Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2002, 10:02 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
94z'sson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: charleston sc usa
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

i have a 99 ss m6 and i want to get better airflow. i am looking at the K&N FIPK, but what does it replace? or i can go the route of a fast toys ram air kit,K&N filter,and whisper/direct flow lid. do any of you have ideas? i am not concerned about $$$ i just want the one that flows the best
thanks
94z'sson
Old 08-01-2002, 08:28 AM
  #2  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,254
Likes: 0
Received 1,687 Likes on 1,208 Posts

Default Re: k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

I would prefer the FTRA with a whisper lid over a FIPK. But that’s just IMO.

Having a WS6 I have no need for any type of under-bumper ram air. I’m using the BG ram air kit that makes a WS6 hood a real ram air setup and dumping that into a whisper lid. BG ram air will only work on WS6s though. If I had anything else but a WS6 I would probably get the FTRA or similar setup.
Old 08-01-2002, 08:38 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
StevieZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

I Atapped my car with both a lid(minus the FTRA) and the FIPK on the same day. With the exact same conditions and an extrerior temp of 70* , The FIPK showed 10 to 12 degrees warmer air intake temp at idle and took much longer to cool down (to the tune of a couple of miles) once the car was moving.
Old 08-01-2002, 11:47 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

That's easy. FTRA and a lid will easily out perform a FIPK.
Old 08-01-2002, 08:31 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
WeatherGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Freeland, MD
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

I made an infamous post back in Feb comparing the lid/FTRA versus the FIPK on my 422. Bottom line - with the hood closed the FIPK lost 25-30 HP across the entire powerband, while the lid/FTRA showed no change. Hood open they were about the same.
Old 08-01-2002, 08:51 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
00RedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Fl
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

It's all a matter of preference. The FTRA sucks everything from water to dirt and leaves up to the air filter. I constantly had to clean my filter when I used that FTRA/lid setup. When the car is moving cool air is circulated under the hood. The FIPK has more filter surface and does not lend to sucking water into the motor or blocking air going into the radiator. I have had both and currently have the FIPK. IMO they both increase performance over stock, one is a little safer than the other. My car pulls like a champ using the FIPK, it pulled well with the other also, it is just a matter of preference.

<small>[ August 02, 2002, 06:53 AM: Message edited by: 00RedZ ]</small>
Old 08-02-2002, 12:28 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
94z'sson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: charleston sc usa
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: k&n FIPK vs Fast toys ram air

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> thanks for all of the replies i believe that i am going ftra and a lid w/a K&N now my ss will breathe in better




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.