Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what year ls1 is best?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2009, 03:46 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jrwilliam1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default what year ls1 is best?

looking to buy a complete ls1 and was wondering which year was most reliable/strong? had 98 and it didnt last too long
Old 06-10-2009, 03:56 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (19)
 
Ericbigmac83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Owings, Md
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They are pretty much the same as far as that goes. I'd take lower miles over a year difference
Old 06-10-2009, 04:01 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
 
dmiz0420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: N. Va
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

01 to 04 used the ls6 Block, you can look up the advantages of that via a search.

They changed the piston rings on the 02+ so they wouldn't smoke as much. Ironically, the 01 were too hard or stiff and were hard to break in.

heads were different in 01+ when they went to the center bolt valve covers. the 241's were better than prior years. also 01+ had an ls6 intake manifold.

Last edited by dmiz0420; 06-10-2009 at 04:07 PM.
Old 06-10-2009, 04:01 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
First Collision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pretty much all the same.. anything low mileage and 99+ would probably be best
Old 06-10-2009, 04:07 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Shawn MacAnanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

2000+ engines had upgraded rod bolts, also had 241 heads, the best castings but not by much. Also some 2002 engines had Ls6 shortblocks, and they all had LS6 intakes i believe.
Old 06-10-2009, 04:55 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

98 cause its the first year they put the LS1 in the FBODY..
02 cause its the last year of the 4TH gen..
Old 06-10-2009, 06:15 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
black01_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Myers, FL.
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would reccommend a 98 engine not their PCM. they also had good rod bolts

99,00 no

01, piston rings suck but get a ls6 intake

02, good rings, and ls6 intake and good rod bolts.


So either a 98 or 02. If you need the pcm and all the nuts and bolts get the 02 if you just need a motor get a 98 as you can pick them up cheap as they are usually looked at as the baster child- sucky heads and intake. Swap the intake and heads and you will suprise a lot of people as the cam in the 98's isn't all that bad compared to the rest.
Old 06-10-2009, 07:24 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (71)
 
MrElectric03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wow, alot of info I have never heard of on here.

Nothing wrong with 98 blocks, if you are going to rev over 7k id machine out the metal between the lifter oil passages.

01 and newer are best if you are going to use the entire motor, they have the 241 heads and LS6 intake.
Old 06-10-2009, 11:03 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (41)
 
LS1Silverado05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They all are pretty close.... but as stated above 241 heads are best as well as LS6 intake...so 01-02 would be the best on paper... but hell all the years are pretty good overall and they all need some fortification to go big power...
Old 06-10-2009, 11:09 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
Super Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 'Merica
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dmiz0420
01 to 04 used the ls6 Block,
Nope only some of the engines had the ls6 block, no real benefit either!


Originally Posted by Shawn MacAnanny
2000+ engines had upgraded rod bolts, also had 241 heads, the best castings but not by much. Also some 2002 engines had Ls6 shortblocks, and they all had LS6 intakes i believe.
Nope, only the later 2000's had the heads. The 2001 and up engines did for sure though and from what I've researched only the 01's + had the upgraded rod bolts, but some people have stated that later 2000's did while other people have torn apart their 241 headed 2000 engines and they didn't have the upgraded rod bolts.

Last edited by Super Speed; 06-10-2009 at 11:14 PM.
Old 06-10-2009, 11:16 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Quik Sand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmond, Ok
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

99's obviously
Old 06-10-2009, 11:39 PM
  #12  
Launching!
 
02ws602wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kings park New York
Posts: 223
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'd go with maybe the 03'04 blocks used in the vettes and gto's mostly all ls6 blocks that had the oil passage in the crankcase and the ls6 intake and better cam than previous years y not go newer or GMPP for the LS6 engine for 6k Y not hold out and get a great block/engine drop in and go and help out the general.
Old 06-10-2009, 11:47 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Sharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,996
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TXMaro
Pretty much all the same.. anything low mileage and 99+ would probably be best
+1...

All the changes don't amount to a hill of beans IMO.

Oh, and if you're looking to buy a complete engine, I would seriously consider SDPC's GMPP engines. They come with a warrantee and are like $3500 and that's with everything intake to manifolds and oil pan.

