Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: What do you consider to be an acceptable valvespring life?
5-10K
3
3.19%
10-15K
15
15.96%
15-20K
25
26.60%
25-30K
25
26.60%
35-40K
7
7.45%
40-50K
8
8.51%
50-75K
4
4.26%
75-100K
4
4.26%
100K+
3
3.19%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

What is an acceptable valvespring life to YOU?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2003, 08:30 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

For me it's more of I don't want to deal with it more than once a year period. I usually drive ~20,000 miles a year so say 25,000 miles min. My 99 T/A only saw 6,000 miles last year so at that rate valve springs every ~2-3 years seems very reasonable to me for a decent heads and cam car.
Old 12-10-2003, 03:34 PM
  #22  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Stroker or all bore motors both present the oppertunity for internal items to wear and/or break sooner than a 346 motor. So even though you might be getting the same power with a smaller cam and longer valvespring life, you are facing new potential issues with stroker and/or bored motors over the stock cube motor. Bascially, there is no easy way out. If you are going to mod for more power, something is gonna give sooner than if it were stock.
I agree . . . Besides the reasons already mentioned, any time you increase the stroke of a motor, piston speeds increase, and that increases cylinder wear and lowers the rpm the engine can turn before it throws a rod. And increasing the bore will make the block weaker and more prone to flex under stress. Having said that, the C5R 427's seem to be doing pretty well.
Old 12-10-2003, 03:52 PM
  #23  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I voted 10-15k for my setups.Figured they get week from the passes I do and it's cheap insurance to change them.
Old 12-10-2003, 05:41 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
 
TTopJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cal
I agree . . . Besides the reasons already mentioned, any time you increase the stroke of a motor, piston speeds increase, and that increases cylinder wear and lowers the rpm the engine can turn before it throws a rod. And increasing the bore will make the block weaker and more prone to flex under stress. Having said that, the C5R 427's seem to be doing pretty well.

Thanks y'all - I knew all that, but considered them problems with easy solutions.

piston/rod angles? Don't go any bigger than 4.00 stroke

Dropped Sleeves? Don't buy an all bore engine for a few years, wait until they've sorted that issue out and let someone else be the guinea pig.

Increased piston speeds? Lower the redline, or keep it at 6000rpm. Or put it at 6500, but don't go there often.

Block more prone to flex under stress? Sounds like a non issue for a N/A application - and if you're on boost you're going to lift a cylinder head before you flex the block.


There may be reliability/longevity issues with stroker's and all bores, but you don't encouter them with a mild setup.
Old 12-10-2003, 09:31 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TTopJohn

Dropped Sleeves? Don't buy an all bore engine for a few years, wait until they've sorted that issue out and let someone else be the guinea pig.
The Darton thread in this section makes it appear that the wet sleeves will work without issue IF you have the right CNC machines and programs to do super precise machine work and a top notch machinist in a controled enviroment. So I think it might be sorted out...guess we'll see over the next year...
Old 12-11-2003, 08:28 AM
  #26  
roy
TECH Resident
 
roy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mehlingen, Germany
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

50,000 to 75,000 min for me, Road race and auto cross and see a lot of miles . It has to a certain degree of reliability for me, not max power.
Old 12-11-2003, 09:04 AM
  #27  
STF Veteran
 
99-LS1-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cal
I agree . . . Besides the reasons already mentioned, any time you increase the stroke of a motor, piston speeds increase, and that increases cylinder wear and lowers the rpm the engine can turn before it throws a rod. And increasing the bore will make the block weaker and more prone to flex under stress. Having said that, the C5R 427's seem to be doing pretty well.
Explain to me how increasing the stroke increases the piston speed. To me it seems like increasing the stroke only increases the distance that the piston travels instead of the speed at which it travels. The extra torque that you get from a stroked motors is from the piston being in its power stroke longer than the engine with the shorter stroke. I agree with the statement about throwing a rod at a lower RPM with stroked motor but, I don't agree with your explanation. If I am wrong then someone explain why I am wrong. Just curious. I am not trying to criticize you in anyway I just want to make sure that I understand what you are saying.
Old 12-11-2003, 10:18 AM
  #28  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99-LS1-SS
Explain to me how increasing the stroke increases the piston speed. To me it seems like increasing the stroke only increases the distance that the piston travels instead of the speed at which it travels.
As you mention, increasing the stroke increases the distance that the piston must travel. The amount of time that the piston has to travel this distance is determined by engine rpm. So at any given engine rpm, the piston must travel farther in the same amout of time that the stock setup had, therefore it must travel faster to do that. This also means the piston must accelerate through it's travel harder since the piston changes direction, putting more stress on the rod and rod bearings due to higher inertial loading. If the engine is both bored and strocked, the pistons also have more inertia than before (due to higher weight,) compounding the situation, so you could expect less life from the rod bearings in a 427 even if it isn't driven hard. But don't get me wrong, I still want a 427 LS engine inspite of this!
Old 12-11-2003, 10:54 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
v8maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Commerce, MI
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i voted 15-20k.

I already broke 2 at less than 5k, and it sucks.

I would really like to see some springs on my DD car last that long.

-Steve
Old 12-11-2003, 10:54 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
boomcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: CT,
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Im gonna say 5 to 10k , that is what I hope for on my next set of valve springs, My last set of 02 ls6 springs did great for 400 miles LOL now I invested in some manley springs and ti Retainers . Im pretty hard on the car and I spray it so Id be happy with 5 to 10k.
Old 12-11-2003, 03:42 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
 
killer01ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Troy Al
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I said 40 to 50K but I would be happy and cross my fingers for 40K.
I will be going with the TR230 cam with dual springs and Tit Rets. I know allot of people say that dual springs are over kill for a 575/563 lift cam..... but I want over kill so maybe I can get 40K
Old 12-11-2003, 03:51 PM
  #32  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I personally don't want to have to replace any sooner than 20K (10K is NOT acceptable to me).....I have 25K on my 987s (TR224/224) and when I rebuild (soon) I will be replacing them.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.