El Torro Cam?
03-05-2009, 09:27 AM
#21
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It has more to do with Overlap than the LSA. I have some idle videos on here. I have a low LSA, but don't have as much overlap, so it sounds smoother than most on the same LSA.
03-05-2009, 12:35 PM
#25
03-06-2009, 06:22 PM
#30
11 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
using this in the 68 as well, just can't argue with the results ... combined with great driveability and the idle doesn't keep the g/f from riding along but still has nice chop and sounds good
no #s yet but it feels bigger
no #s yet but it feels bigger
03-06-2009, 07:14 PM
#31
03-07-2009, 07:18 AM
#33
SOM produced less power with heads and FAST than chris did with a similar cam.
Makes me curious... iknow that chris has every bolt on out there plus no AC. But still SOM without the heads and Fast would be producing an estimated 40 - 50 rwhp less than chris. Makes me think even more that chris's numbers are the result of a freak.
Chris what were your numbers before the cam? Mustang dyno?
Makes me curious... iknow that chris has every bolt on out there plus no AC. But still SOM without the heads and Fast would be producing an estimated 40 - 50 rwhp less than chris. Makes me think even more that chris's numbers are the result of a freak.
Chris what were your numbers before the cam? Mustang dyno?
03-07-2009, 08:17 AM
#34
SOM produced less power with heads and FAST than chris did with a similar cam.
Makes me curious... iknow that chris has every bolt on out there plus no AC. But still SOM without the heads and Fast would be producing an estimated 40 - 50 rwhp less than chris. Makes me think even more that chris's numbers are the result of a freak.
Chris what were your numbers before the cam? Mustang dyno?
Makes me curious... iknow that chris has every bolt on out there plus no AC. But still SOM without the heads and Fast would be producing an estimated 40 - 50 rwhp less than chris. Makes me think even more that chris's numbers are the result of a freak.
Chris what were your numbers before the cam? Mustang dyno?
so even if my car was a freek before being SI i still gained 7mph from the cam swap and 85mm setup, and also keep in mind my stock maf was descreened and i had an aftermarket MTI lid on there too, i wasnt going from a stock maf/lid setup...
i would be very comfortable saying that you will get at least 50rwhp from this cam...
03-07-2009, 05:04 PM
#35
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SC
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will have to see if I can find my old dyno sheet, but my car with just the exhaust (No LT's) was around 325.
After Lt's, LS6, Underdrive Pulley, and the cam..my results are shown above.
After Lt's, LS6, Underdrive Pulley, and the cam..my results are shown above.
03-08-2009, 11:34 AM
#36
