Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4inch Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2006, 04:08 AM
  #21  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

What is wrong with the true dual setup?
Old 12-27-2006, 11:00 AM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
dirtytrucker+nurse05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how about single 5 inch?
Old 12-27-2006, 03:05 PM
  #23  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dirtytrucker+nurse05
how about single 5 inch?
You're going to be restricted by your header collector at this point. Since most (if not all) header collectors come in at 3", that is going to be a bottleneck of any system even if the piping is larger behind it.
Old 12-27-2006, 03:17 PM
  #24  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb MAF sensor restrictions

On an interesting side note, you can prove that the stock 75 mm MAF sensor is a restriction, using the above formulas:

Code:
75mm  =  790 cfm = 359 hp
85mm  = 1007 cfm = 458 hp
90mm  = 1131 cfm = 514 hp
Old 12-27-2006, 03:19 PM
  #25  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
Is this fwhp or rwhp?
I would assume this is fwhp (flywheel hp), because we are talking about the efficiencies of the actual engine and what airflow it can support.
Old 12-27-2006, 05:20 PM
  #26  
That's what she said...
iTrader: (8)
 
TheBlurLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nederland Texas
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
On an interesting side note, you can prove that the stock 75 mm MAF sensor is a restriction, using the above formulas:

Code:
75mm  =  790 cfm = 359 hp
85mm  = 1007 cfm = 458 hp
90mm  = 1131 cfm = 514 hp
Exhaust gas is a *slight* bit warmer, and less dense than incoming air wouldn't you say?

This means that for every cubic inch of incoming air, there is FAR more molecules than in one cubic inch of exhaust. This formula only applies to exhaust systems.
Old 12-27-2006, 06:32 PM
  #27  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That makes sense since I didn't take into account the density of the incoming air....to bad there isn't a formula for cold air I'd be interested to run some numbers through it. No wonder I was already loosing faith in the stock MAF sensor.
Old 12-28-2006, 11:38 AM
  #28  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
dirtytrucker+nurse05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This was origianally posted in "small block, big block specific". I didn't get any responses for a few days, so I tried in here. Specifically for a FI BBC 468 in a tube chassis trail rig. I don't have room for duals and I have a 3" exhaust kit but, I didn't think it would support the HP I will be making. That's why I asked about single 4". Thanks for all the responses, Mike
Old 12-28-2006, 09:18 PM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by TheBlurLS1
Exhaust gas is a *slight* bit warmer, and less dense than incoming air wouldn't you say?

This means that for every cubic inch of incoming air, there is FAR more molecules than in one cubic inch of exhaust. This formula only applies to exhaust systems.
Plus the exhaust has to deal with the gasoline that was used, which entered the engine from a different source. Those molecules have to come out the tailpipe too.
Old 12-28-2006, 10:51 PM
  #30  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
greysteel_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
woops nevermind I realize you have to divide by 2.2 in the final step...it's 2.2 cfm per hp not 2.2 hp per cfm...so here are the hp support numbers I get:

Code:
single 3"  = 369 hp
single 4"  = 656 hp
dual 2.5"  = 512 hp
dual 3"    = 738 hp

Is this fwhp or rwhp?
I think you were right the first time. From Theblurls1's post he's saying that each cubic foot of air that flows through the pipe supports 2.2hp, thus
for every hp produced the pipe needs to flow .4545.. cfm
1cfm=2.2hp
1127cfm=2479hp

I assume that formula holds true for only na?
Looking at the numbers a 4in pipe is absurd.
Old 12-29-2006, 02:49 AM
  #31  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
SSmokin 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dirtytrucker+nurse05
Thanks for the input. I was hoping someone would know some formulas to figure that out. TheBlurLS1 if your bored how about 5"? I think 656 will be over what I will be making but, I didn't think the Flowmaster 3" kit I have would do it, I was thinking Flowmaster said either 350 or 450 HP. I am hoping to be in the 500-550 HP range. Thanks again, Mike
Here's something for comparison.

Revised my 3" exhaust to 4" (lost 2psi). Made a more efficient inlet hat and gained back the 2psi + 1 deg timing. Gained +58rwhp/+63rwtq

Figure roughly +40rwhp/+40rwtq without the degree of timing.

Same boost, more efficient, more power.


614rwhp/537rwtq to 672rwhp/600rwtq

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/626013-procharger-346ci-58rwhp-63rwtq-new-inlet-hat-exhaust-1deg-timing.html

Last edited by SSmokin 01; 12-29-2006 at 03:13 AM.
Old 12-29-2006, 08:16 AM
  #32  
ss1
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
ss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scarborough, Maine
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Does it make a difference if you're talking about the ID of the exhaust as opposed to the OD? The exhaust gases are flowing through the inside of exhaust, not the OD.

I would think you'd take into consideration the thickness of the material and subtract that from the OD. Figure for 16GA tubing you lose ~.130" (.065" wall thickness) of the cross section.

I'm only mentioning this because I was figuring out the same stuff not too long ago.
Old 12-29-2006, 11:21 AM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
purdueranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Indy, IN
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the Mufflex single exit 4" cat-back with a flowmaster muffler. I love it.
Old 12-29-2006, 11:45 AM
  #34  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
You're going to be restricted by your header collector at this point. Since most (if not all) header collectors come in at 3", that is going to be a bottleneck of any system even if the piping is larger behind it.
Actually this is not true. There are two header collectors, therefore it would be 2 x 3", or 6" exhaust before the collectors become a restriction in this system.
Old 12-29-2006, 11:47 AM
  #35  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greysteel_M6
I think you were right the first time. From Theblurls1's post he's saying that each cubic foot of air that flows through the pipe supports 2.2hp, thus
for every hp produced the pipe needs to flow .4545.. cfm
1cfm=2.2hp
1127cfm=2479hp
I don't believe so because there's no way a dual 2.5" exhaust will support 2479 hp...I don't think Theblurls1 meant to say 2.2 hp per cfm, rather 2.2 cfm per hp, it makes more sense that way with the pipe numbers I quoted earlier.
Old 12-29-2006, 12:44 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
Actually this is not true. There are two header collectors, therefore it would be 2 x 3", or 6" exhaust before the collectors become a restriction in this system.
Wow.....
Old 12-29-2006, 03:27 PM
  #37  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Wow.....
Or Dual 3".
Old 12-29-2006, 06:10 PM
  #38  
ss1
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
ss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scarborough, Maine
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by lsx24
Actually this is not true. There are two header collectors, therefore it would be 2 x 3", or 6" exhaust before the collectors become a restriction in this system.
Old 12-29-2006, 07:14 PM
  #39  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss1
There are 2 headers, so therefore there are 2 collectors, and each one is 3", so the total restriction the collectors play is 3" + 3" = 6". Although I'm not sure the math comes out identical for each area (square inches).

As far as what is the equivilent pipe diameter that the start to become a restriction...

Just like 3" True Duals is 3" + 3", 2 header collectors are 3" + 3".
Old 12-29-2006, 07:51 PM
  #40  
ss1
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
ss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scarborough, Maine
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yeah, the math doesn't come out the same. You could almost fit two 3" OD pipes side by side in one piece of 6" OD pipe, and still have a bunch of area left over. I don't feel like doing the math right now though.

Maybe I just misunderstood what you were trying to say. No big deal.


Quick Reply: 4inch Exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.