New dyno #'s after Fast92 install!!
New dyno #'s after Fast92 install!! There has been alot of posts on here regarding gains of fast 92 intakes on stock internal ls1's. Most people feel that it is too much intake. Well, they are mistaken! It made some serious gains over the factory ls1 intake. The car is a 2000 camaro ss with a m6. The first dyno pulls were with kooks long tubes, catted y, borla catback, slp lid, and a tune and the car made 326 hp & 334 tq. then we installed the fast 92 combo and re tuned it . the car made 345 hp & 355 tq !! The gains were 19 hp & 21 tq. The average was 19 hp & 17 tq !!!! It increased power evenly across the entire rpm range. The throttle response is also incredible. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TOO MUCH INTAKE! I will try to post the dyno sheets soon.
I'm impressed. Any way you could post up 2 of the graphs. The rumor is that those intakes kill low end torque on the small motors. So, what were the gains at like 3500-4200 on the torque side.
No need for a bigger MAF. I have the ported 92/92 combo and love it. Took nothing away from my low end, but from about 3500 RPM and up, it gained a good amount of torque and HP. Low end gained a bit actually, but nothing like the top end gained. Didn't lose anything down low for those interested.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
19 hp & 21 tq.
wow all that power for 12oo bucks....anyone else see this....im almost certain an ls6 intake and a good ported tb would net vlose to the same gains......IDK I just dont see it Ive seen to many 450+hp cars runnin much cheaper intakes
^^^Agreed, but for me, my tuner thought my LS6 intake was really holding me back for some reason. Maybe just old and dirty, but the ported 92/92 combo really woke up my set-up. Just my experience.
There has been alot of posts on here regarding gains of fast 92 intakes on stock internal ls1's. Most people feel that it is too much intake. Well, they are mistaken! It made some serious gains over the factory ls1 intake. The car is a 2000 camaro ss with a m6. The first dyno pulls were with kooks long tubes, catted y, borla catback, slp lid, and a tune and the car made 326 hp & 334 tq. then we installed the fast 92 combo and re tuned it . the car made 345 hp & 355 tq !! The gains were 19 hp & 21 tq. The average was 19 hp & 17 tq !!!! It increased power evenly across the entire rpm range. The throttle response is also incredible. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TOO MUCH INTAKE! I will try to post the dyno sheets soon.
Tech Resident
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
There has been alot of posts on here regarding gains of fast 92 intakes on stock internal ls1's. Most people feel that it is too much intake. Well, they are mistaken! It made some serious gains over the factory ls1 intake. The car is a 2000 camaro ss with a m6. The first dyno pulls were with kooks long tubes, catted y, borla catback, slp lid, and a tune and the car made 326 hp & 334 tq. then we installed the fast 92 combo and re tuned it . the car made 345 hp & 355 tq !! The gains were 19 hp & 21 tq. The average was 19 hp & 17 tq !!!! It increased power evenly across the entire rpm range. The throttle response is also incredible. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TOO MUCH INTAKE! I will try to post the dyno sheets soon.
The argument was never whether or not a FAST 92/92 would make more than an LS1 intake. Of course it will. No one has ever said that. Then question is, will it make more than an LS6 intake? The consensus is on a stock internals LS1, with an LS6 intake, you will make roughly the same gains for 1/3 of the price. You'd probably pick up low end with an LS6 intake. Why spend $1200 when you could spend $450 for the same gains if not more torque? That's the argument. The argument has never been LS1 intake vs. FAST.
Ahhhh, I would love to see a stock internal 346ci making 500rwhp.. If that's the case, I need to sell my heads and cam and go back to stock internals..
Maybe you need to check out the dyno results forum? What the heck would selling your heads and cam have to do with stock internals?
Tech Resident
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
We're not speaking about H/C cars, either. We're talking about 350rwhp cars.
Tech Resident
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Someone tell this guy heads and cam are internal engine parts 