Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pacesetters vs Kooks.. any HP difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2016, 07:44 PM
  #41  
On The Tree
 
South's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
There is far more going on in that graph then peak gains alone.

1) Tq @ 3k rpm increased by 40-50

2) Peak power carried out higher in the rpm much better. @ 6700 rpm the Kooks setup making 40 more whp.
This might be a dumb question, but I'm going to ask anyway. At what point would you shift for the two setups? Any advise?
Old 11-07-2016, 08:31 PM
  #42  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
scotty2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by South
It may be apples and oranges, but I thought it showed that the Pacesetter headers worked just fine. The gains had with Kooks were minor, for the cost.
Seems very minor. You should put the pacesetters back on.
Old 11-07-2016, 09:30 PM
  #43  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by South
This might be a dumb question, but I'm going to ask anyway. At what point would you shift for the two setups? Any advise?
Well the new setup definitely frees up more power up top and carries better. The kooks setup you could shift that combo @ 7k pretty easy where the old setup I would be shifting at 6700.
Old 11-08-2016, 06:22 AM
  #44  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
FIVEPOINT7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The comparison is next to useless. The only way this would help would be if the Kooks were also 1 3/4 primaries and the rest of the exhaust was the same.

Right now it's like swapping a Fram air filter for a K&N while you swap an LS6 intake for a Fast 90 and then saying the K&N made more power.
Old 11-08-2016, 06:58 AM
  #45  
On The Tree
 
South's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by FIVEPOINT7
The comparison is next to useless. The only way this would help would be if the Kooks were also 1 3/4 primaries and the rest of the exhaust was the same.
I shared what I had and I still think it shows the Pacesetter headers perform very well for the money. I saw very little difference, even with the entire exhaust changed over to Kooks.
Old 11-08-2016, 09:25 AM
  #46  
On The Tree
 
Ls1Ryan2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

IMO Pacesetters have done me great, I don't think the money is worth buying kooks, that my opinion and I know somebody will get upset. Yes, Kooks are one of the highest quality headers you have but the power gain is not worth the extra $$
Old 11-08-2016, 05:48 PM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

It depends how much you care about looks...I like my car to look great and like new. Kooks headers after 5yrs still look great. The Pacesetters I had on a different 4th gen started to look like **** after 2 years. Same thing with Hookers that were on my current car when I bought it...The coating starts to surface rust on the primaries and chip off on the collectors over time...Coated steel is a thing of the past. I would buy TSP stainless if on a budget.
The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (05-07-2020)
Old 11-08-2016, 05:59 PM
  #48  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,603
Received 799 Likes on 609 Posts

Default

Kooks has a nice catted Y pipe for those who deal with smog.
Old 11-08-2016, 08:36 PM
  #49  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

10 year bump...gotta be a record
Old 11-09-2016, 07:56 AM
  #50  
On The Tree
 
South's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BrntWS6
10 year bump...gotta be a record
Well, you can't say I didn't do a search!
Old 11-09-2016, 12:01 PM
  #51  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
It depends how much you care about looks...I like my car to look great and like new. Kooks headers after 5yrs still look great. The Pacesetters I had on a different 4th gen started to look like **** after 2 years. Same thing with Hookers that were on my current car when I bought it...The coating starts to surface rust on the primaries and chip off on the collectors over time...Coated steel is a thing of the past. I would buy TSP stainless if on a budget.
This comes down to personal preference but I know personally, I don't take my car to car shows, and nobody is looking at my headers while im racing the car, so why pay premium for looks. Kooks flows well and looks good no doubt, but the difference between a kooks header and a TSP stainless in the same size is price, HP wise its negligible and any variation in either brands direction can be attributed to the dyno. I wouldn't buy painted pacesetters as once the paint chips the headers fall apart from rust but im not afraid of other choices such as the stainless TSP or BBK. Ive ran both and had plenty of good results and years of use from either and never once regretted not spending a ridiculous amount more for a name brand.

Then again if you are big into engine bay dress-up or car shows then kooks may be what you need.

Last edited by usnfenix; 11-09-2016 at 12:07 PM.
Old 11-09-2016, 01:46 PM
  #52  
On The Tree
 
Ls1Ryan2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
This comes down to personal preference but I know personally, I don't take my car to car shows, and nobody is looking at my headers while im racing the car, so why pay premium for looks. Kooks flows well and looks good no doubt, but the difference between a kooks header and a TSP stainless in the same size is price, HP wise its negligible and any variation in either brands direction can be attributed to the dyno. I wouldn't buy painted pacesetters as once the paint chips the headers fall apart from rust but im not afraid of other choices such as the stainless TSP or BBK. Ive ran both and had plenty of good results and years of use from either and never once regretted not spending a ridiculous amount more for a name brand.

Then again if you are big into engine bay dress-up or car shows then kooks may be what you need.
Pretty spot on right there, if you are strictly for performance and are on a budget, pacesetters all the way. The very small gains that might be seen between the two is not worth the large difference in price. I do prefer to keep the engine bay of my car looking clean. A way to avoid rusting for as long as possible is sand down the headers till they are rough then put some high temp paint on them. Just a cheaper route than going that way. Some may not want to take the cheap route on there cars. IMO Pacesetters are best bang for your buck deal. Especially when on sale.
Old 11-09-2016, 02:54 PM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
This comes down to personal preference but I know personally, I don't take my car to car shows, and nobody is looking at my headers while im racing the car, so why pay premium for looks. Kooks flows well and looks good no doubt, but the difference between a kooks header and a TSP stainless in the same size is price, HP wise its negligible and any variation in either brands direction can be attributed to the dyno. I wouldn't buy painted pacesetters as once the paint chips the headers fall apart from rust but im not afraid of other choices such as the stainless TSP or BBK. Ive ran both and had plenty of good results and years of use from either and never once regretted not spending a ridiculous amount more for a name brand.

