1000 dollars heads?
#21
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Town near you
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's wasn't hostile nor an attack, that my opinion from reading the board all day long. You 2 bash every head that doesn't cost a ton or come from Dart.
Last edited by 2000PewterZ28; 11-16-2008 at 10:13 PM.
#22
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Take a look at these comparisons:
PRC 2.5 5.3L Heads
MS3
FAST Intake/NW Throttle Body
447rwhp, 390ft-lbs.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...0-results.html
Stock LS1 Heads
Custom Cam (small compared to MS3)
LS6 Intake
421rwhp, 389ft-lbs
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
ETP215 Heads
FTI Streetsweeper Cam (236/240 111 - smaller then MS3)
FAST Intake/TB
511rwhp, 455ft-lbs
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...1rwhp-fti.html
All cars were manual cars. No torque difference between the Cam-Only and the PRC5.3 w/ MS3. The ETP heads with a smaller cam BLOW AWAY the PRC heads.
Now people are probably going to come in here and be like no **** sherlock. But the 5.3 heads are touted to be as good of heads as the big boys and flow charts are shown to push this idea. But flow charts are only part of what makes a head perform.
I think these guys would rather see you run cam only and have damn near the same performance (with the right cam of course - not a donkey dick); and save your money for some top end heads and suspension mods.
They are not trying to be "dicks", but unfortunately when people listen to all the spin and never keep an open mind; any information outside of the norm is considered trolling or whatnot.
Jesus, I know everybody wants to think that with $1,400 heads they can perform just as well as $2,400 heads. Hell I WISH that as well. But the fact is I haven't seen it yet...
The PRC heads are not "junk" and they are at a VERY good price for people that can't afford more expensive heads. But you pick a cam designed around the head/intake/exhaust not the other way around. The PRC heads IMO would perform much better with a smaller 228/232 type of cam instead of the MS3 that everybody wants to throw out there.
My 2c.
#23
When running bigger lazier ports like the PRC, you should tighten the LSA on your cam choice, at least according to Mike Jones of Jones Cam Designs. Maybe TSP would be better offering cams with these heads on a 110 LSA. or even a 108? The way Mike asked it:
When your port doesn't flow enough air, where do you see the biggest loss in power?
What normally happens to the power curve when you spread out the Lobe centers?
When your port is too big, where do you see it hurt the power?
What normally happens to the power curve when you tighten the Lobe centers?
We change the lobe centers to band-aid the port's problems.
When your port doesn't flow enough air, where do you see the biggest loss in power?
What normally happens to the power curve when you spread out the Lobe centers?
When your port is too big, where do you see it hurt the power?
What normally happens to the power curve when you tighten the Lobe centers?
We change the lobe centers to band-aid the port's problems.
#25
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very good info! that etp setup is gnarly but im sure i would have to sell a motorcycle to buy it lol. cam only would be fine as long as i could drive a similar setup first. my car is 100% daily driven, i do not want to have to work to drive my car anywhere, but i would still like to have gto power numbers under the hood.
#26
Prove them wrong rather then take shots. But I don't know if you will be able too.
Take a look at these comparisons:
PRC 2.5 5.3L Heads
MS3
FAST Intake/NW Throttle Body
447rwhp, 390ft-lbs.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...0-results.html
Stock LS1 Heads
Custom Cam (small compared to MS3)
LS6 Intake
421rwhp, 389ft-lbs
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
ETP215 Heads
FTI Streetsweeper Cam (236/240 111 - smaller then MS3)
FAST Intake/TB
511rwhp, 455ft-lbs
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...1rwhp-fti.html
All cars were manual cars. No torque difference between the Cam-Only and the PRC5.3 w/ MS3. The ETP heads with a smaller cam BLOW AWAY the PRC heads.
Now people are probably going to come in here and be like no **** sherlock. But the 5.3 heads are touted to be as good of heads as the big boys and flow charts are shown to push this idea. But flow charts are only part of what makes a head perform.
I think these guys would rather see you run cam only and have damn near the same performance (with the right cam of course - not a donkey dick); and save your money for some top end heads and suspension mods.
They are not trying to be "dicks", but unfortunately when people listen to all the spin and never keep an open mind; any information outside of the norm is considered trolling or whatnot.
Jesus, I know everybody wants to think that with $1,400 heads they can perform just as well as $2,400 heads. Hell I WISH that as well. But the fact is I haven't seen it yet...
The PRC heads are not "junk" and they are at a VERY good price for people that can't afford more expensive heads. But you pick a cam designed around the head/intake/exhaust not the other way around. The PRC heads IMO would perform much better with a smaller 228/232 type of cam instead of the MS3 that everybody wants to throw out there.
My 2c.
Take a look at these comparisons:
PRC 2.5 5.3L Heads
MS3
FAST Intake/NW Throttle Body
447rwhp, 390ft-lbs.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...0-results.html
Stock LS1 Heads
Custom Cam (small compared to MS3)
LS6 Intake
421rwhp, 389ft-lbs
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
ETP215 Heads
FTI Streetsweeper Cam (236/240 111 - smaller then MS3)
FAST Intake/TB
511rwhp, 455ft-lbs
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...1rwhp-fti.html
All cars were manual cars. No torque difference between the Cam-Only and the PRC5.3 w/ MS3. The ETP heads with a smaller cam BLOW AWAY the PRC heads.
