Problems with SLP 85mm MAF?
If you know the date of your previous trip to the track, you can compare the weather conditions of the two days. Go to http://www.wunderground.com/ and type in the zip code of the track you race at. Scroll down towards the middle of the page and you will see where you can enter a date and get the weather conditions of that day.
BTW, I have the SLP 85mm MAF and I gained .15 in the 1/8 mile track. But I also have LS1Edit so I have it tuned in for it.
Hope this helps, Becky
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
count both of the SLP variants as one). Z06, GMAF,
Pace and SLP (a worked-over truck MAF).
I have no problems with my SLP MAF ('02). Others
have different tales to tell. Any MAF that makes
your mixture lean, is bad news and you would have
to correct the side effects. One of which is low
demand signaling which makes the automatic
transmission soft-shifting when you need it to be
strong.
With Predator & SLP MAF I have put my WOT O2s
anywhere from 940mV to mid-800s. Certainly can go
lower, but who wants to go there? So we're not
talking any kind of lean bias here. On my near-
stock '02 there was no obvious difference from
the OEM MAF and that meant no tuning needed
(not to say the tweaking urge doesn't make you
go tune it anyway).
Totally different story from what you can hear
on ported MAFs, GMAF, etc. and I think '98-'00
SLP MAF may be more this way too.
If this business weren't all just a snake oil
sideshow the manufacturers would publish (or,
give you for the asking) decent frequency-flow
data or curves compared to stock and then the
consumer would have a clue what they're doing to
the car. But it's all just happy words that say
nothing, pretty much, at best. Buyer beware.
I'm happy as a pig with my used $85 SLP MAF.
Yeah, probably I'd be just as happy with stock.
Seen plenty of others spend more money and get
more headaches. Hell, you can get the headaches
for free with nothing but a Dremel tool and
some bad advice. Or, you can spend no money and
no time, and have no problems. But what fun would
that be?
I can swap them at the track and I don't see anything in MPH at all. Horse Pucky!!!!
Port your stocker and use the money that you would have spent to go toward tuning.
BTW, I think that looking at your MPH is a more consistant measure than your ET. Might be wrong though. Any different opinions?
Your engine setup looks pretty much like mine.
Since you have(?) wideband O2 data, can you
line that up against engine O2 sensor volts
for me? I'd like to get an idea of what my
O2 readings really mean and this looks like
a good calibration candidate.
If you had charts or tabular data that line
these up I'd love to get ahold of that info.
plus the transmission is affected considering torque management runs the drivetrain and torque management takes readings from the maf


