Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Too much compression with my heads and LQ9???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2009, 08:49 AM
  #41  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I pulled the cam cards on two old cams I have that have a couple of chewed lobes..... If they aren't bent, i can stick both in and will check.

#1
Grind #3715R /3717R Hr 113.0
224/228 .567/.571
XE lobes
109 intake cl
Lobe sep 113

#2
Grind # 3355/3355 HR111
236/235 .550/.550
Extreme marine lobes
111 intake cl
111 lobe sep

My guess is that I will end up with something inbetween these that will fit???

Cam #2 was picked because it was when the motor was used for road racing and provided a very flat tq curve. over 400 rqtq from 3200-6000, peaking at 434. The XE lobes started at .6xx lift for 236 duration......

Cam #1 worked well with a 5.7 cartek st II X heads 430 rqhp and 389 rwtq (from what I remember from 6 years ago....)
Old 11-30-2009, 09:45 AM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would use the #2 cam to imprint the clay because of the .550/.550 lift .

With the 408 your going to want to get as much duration and lift as you can get .
Old 11-30-2009, 09:48 AM
  #43  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by =ZoomZ=
I would use the #2 cam to imprint the clay because of the .550/.550 lift .

With the 408 your going to want to get as much duration and lift as you can get .
Not a 408. Stock LQ9 with heads/cam.
Old 11-30-2009, 10:30 AM
  #44  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by =ZoomZ=
I would use the #2 cam to imprint the clay because of the .550/.550 lift .

With the 408 your going to want to get as much duration and lift as you can get .
you are still confusing lift with PTV problems. they are completely NOT EVER related. Everyone is trying to point this out. You are sending him on a wild goose chase. Reminds me of all the SBC guys that call in asking about a cam that is "streetable" but not one of them "high lift racing cams".
Old 11-30-2009, 10:45 AM
  #45  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
you are still confusing lift with PTV problems. they are completely NOT EVER related. Everyone is trying to point this out. You are sending him on a wild goose chase. Reminds me of all the SBC guys that call in asking about a cam that is "streetable" but not one of them "high lift racing cams".

The PTV will be a function of duration and agressiveness of the lobe right? If I hit on the 236/236 cam I would then know that that is too much duration regardless of the lift based off the marine lobe profile? I hope the 224/228 cam clears since I really don't want to go smaller than that......
If I determine the clearance (or lack there of...) with the two cams, will that data be enough for me to spec the largest cam that will fit?

how much does lobe seperation and centerline effect PTV?
Old 11-30-2009, 10:50 AM
  #46  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was only saying to use the .550/.550 for testing because the duration was higher than the other cam and it had less of a split .

I was not trying to imply that lift was the only factor .
Old 11-30-2009, 10:52 AM
  #47  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It affects it enough that if you have probs with a cam not working at 0* then it may clear just fine installed 2-4* advanced....still get the good power of them cam, allbeit a different powerband. I would not do that though for your car. Im just pointing that out.
Old 11-30-2009, 10:54 AM
  #48  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

then if you were saying that, and to keep from being stuck on the same train of thought, maybe you should identify the cams you are talking about not by lift.
Old 11-30-2009, 10:55 AM
  #49  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
=ZoomZ='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Winter Springs
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

True ~
Old 11-30-2009, 01:05 PM
  #50  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Isolde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smithfield, UT
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by John@Scoggin
there is one piece left out from alot of the CR calculators if you want a very true reading. that one does not use deck height, rod length, compression height, or height from top of piston to first ring land. all of those things will factor in as well.

this one is a little more inclusive, plus gives good info on piston speed and how elevation and boost will effect CR. http://www.zealautowerks.com/
You must've edited that to add the link, but I'm glad, it's a neat thing. I think they're wrong about the amount of effect of elevation, but it's better than nothing. Heck, it's better than any other I've seen. So I thank you.
Old 11-30-2009, 01:18 PM
  #51  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

now that my azz is hurting from the boning I'm taking with the LQ9 and my cylinder heads......
Looks like my comp will be too high to work well on pump gas. Can't run big enough cam to lower SCR (mine keeps comming out in the high 9's low 10's)

It looks like I have a couple options:
1. Run Lq9 with stock 317s as is with biggest cam that will fit.
2. replace pistons in LQ9 for lower compression and valve clearance to use current heads.
3. Sell Lq9 and build another motor (might as well if I have to buy new pistons and possibly rods.... I already have a Callies stroker crank anyway)
4. Buy new heads for Lq9 motor (still can't run that big a cam due to PTV)

Since money is tight, I am leaning towards Opt #1. I can always put a milder cam in it down the road and put it in my Silverado when I can afford a REAL engine.

The other options seem to not be cost effective. I bought a low mile LQ9 because I didn't want to tear it appart. I have a 5.7 block and stroker crank already.... just don't want to drop the extra $$$ to build another motor.

So much for being able to use my ported heads and stuff...... this sucks!

Now I get to search what the biggest cam is that will fit in a stock Lq9.....
Old 11-30-2009, 07:44 PM
  #52  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
chevboy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by MBC Racing
now that my azz is hurting from the boning I'm taking with the LQ9 and my cylinder heads......
Looks like my comp will be too high to work well on pump gas. Can't run big enough cam to lower SCR (mine keeps comming out in the high 9's low 10's)

It looks like I have a couple options:
1. Run Lq9 with stock 317s as is with biggest cam that will fit.
2. replace pistons in LQ9 for lower compression and valve clearance to use current heads.
3. Sell Lq9 and build another motor (might as well if I have to buy new pistons and possibly rods.... I already have a Callies stroker crank anyway)
4. Buy new heads for Lq9 motor (still can't run that big a cam due to PTV)

Since money is tight, I am leaning towards Opt #1. I can always put a milder cam in it down the road and put it in my Silverado when I can afford a REAL engine.

The other options seem to not be cost effective. I bought a low mile LQ9 because I didn't want to tear it appart. I have a 5.7 block and stroker crank already.... just don't want to drop the extra $$$ to build another motor.

So much for being able to use my ported heads and stuff...... this sucks!

Now I get to search what the biggest cam is that will fit in a stock Lq9.....
i'm doing same motor with tsp 2.5 5.3 heads that are milled down to 58cc's and i flycut and still am running a pat g 239/247 623/623 112+4 cam which is plenty big
Old 11-30-2009, 09:28 PM
  #53  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Dammmmm, you are going to have some serious static compression!! What thickness gaskets you running?
Old 11-30-2009, 10:01 PM
  #54  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
chevboy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MBC Racing
Dammmmm, you are going to have some serious static compression!! What thickness gaskets you running?
stock mls gaskets and runnin e85
Old 11-30-2009, 10:12 PM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MBC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chevboy28
stock mls gaskets and runnin e85
Aaaaaaaaaahhhh E85. Was wondering where the extra octain was comming from. I though about adding a meth injection kit to mine, but don't know if it would be worth the agrivation.
Old 11-30-2009, 10:18 PM
  #56  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Ice78Transam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naperville, Ill
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

11.3:1 and below have been safe on Pump gas for me before. The tune just has to be dialed in really well, plus its 93 octane in Chicago. 91 is a deal breaker.



Quick Reply: Too much compression with my heads and LQ9???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.