Headers!!!!!!
I have heard that the fitment isn't the best and they tend to hang lower then most LT's.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
i think theres a sponsor on here in the classifieds selling hooker lts for about $400shipped. checkem out.
Jon
I'd been using the SLP LTs since they were introduced, and just like toplessZ stated, they were all that were available at the time...stainless steel & coated.
My Trans AM was stock height when the headers went in, they hung a bit low, but wasnt much of a problem. But them I went ahead and lower the car, about 1 1/2". I've been scrapping ever since.
After a few years of scrapping, they got beat up enough as to where I bought a new set of Kooks. They were just installed last week and they tuck up much nicer (compared to the SLPs).
The tone of the car is has changed, but still nice, and a ton of new found ground clearance! I have not re-dyno'ed the car for new numbers, but I doubt there was any HP gains, since I went with the 1 3/4" size (same as the SLPs).
If you're willing to fork out the money for SLP's, money obviously isn't an issue, so I would recommend QTP's. Their design is awesome and they make more power than practically every other brand out there thanks to their awesome merge collectors (the best in the business.)
Good fit and awesome ground clearance, too.
If you're willing to fork out the money for SLP's, money obviously isn't an issue, so I would recommend QTP's. Their design is awesome and they make more power than practically every other brand out there thanks to their awesome merge collectors (the best in the business.)
Good fit and awesome ground clearance, too.

Where do you get this stuff from? Every time I read one of your posts you are swinging on the nuts of QTP. Please explain your reasoning behind your constant rants. Have you even compared designs? The pacesetters are very similar to Hooker/Jethot headers. SLP headers advertise equal length primaries, but do so at the expense of a highway of bends and turns. Please show evidence that the QTP mass produced chinese collectors are better than other merge collectors on the market.
Last edited by BackinBlack02SS; Oct 18, 2007 at 02:55 PM.
What do you speak of "at the expense of bends and turns"? SLP longtubes are a longer header than some other brands. That is good. The longer the header the better. Do you know what the scavenging effect is? If you had a clue about the scavenging effect, you'd know that you need longer tubing in order to make power down low. Did you know shorty headers will make about as much power as longtubes way up top if it was possible for our engines to rev to 10,000 rpms? The longer the tubes of the headers are, the more power you'll make lower in the powerband. And equal length is ALWAYS better than non-equal length.
I've seen merge collectors compared with each other. Out of the high end headers, QTP, Kooks, Edelbrock stainless and ARH, the QTP collector is vastly superior to the Kooks for starters, no question. I'm not a big fan of the Edelbrock stainless headers because, I believe, they come in race only, the collectors are too big and would require the use of a reducer cone in most applications, they're not nearly as clean looking as the QTP's and they don't come fully welded I believe, not a big deal but it's just another thing that requires more time and effort. The only header that gives QTP's merge collectors a run for its money is the ARH collector, and the QTP collector, simply put, is put together better in every comparison I've seen. It's a larger merge collector with a smoother transition.
I say what I say because I've done enough comparisons and studied the competition enough. That's why I choose to support what I support. What's it to you? Care to prove me wrong in anything I've said? And do you have any proof the QTP's use "Chinese collectors"? Or are you full of ****?


