Pacesetters vs Kooks.. any HP difference?
400hp+ i would say you should hit up kooks but if your just looking for something nice and enjoyable with a pretty good sound go with pacesetters.
my buddy has a 98 WS6 with pacesetters and corsa catback. ****** abnoxious!
it all your opinion and how much $$$ you got.
Why would a 150 shot help you lose power in the end? NO2 is safe if you know how to use it, and have the bottom end built for it. I know people who have been spraying a 150 shot weekly for years with no problems.
for 400hp+ as long as you have longtubes it really isn't going to matter what brand you have. Pacesetters are not going to restrict you over 400hp like you seem to think.

The Kooks y-pipes are hands down, the best on the market. I've installed their ORY on mine, and a catted y on a friends car, both have incredible ground clearance. If you spend the money on the Kooks, you'll be grinning from ear to ear. If you want to save some dough for other mods, you'll be more than happy with the Pacesetters.

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
with pacesetters you have an extra $500 to spend on something else performance wise
with kooks, makes your car lighter by removing an extra $500 from your wallet
Last edited by TheBlurLS1; Nov 28, 2006 at 11:37 PM.
I replaced headers all the way back. Had Pacesetter (1-3/4") with custom exhaust and gutted cats. Now have true dual 3" with 1-7/8 headers.
Old exhaust:

(The one with the oval tips.)
(The one with the Y-pipe and two cats.)New Exhaust:

Dyno:
(Blue is before Kooks, Red is after.) This looks like apples/oranges to me.
1) Tq @ 3k rpm increased by 40-50
2) Peak power carried out higher in the rpm much better. @ 6700 rpm the Kooks setup making 40 more whp.
wait for it...
wait for it...
This.









