Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Underdrive pullys, which one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2006 | 09:37 AM
  #41  
RoastEmSS's Avatar
12 Second Club

 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Default

Get the Powerbond
Old 05-25-2006 | 01:10 PM
  #42  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by mean02Z28
I've had the March pulley on the car for about 2 years now - never thrown a belt. I'm very happy with it.

I favor the March pulley because it is an actual dampener, not just a pulley. Also, the extra weight of the March unit is irrelavant, as mentioned earlier, because it is rotational mass that matters. In the case of the March, the fluid in the pulley does not necessarily turn with or at the same rate as the body of the pulley. So really, the body of the pulley is rotating, with the fluid inside almost stationary - therefore not contributing to rotational mass.

Chris
Ditto on that one. A lot of poeple overlook the dampening characteristic of the pulleys. Being fluid dampned makes the March a superior piece. That is the main reason I got it, to control bad harmonics. The 25% underdrive is just a bonus IMO




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 PM.