Ms3 Cam only numbers
Ms3 Cam only numbers Here are the dynojet numbers from getting tuned last Tuesday. It's MS3 cam with mods in sig and fram paper air filter. Let me know what you think? The red lines are after the cam and the blue ones are tuned with headers.
Great results! I'd love to see that car with a set of PRC215s & a fast ported intake combo. I bet she's capable of 480+rwhp easy with that kind of combo!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
nice numbers man! MS3 F T W ! ! ! ! whats the lsa on yours? would a 113 vs a 112 see a diff??? i put down 415RWHP and 392TQ almost same mods just on a 113 lsa and i still have the stock gears on a m6... i also have the fast 90.90 what intake do you have?
jesus, the stock cam was making 315whp @ 1800rpm? dayum. lt1 what?
nice peak numbers, appears you lost a ****-ton of midrange torque. i guess with those 410s you won't notice much a difference. what rpm does the engine fall back to after making a shift @ 6500? graph looks peaky.
nice peak numbers, appears you lost a ****-ton of midrange torque. i guess with those 410s you won't notice much a difference. what rpm does the engine fall back to after making a shift @ 6500? graph looks peaky.
Trending Topics
If you get some time send me over a copy of your tune. I bet I can clear up the losses down low, judging by the graph there's a few things we can do to the tune that I bet will clear it up!!! 
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Jon
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
All it needs is more mods: Heads, intake, MAF and more compression to reach its potential.
That graph doesn't lie, looks like tuning can be tweaked a bit.
Fully supported it can achieve great numbers, cam only is not its "forte" (loss in Trq/Hp till 3600 rpm)
Good Roll racer
That graph doesn't lie, looks like tuning can be tweaked a bit.
Fully supported it can achieve great numbers, cam only is not its "forte" (loss in Trq/Hp till 3600 rpm)
Good Roll racer
No, I do not notice a loss in power anywhere. The car is a daily driver and if I am driving around below 4000 rpm "not racing" them I don't need the power anyway. The only time I would use the power is if I were racing. When I am racing every time I shift the rpm's would be above 4000.
wow...something isn't right with that low end....or at least i hope there is!
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
wow...something isn't right with that low end....or at least i hope there is!
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
wow...something isn't right with that low end....or at least i hope there is!
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
**** my 233 cam made 330# torque at 3000rpm, compared to your 290# or so.
and you only made about 8# more torque at peak then mine, but you made about 30hp more peak.
and to think you probably gained some torque due to the light flywheel setup. granted you're offsetting that with heavy *** 315s
really need to get a new graph of my setup. planning to after i put the ported FAST on.
nice work on the car, and remember dyno is for internet bragging.....the proof is in the way the car drives and if YOU are happy with it.
