes the air less dense, not because GM doesn't like performance, but because EPA has a strangle hold on the auto industry.
2 - The bypass will only avoid the air to warm up a little. Colder air equals denser air which helps improving performance.
3 - No dyno, no SOTP from this mod alone. It's all a bunch of factors together. On a 110 degree day a TB bypass is useless. On "normal" temp days, the colder the air is, the better.
That's it.
It was probably the same brain that put a 7.5" rear end in a 5.7l V8.
Not everything that a car comes with from the factory is good for performance and/or necessary for your car to run right. Take top speed limiters for example. The dealer sets the top speed limiter to correspond to a given tire rating. The dealer doesn't want you to exceed the speed rating of the tire, have it blow and then deal with a lawsuit. If there were no speed limiters though how often would this really happen. I think the TB is similer. They don't want you to drive the car when it's 40 below and have the throttle plate stick open and then have a lawsuit. How often has this happened though....never.
And while I'm at it remove that resistor so the POS skip shift will operate again
C'mon guys, quit being a bunch of ****** about this TB mod. It might not give the performance of a lid, but it is a quick, easy, every little bit helps mod that is worth the time saved in the ease of future removal of the TB down the road. And I as well have operated my two LS1 vehicles in below freezing conditions with absolutely ZERO problems. It was probably the same brain that put a 7.5" rear end in a 5.7l V8.

Yeah, someone also got paid over 1 million a year to design the Geo Prizm. I guess by your reasoning, that means the prizm has a perfect design and can't be improved upon. Parts that were designed by "experts" get recalled ALL the time. Just because a part came a certain way on your car, does not mean that it can't be improved upon. If that was the case we'd all be driving slow, stock cars.
By the way, surgeons are "experts" in their field and don't always route their bypass's in the most optimal manor. Some patients end up with recurrent stenosis for this very reason. Somtimes the way a surgeon operates is dictated more by insurance and politics than pure inginuity. The same can be said for car manufacturers.
Last edited by Redneck Z; Aug 26, 2005 at 04:20 PM.