Then again if you are big into engine bay dress-up or car shows then kooks may be what you need.
I don't take my car to shows either, but I like my stuff to look nice. I never bought painted anything...I owned 3 sets of ceramic coated steel headers before switching... 450.00 for a header that starts to rust in a couple years does not seem like a good deal when I bought my 1 7/8 Kooks for 750.00 that will last a lifetime. so it was well worth the 300.00 for a premium header that excels in all metrics over the Pacesetter. I have owned 4 different brand of headers and Kooks by far bests Hooker, Pacesetter, BBK in fit and finish.

I agree TSP Stainless is a great option I just stated that previously. They also were not available 5yrs ago when I bought my Kooks setup and would not work with exhaust anyway.

Either way, its nice to have options and if you feel Pacesetters are right for you, then that is OK. Not hating at all...been there done that.
Old 11-10-2016, 10:43 AM
  #54  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
 
96darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Pacesetters here. Still look good and perform good.
Old 11-10-2016, 10:50 AM
  #55  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
I don't take my car to shows either, but I like my stuff to look nice. I never bought painted anything...I owned 3 sets of ceramic coated steel headers before switching... 450.00 for a header that starts to rust in a couple years does not seem like a good deal when I bought my 1 7/8 Kooks for 750.00 that will last a lifetime. so it was well worth the 300.00 for a premium header that excels in all metrics over the Pacesetter. I have owned 4 different brand of headers and Kooks by far bests Hooker, Pacesetter, BBK in fit and finish.

I agree TSP Stainless is a great option I just stated that previously. They also were not available 5yrs ago when I bought my Kooks setup and would not work with exhaust anyway.

Either way, its nice to have options and if you feel Pacesetters are right for you, then that is OK. Not hating at all...been there done that.

I would not get ceramic either, same reason for the painted pacesetters. I have had good experience however with the BBK chrome headers, yes they will turn blue after awhile but the fitment was amazing and tucked up cleaner than the stock exhaust did. TSP stainless with its newish velocity spike is a good choice for looks, with some added pain in installation.

What gets me is these car are not exactly new, header choices have been available for over a decade, and we still get the this vs that threads on here. IMO there are well known brands that are tried and proven out there, and in each category ( 1 7/8 and 1 3/4) the HP differences are basically nothing to worry about. People need to spend less time worrying about a potential 3 HP or whatever difference between 2 brands and focus on the build as a whole and choose parts based on what works well with each other.
Old 11-10-2016, 01:26 PM
  #56  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

This thread was from 10yrs ago when the "this vs that" was going on. South bumped the thread with his apples to oranges comparison. I only commented because I knew he was trying to imply that the pacesetter header and exhaust combo was close to the Kooks. I was just pointing out that the kooks setup show to be far superior...peak numbers don't mean everything. The Kooks setup makes far more low mid range tq and carries power out another 300+ rpm.

Then it turned back into "this vs that".
Old 11-18-2016, 10:26 AM
  #57  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
omc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 1,539
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
This thread was from 10yrs ago when the "this vs that" was going on. South bumped the thread with his apples to oranges comparison. I only commented because I knew he was trying to imply that the pacesetter header and exhaust combo was close to the Kooks. I was just pointing out that the kooks setup show to be far superior...peak numbers don't mean everything. The Kooks setup makes far more low mid range tq and carries power out another 300+ rpm.

Then it turned back into "this vs that".
It is difficult to find apples/ apples comparisons , because most guys do upgrades in groups of 3-4 parts at a time which clouds the picture of what part gives a select gain by itself. Its been debated over years between 1 3/4 vs 1 7/8 . Most that are buying new, now are going 1 7/8. Ten years ago I don't think Pacesetters even made a 1 7/8 LS1 header. A lot has changed in 10 years most for the better.
Old 05-07-2020, 06:32 PM
  #58  
Launching!
 
Alex-chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 200
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by South
I know this is an old thread, but I have dyno results comparing Pacesetter to Kooks and I'm going to share that here...

I replaced headers all the way back. Had Pacesetter (1-3/4") with custom exhaust and gutted cats. Now have true dual 3" with 1-7/8 headers.

Old exhaust:


(The one with the oval tips.)

(The one with the Y-pipe and two cats.)

New Exhaust:


Dyno:
(Blue is before Kooks, Red is after.)
Very noice! I was trying to decide between the kooks 1-3/4, and the kooks stepped 1-3/4-1-7/8 headers. We're you able to install the 1-7/8 headers with engine still in car? I am going to assume you have an LT1 engine?
Old 05-07-2020, 08:40 PM
  #59  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,867
Received 3,018 Likes on 2,349 Posts
Default

His Trans Am is an 02 which would have an LS1
The following users liked this post:
Alex-chevy (05-08-2020)
Old 05-07-2020, 10:31 PM
  #60  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Speed engineering FTW
The following 2 users liked this post by big hammer:
Alex-chevy (05-08-2020), Tyler Dietzenbach (05-08-2020)



Quick Reply: Pacesetters vs Kooks.. any HP difference?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.