I make good power but...
riiiiiiiiiiiigggggggghhhhhhhtttttttttttt.......... .......... 
05-26-2009, 08:49 PM
#42
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: wish I could remember
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
don't forget I just lost about 75more lbs off car and got retune....and will not have a 250lb passenger this time so I gonna turn that 3/4 car into 3-4
05-26-2009, 09:52 PM
#43
Restricted User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a little comparision to look at before buying a bigger cam. This is a LS2 GTO that we did a while back.
The blue graph is a VRX3 with the stock intake
The red graph is a VRX6 with the stock intake
And the green is the VRX6 with a Fast 90 intake.
Look at the power under the curve the smaller cam had compared to the bigger cam. I would have loved to see the small cam with the Fast intake.
The blue graph is a VRX3 with the stock intake
The red graph is a VRX6 with the stock intake
And the green is the VRX6 with a Fast 90 intake.
Look at the power under the curve the smaller cam had compared to the bigger cam. I would have loved to see the small cam with the Fast intake.
05-27-2009, 03:55 AM
#45
Here's a little comparision to look at before buying a bigger cam. This is a LS2 GTO that we did a while back.
The blue graph is a VRX3 with the stock intake
The red graph is a VRX6 with the stock intake
And the green is the VRX6 with a Fast 90 intake.
Look at the power under the curve the smaller cam had compared to the bigger cam. I would have loved to see the small cam with the Fast intake.
The blue graph is a VRX3 with the stock intake
The red graph is a VRX6 with the stock intake
And the green is the VRX6 with a Fast 90 intake.
Look at the power under the curve the smaller cam had compared to the bigger cam. I would have loved to see the small cam with the Fast intake.
I gotta say... I love my power down low. Makes the car fun as hell to drive...
wonder if it would be worth just bumping it to a 228 or low 230's cam...
05-27-2009, 06:03 AM
#46
Restricted User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High 220's to low 230's is all you really need to make good drivable power.
06-13-2009, 04:56 PM
#50
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Paramount CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with your added compression from your 59cc AFRs I would suggest something in the range of 234/242 .6XX .6XX on a 112LSA. You will probably pick up 12-16RWHP over your current setup and still have nice drivability. If you wanted max effort grab the Vindicator from Ron over at Vengence
I'd probably just start off with a ported 92/92mm setup from Vengence for 1199. youll get 350-440 for your stock intake and TB and an intake swap is alot easier and faster than a cam swap.
I have a feeling that a ported 92 setup on your car would net 20RWHP and 10RWTQ due to you already having a decent set of heads.
I couldn't justify paying an additional $200-300 just to have the intake taken out 4mm's extra in an area that wont be a restriction on your motor.
I'd probably just start off with a ported 92/92mm setup from Vengence for 1199. youll get 350-440 for your stock intake and TB and an intake swap is alot easier and faster than a cam swap.
I have a feeling that a ported 92 setup on your car would net 20RWHP and 10RWTQ due to you already having a decent set of heads.
I couldn't justify paying an additional $200-300 just to have the intake taken out 4mm's extra in an area that wont be a restriction on your motor.