EDIT: I'm wrong. They are like $6,000. Don't know why I thought they were that low!

Last edited by Sharpe; 06-10-2009 at 11:54 PM.
Old 06-11-2009, 02:26 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jrwilliam1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so my best bet is to get a 2002....if i have a 98 pcm what do i need to run an 02 engine?
Old 06-11-2009, 02:41 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I would say 01-up. Upgraded rod bolts, better intake, but smaller cam. When I bought mine, I knew the 98-00s had a bigger cam, but prolly gonna change the cam anyway so IMO just for the intake its worth it. Even then, some small slight differences.
Old 06-11-2009, 02:41 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
DVS99TRANS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: E City,NC & Newark,DE
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

In all truth, a 99-02 will do you good. You can say what advantages what years had, but you'll end up forged it in the long run lol

I would say a 2002 block, and you have a chance of an LS6 for that matter. The only real advantage to that is better water jackets which will only help if you are PUSHING that motor hard.
Old 06-11-2009, 03:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
silverLSWON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

the newer..the better. 98 to 99 had smaller oil passages and were more prone to letting go. 2000 is a hit or miss year but some 2000's had the better 241 heads(not much better) they also has a smaller camshaft as the 98-99 engines had the c5 vette cams. 01 had the ls6 intakes, some had ls6 blocks and had stronger rod bolts. 02 is pretty much the same as 01 but they came with MLS head gaskets. the 00^ also had better flowing manifolds
Old 06-11-2009, 03:27 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
silverLSWON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jrwilliam1988
so my best bet is to get a 2002....if i have a 98 pcm what do i need to run an 02 engine?
all the 98 sensors and engine wiring harness. some 98's had a different front end harness(one with the headlights and fuse box) which means some of the pins are different. i swapped a 98 ls1 into a 98 v6 car and had to change to front end harness because it wouldn't let the one side of the motor fire up. but all 99 and ^ v6 and v8 front end harness's are the same. you best bet would be to get a 99^ front end harness and engine harness. they are easy to switch out and it's worth it
Old 06-12-2009, 12:45 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This is like the most fucked up full of misinformation thread I have read on here ever!!!

Just to cover a couple things.

98 computers are a little harder to tune but unless running F/I a decent tuner should have no prob.

A few 01/02 f-bodys had LS6 blocks but in reality there are trade offs for the "bay to bay" bulkhead breathing you hear about for the LS6. Like some builders won't sleeve the LS6 cause they consider them weaker.


01-02 got the better rod bolts not 98 as posted. I have a 98 so I know but mine spin 6500 no probs so far.

There isn't 5HP difference in all LS1 heads. The LS6 243 castings are the desirable OEM heads for these cars.

Yes LS6 intakes came on 01/02 cars.

LSwon...Yes some track cars like at Bondurant that max run on a track had oiling issues but the they fixed the prob by running 15w-50 oil. Their oil temps ran excessively high for long periods. This is not something we should really be concerned with on a streetcar though. I can go into more detail but this post is long enough......

Last edited by SOMbitch; 06-12-2009 at 12:51 AM.
Old 06-12-2009, 02:09 PM
  #20  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jrwilliam1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SOMbitch
This is like the most fucked up full of misinformation thread I have read on here ever!!!

Just to cover a couple things.

98 computers are a little harder to tune but unless running F/I a decent tuner should have no prob.

A few 01/02 f-bodys had LS6 blocks but in reality there are trade offs for the "bay to bay" bulkhead breathing you hear about for the LS6. Like some builders won't sleeve the LS6 cause they consider them weaker.


01-02 got the better rod bolts not 98 as posted. I have a 98 so I know but mine spin 6500 no probs so far.

There isn't 5HP difference in all LS1 heads. The LS6 243 castings are the desirable OEM heads for these cars.

Yes LS6 intakes came on 01/02 cars.

LSwon...Yes some track cars like at Bondurant that max run on a track had oiling issues but the they fixed the prob by running 15w-50 oil. Their oil temps ran excessively high for long periods. This is not something we should really be concerned with on a streetcar though. I can go into more detail but this post is long enough......
k so what excactly do i need to slap on an 02 engione. i got a 98


Quick Reply: what year ls1 is best?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.