Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Roller rocker tip weights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #1  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default Roller rocker tip weights

Hey all im looking for any infor I can get on various roller rocker tip weights. Im particularly interested in the scorpions, so if you got some info please post up!
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 04:28 PM
  #2  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default

bump...
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #3  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Its rpm related. Valve spring selection has alot to do with it also.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 10:37 PM
  #4  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default

ya it seems so. Im considering getting the scorpions because alot of the local builders like em. Im not sure if I have enough spring pressure to avoid valve float though, which is why I wanted to know the tip weight.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #5  
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
From: NW Houston, TX
Default

What springs are you running? Have you thought about shimming them?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 12:10 AM
  #6  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default

currently running the PRC dual springs rated at 6.50 lift, I think they are ~4oo pounds open seat pressure.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 05:01 AM
  #7  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Scorpion was redesigning the rocker due to strength issues at the pushrod cup. I personally wouldn't use them until that issue has been proven to be corrected.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default

As far as Ive heard they have already been corrected, anyone?
Also what are these made of? I thought they were aluminum but I see references to steel?

Last edited by ZMONSTER!; Feb 4, 2009 at 05:16 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #9  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

The arm itself is aluminum.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #10  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default

bump...
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
405HP_Z06's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 19
From: Arlington, Tx
Default

This subject has been discussed many times in the past. Tip weight does not tell the accurate story concerning the effectiveness of rocker arm design. When your talking weight, it's all about the location of the weight.

I did some research on this subject a while back with the intent of calculating the mass moment of inertia for stock and other popular rocker arms. I dropped it but should pick it up again.

Just for grins, here are the 'tip weights' that I have:
Rocker type: (overall / tip weights)

Stock: 140.1 / 8.2 g
Crane 1.8: 149.8 / 22.8 g

These weights do not represent the weight actually seen by the valve train.

Mass Moment Of Inertia

"Mass moment of inertia is the relationship between the center of gravity of an object with irregular geometry and the rotational axis. The Mass Moment of Inertia of a solid measures the solid’s ability to resist changes in rotational speed about a specific axis. The larger the Mass Moment of Inertia, the smaller the angular acceleration about that axis for a given torque. The further the center of gravity is from axis of rotation, the higher the mass moment of inertia. The higher the mass moment of inertia, the more spring pressure needed to control the rocker arm instead of the valves. For example, every gram that is removed from the nose of a rocker arm (lower mass moment of inertia) operational RPM goes up significantly."

As you can see, as the Mass Moment of Inertia changes dramatically as the rocker arm is lightened, particularly at the nose. Obviously, there are limits to the amount of lightening possible, but when the weight is reduced, the capability of extending the engine RPM range increases. Keep in mind this finding also shows a tendency to improve valve spring life (as pointed out above, the spring is "less concerned" about the weight of the rocker, and "more focused" upon the weight of the valve).

Reference: Dr David J Grieve
Here's how to calculate the mass moment of inertia of an IC engine rocker arm. http://www.tech.plymouth.ac.uk/sme/desnotes/valvet1.htm
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #12  
Old SStroker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Default

Stock LS rocker arms are lighter, stiffer and have less inertia (lower tip weight) than any commercially available rocker I know of. Therefore they take less spring to control which makes things easier on the valvetrain and/or allows higher rpm will less trouble. 7800+ with stock hydraulic lifters and rocker arms is doable. It has been done successfully. Springs, retainers and pushrods are not stock on that kind of setup.

If you must spend money on rockers, have Harland Sharp install their better bearings in your stock LS rockers.

Jon
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 03:09 PM
  #13  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Originally Posted by Old SStroker
Stock LS rocker arms are lighter, stiffer and have less inertia (lower tip weight) than any commercially available rocker I know of. Therefore they take less spring to control which makes things easier on the valvetrain and/or allows higher rpm will less trouble. 7800+ with stock hydraulic lifters and rocker arms is doable. It has been done successfully. Springs, retainers and pushrods are not stock on that kind of setup.

If you must spend money on rockers, have Harland Sharp install their better bearings in your stock LS rockers.

Jon
Well Said Jon!
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 04:54 PM
  #14  
Old SStroker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Default

Originally Posted by JPH
Well Said Jon!
Thanks, and my name doesn't even start with a "P".

Sometimes I think I'm talking to the wall on stuff like this. Some folks would be amazed at the places roller-tipped rockers are NOT used in some pretty high-end engines, and not because of rules. It's usually because the extra mass of the roller that doesn't do anything useful for MMoI or stiffness. The minor friction advantage of the roller tip is more than negated by the heavier (higher MMoI) roller.

From 455HP's post above, if you remove the non-rotating parts of the rockers which do not enter into the MMoI, the stocker is even better. We use titanium retainers to knock off 10 grams and then we put 12 gm back on with roller tips! Does that sound strange to anyone else?

Jon
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #15  
405HP_Z06's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 19
From: Arlington, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Old SStroker
<snip>From 405HP's post above, if you remove the non-rotating parts of the rockers which do not enter into the MMoI, the stocker is even better. We use titanium retainers to knock off 10 grams and then we put 12 gm back on with roller tips! Does that sound strange to anyone else?

Jon
The stocker weighs 82.2 grams with the trunnion removed. I have a Crane that I'm disassembling so I can weigh it without the trunnion.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #16  
ZMONSTER!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
Default

I appreciate the comments fellas. I just get an urge to replace my stock rockers with rollers every time I pop the hood. I guess Ill just stick to the stockers for now.

Off topic some what, but would a set of roller rockers do anything toward quieting down the valve train? Thats another big reaon I consider the swap.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #17  
z28241's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
Likes: 1
From: western new york
Default

How many guys run stockers and have the bearings fall out of it? I have heard of this happening. Also does anyone know the turn around time by sending them to H.S. for the upgrade?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #18  
Brief Encounter's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Indiana (Highland)
Default

what about a set of stainless steel shaft mounts?
worth the money, or are they still inferior to the stockers?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 04:42 AM
  #19  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by ZMONSTER!
Off topic some what, but would a set of roller rockers do anything toward quieting down the valve train? Thats another big reaon I consider the swap.
I think the jury is still out on that one. I have seen some report that it does and other report no difference. If you are running a FAST it will be even worse.

Interesting aside, I bought one of the new Malibu's and the cover on the motor that makes it look pretty is about 1/4" thick sound deadening material (not plastic). Car is very quiet.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:14 AM
  #20  
lstvr's Avatar
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 458
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham UK
Default

So what about the wear on the guides that some people say will happen with bigger lift cams? BTW i changed back to stock rockers from Comp Cam rollers and cured my valve float, so a fan of stock.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.