Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

232/238 .595/.605 112+2 dyno sheet....or similar cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2009, 06:59 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DSkyles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 232/238 .595/.605 112+2 dyno sheet....or similar cam

Looking for anyone who may be able to show me a dyno sheet with this cam or one very close. I would like to see where the power curves are at.
Old 11-07-2009, 07:04 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Huggerorange73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norridge, IL
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DSkyles
Looking for anyone who may be able to show me a dyno sheet with this cam or one very close. I would like to see where the power curves are at.
I have the exact same cam in my car...pm me your e mail address and I will send you the sheets from the pulls.
Old 11-07-2009, 09:39 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a 232/238 612 606 111+2 lsa on xfi lobes with a fast 90/90 and TSP stage 2.5 5.3 heads..With a TCI 3500 stall itand 3:23 gears it put down 434rwp 407rwt..Stepped up to a 4400 stall and 3:73 gears and now put down 426 rwhp 407rwt..Yeah I lost dyno numbers by steppin up in gear and stall but the car is soo faster and alot more fun..Hope this helps
Old 11-07-2009, 11:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
thirdgenbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Carroll County, MD
Posts: 1,407
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by john563
I have a 232/238 612 606 111+2 lsa on xfi lobes with a fast 90/90 and TSP stage 2.5 5.3 heads..With a TCI 3500 stall itand 3:23 gears it put down 434rwp 407rwt..Stepped up to a 4400 stall and 3:73 gears and now put down 426 rwhp 407rwt..Yeah I lost dyno numbers by steppin up in gear and stall but the car is soo faster and alot more fun..Hope this helps
stock shortblock? did you have to flycut? what about degreeing in the cam...or did you just stick it in straight up?
Old 11-07-2009, 11:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
squee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry for the highjack, but I have a similar cam I'm thinking of putting the the stock motor I'm bout to put in my car. Its a 232/236 .595/.595 110+4. Its pretty similar in specs, but the LSA is what I'm concerned with. Should I be? As far as performance goes that is...
Old 11-08-2009, 03:43 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

might be close

Comp 232/236 .579/.579 114 LSA with stock 243 heads

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...rs-inside.html
Old 11-08-2009, 01:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thirdgenbum
stock shortblock? did you have to flycut? what about degreeing in the cam...or did you just stick it in straight up?
Stock shortie,and no fly cut
Old 11-08-2009, 07:09 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
thirdgenbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Carroll County, MD
Posts: 1,407
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

kickass...i'm going to be going with the TSP 233/239 cam(which has simliar specs to yours), 6.0L with a set of diamonds that already have some valve reliefs, but i really don't want to do extra cutting, cause the requires extra assembly time. i'd really like to be able to put the shortblock together once, then only have to put the cylinder heads on a couple of times while i figure out things like pushrod length and ptv clearances and stuff...
Old 11-09-2009, 12:23 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Huggerorange73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norridge, IL
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A little audio might help?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyFE30pyTyU
Old 11-09-2009, 06:39 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
thirdgenbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Carroll County, MD
Posts: 1,407
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

very nice should sound good in my car: 6.0L 11:1, single 4" with a dynomax bullet.
Old 11-09-2009, 07:53 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Red99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Here's a crappy graph. Mine's a 232/237 .614"/.621" on a 113+2 w/ LSL lobes. The graph is with an LS6 intake and ported TB plus only 24 deg timing and I was picking up some knock too. Since then I've added a ported 90, ported 90 LS2 TB, and timing is at 26 deg now that we got rid of the knock (it was either bad gas or oil getting sucked in through the PCV causing detonation before I added my catch can)
Old 11-09-2009, 08:24 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Very nice Red99TA. That knock also could have been the 13.5:1 A/F ratio; a little lean. Regardless, those numbers ROCK!
Old 11-09-2009, 08:42 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Red99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
Very nice Red99TA. That knock also could have been the 13.5:1 A/F ratio; a little lean. Regardless, those numbers ROCK!
Yeah I don't know that I trust the dyno's O2 sensor or not. Mine was tuned on the street with a wideband about 8" behind the passenger side collector at about 12.9:1 up top. I really think it was ingesting too much oil from the PCV system since we could only get it to play right with 24 deg timing. With the new catch can we may even be able to go above 26 deg but my tuner didn't want to risk it without getting it on the dyno. Notice that graph was STD so not that impressive IMO. I think with the changes it could do 460+ SAE of course I need a new clutch first though!

Last edited by Red99TA; 11-09-2009 at 08:47 PM.
Old 11-10-2009, 11:24 AM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Red99TA
Notice that graph was STD so not that impressive IMO. I think with the changes it could do 460+ SAE of course I need a new clutch first though!

I hear yah....same curve to 460+ would make me gizz.

Still, the HP curve shown (& under curve numbers) looks really good to me. It looks the way a controllable power curve should look, one that will produce less wheel spin through the RPM's, all the while increasing. IMO, it's better than a quick stab in HP (& high torque for that matter) & then flatter HP through 6700 RPM.

Anyway, even 445 RWHP is 525 bhp created by a naturally aspirated 346 cu. in. small block engine. We are unbelievably fortuneate.
Old 11-10-2009, 01:42 PM
  #15  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
HO99Vertz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

another sound clip for ya fro ma cam thats close...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ym5S2ha9CVw



Quick Reply: 232/238 .595/.605 112+2 dyno sheet....or similar cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.