Replaced timing chain and still LOTS of SLACK.....
Phil
Phil
Stock chain = sucks
A number of people over the years have said "well as long as its within GM specs"
......to me that shows either lack of knowledge ("GM says it would work....durrrr...."
) or they really don't have any interest in getting the maximum performance out of their engine. The stock chain and sprockets result in A LOT of slack (after 25K miles, there was so much slack in the stock chain that I could MOVE the cam
). For this reason, I upgraded to the double roller version. Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Stock chain = suck
Lingenfelter twin turbo = stock chain
CR5 Le Mans = stock chain.
Stock chain is fine and has no more failures than any other after market.
Too tight as double rollers are are starting to show premature front cam bearing wear from multiple users all over.
My 2 Bits
is just replacing the chain with the cloyes chain good enough? Im guessing the farthest i will get with this motor is around 450rwhp, with a H/C 347
and is the Damper ScottTurveys talking about allready used, from the factory on our LS1's, or is it an additional item that would help?
is just replacing the chain with the cloyes chain good enough? Im guessing the farthest i will get with this motor is around 450rwhp, with a H/C 347
and is the Damper ScottTurveys talking about allready used, from the factory on our LS1's, or is it an additional item that would help?
BUT....
The valve events are still mechanically timed. Slack in the chain WILL cause the cam to retard a little. How much performance is lost will depend on how bad the chain is (or how the cam/engine combination is). It is possible that the motor could use a little retarding in the cam timing and as such the car would actually pick up a little hp (thus people say "look....it didn’t hurt...I made hp with the stock chain").
Aftermarket engine builders use the stock chain as a "base" piece (they have to give you one so they give you the cheap one). The heavy-duty singles and duels are an upgrade. Sure the stock chain will "work" (people get 100+K miles out of them) but I can’t see using anything less than top quality parts in a performance oriented motor (especially when it does not cost a whole lot more).

-Electronic fuel and ignition timing: we can agree on that, there's no need to get into it.
-Mechanical valve timing: you betcha.. Now, everyone (besides me) raise your hand if you've degreed a cam in a new shortblock back-to-back with the stock timing set and then with a rollmaster double (or equivalent aftermarket chain). Once you document for yourself the timing of the valve events for each timing set, and you have the numbers in front of you, if you still want to bicker about it, come back. I think you'll be surprised.
Also, what worries you more, 1 degree of retard, or milling the crap out of your cam bearings until you finally shatter your cam into about 5 pieces?
Good luck with the thread... I've been round and round with this too many times to get involved again with having to shoot someone.
I like the stock chain. It carried me to 9s with no problems. It seems to me that there are more problems reported with the aftermarket chains despite the fact that there are so few of them out there comparatively.
Phil


