anyone dyno before true duals and after?
After true duals w/ x-pipe - 308 rwhp, 303 rwtq
However, I picked up 1.5 mph in the 1/4...?
In any case, I went beck to the y-pipe setup becuase the duals were WAY too loud and I do a lot of highway driving.
Also going from MAC's to LT's wasnt' much of a difference on his either.
also you will need an H or preferrably X pipe or you will lose power on the dyno. i dont know about the track. i have stuck with my ole 2.5" y-pipe - seems to make good power to me! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
<strong>face it, the MAC sound terrible, but flow great!
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Care do explain? so the LTs are deeper and sound better?
Drew
Before - Mac Headers (with CATs) and B&B Triflow
After - Dynatech headers (no CATs) with 2.5 true duals through Flowmasters
About a 14rwhp across the entire range. I do know the car responded much better at the track on the bottle though. I'd say 8-10 rwhp was through the removal of the CATs. So I'd say about a 5rwhp gain without considering CATs.
Trending Topics
Usually the ones I hear about are the ones losing power.
Surely, someone has had good results. I'd like to know too.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
now most that LOSE power are the ones that did not put a good x-pipe in the middle to create exhaust velocity and good pulse. otherwise it is not as good. still, not a great mod if you have a good flowing y-pipe!






