Speed Inc. Does it again!!!
TECH Regular
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 474
Likes: 1
From: B'Ham Al
Originally Posted by LYNUS
There are many posts out there with a lot of secrets (weight of car, other mods not mentioned) that are held back
Congrats on the #'s,looks like you found a good combination.
Something's wierd with the dyno #'s for sure. I dynoed there with the 3200 vig UNLOCKED and got damn near identical #'s as yours, but my trap speeds were crap compared to yours- only 111.75 mph. I never had the car weighed, but it's a Z with the no T-tops, no spare,jack, tunnel brace, floor mats, etc...
You're obviously cranking out WAY more HP than the dyno shows- I put your racewitght and mph in an ET calculator and it came up with 440 RWHP for your setup. Did you remove the cats at the track? Either way congrats- you've got a wicked *** ride.
You're obviously cranking out WAY more HP than the dyno shows- I put your racewitght and mph in an ET calculator and it came up with 440 RWHP for your setup. Did you remove the cats at the track? Either way congrats- you've got a wicked *** ride.
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Elgin, IL.
Originally Posted by Roadrunner 45
Something's wierd with the dyno #'s for sure. I dynoed there with the 3200 vig UNLOCKED and got damn near identical #'s as yours, but my trap speeds were crap compared to yours- only 111.75 mph. I never had the car weighed, but it's a Z with the no T-tops, no spare,jack, tunnel brace, floor mats, etc...
You're obviously cranking out WAY more HP than the dyno shows- I put your racewitght and mph in an ET calculator and it came up with 440 RWHP for your setup. Did you remove the cats at the track? Either way congrats- you've got a wicked *** ride.
You're obviously cranking out WAY more HP than the dyno shows- I put your racewitght and mph in an ET calculator and it came up with 440 RWHP for your setup. Did you remove the cats at the track? Either way congrats- you've got a wicked *** ride.