Now people are probably going to come in here and be like no **** sherlock. But the 5.3 heads are touted to be as good of heads as the big boys and flow charts are shown to push this idea. But flow charts are only part of what makes a head perform.
I think these guys would rather see you run cam only and have damn near the same performance (with the right cam of course - not a donkey dick); and save your money for some top end heads and suspension mods.
They are not trying to be "dicks", but unfortunately when people listen to all the spin and never keep an open mind; any information outside of the norm is considered trolling or whatnot.
Jesus, I know everybody wants to think that with $1,400 heads they can perform just as well as $2,400 heads. Hell I WISH that as well. But the fact is I haven't seen it yet...
The PRC heads are not "junk" and they are at a VERY good price for people that can't afford more expensive heads. But you pick a cam designed around the head/intake/exhaust not the other way around. The PRC heads IMO would perform much better with a smaller 228/232 type of cam instead of the MS3 that everybody wants to throw out there.
My 2c.
And your right 2000pewter I'm not a TSP nut swinger. They have cheap prices that's about all I can say.
#27
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check out this fella's results with TSP H/C setup ..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/10-second...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/10-second...tml?highlight=
#28
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check out this fella's results with TSP H/C setup ..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/10-second...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...tml?highlight=
https://ls1tech.com/forums/10-second...tml?highlight=
No thank you.
You can get 10.9x in a Cam Only car at 420ish rwhp and a NICE torque curve. (230 ish size)
#31
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
im looking at patriot stage 2 ls6 heads and a 226/226 .585 .585 112 lsa comp cam. hoping for 430 rwhp horse in an m6 car, already has ls6 intake, lid, lt's, ory, smooth bellow.
anybody know if prc or any other company makes a head similar to this for cheaper than 1350 loaded like the patriot?
please dont flame, just lookin for info, if you know it i would be glad to learn it.
anybody know if prc or any other company makes a head similar to this for cheaper than 1350 loaded like the patriot?
please dont flame, just lookin for info, if you know it i would be glad to learn it.
Patriot has been around for a long time in this business. They seem to have a good reputation. I would look for quailty in a set of cylinder heads and pay a little extra for that quailty. Often we get what we pay for and it's worth paying a little extra for better parts & correctly set up springs etc. I've see a lot of car folks get burned in the long run by cheaping out of parts now to save a buck.
If your goal is 430rwhp and your considering their heads, I think you should call Patriot and ask for their recommendation for your cam. Keep a some extra money in your budget for tuning etc to get the most out of your set up and good luck with it.
BTW we all have our personal favorites when it comes to cylinder heads. So do your research and filter the opinions out before you buy.
#32
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also in this example they are using the G5x3 which IMO which looks to be a better match for these heads.
But regardless the smaller cam with the ETP heads put out 50ft-lb more at 3,000 and 50ft-lb more at 4,500. HP peak is 25rwhp at 200 less RPM.
I guess all i'm saying is that for spending 60% of the top end heads, I "personally" would just save up for them and the better performance. Other people will be happy saving the $$$ and content with the numbers it will put out.
But short of the shortblock you should ALWAYS buy the best cylinder heads that you can afford. Then match a cam to your cylinder heads.
#33
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is better, I didn't catch that. Thanks.
Also in this example they are using the G5x3 which IMO which looks to be a better match for these heads.
But regardless the smaller cam with the ETP heads put out 50ft-lb more at 3,000 and 50ft-lb more at 4,500. HP peak is 25rwhp at 200 less RPM.
I guess all i'm saying is that for spending 60% of the top end heads, I "personally" would just save up for them and the better performance. Other people will be happy saving the $$$ and content with the numbers it will put out.
But short of the shortblock you should ALWAYS buy the best cylinder heads that you can afford. Then match a cam to your cylinder heads.
Also in this example they are using the G5x3 which IMO which looks to be a better match for these heads.
But regardless the smaller cam with the ETP heads put out 50ft-lb more at 3,000 and 50ft-lb more at 4,500. HP peak is 25rwhp at 200 less RPM.
I guess all i'm saying is that for spending 60% of the top end heads, I "personally" would just save up for them and the better performance. Other people will be happy saving the $$$ and content with the numbers it will put out.
But short of the shortblock you should ALWAYS buy the best cylinder heads that you can afford. Then match a cam to your cylinder heads.
Dyno wise yes better performance , haven't seen any track results though from that car .
MT Everest trapped 130mph .
#34
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ya im sure i could just drop a t rex in my motor and make all kinds of power, but all kinds of power between 5-7 grand. thats not my idea of street friendly power. im gonna look into getting a set of 5.3's ported for now and get a cam spec'd by someone. i have a tuner so thats taken care of. that ms3 sure is looking better and better