Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

317 heads on LS1: Not feeling great about the idea...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2010, 02:22 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
mattster03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Red face 317 heads on LS1: Not feeling great about the idea...

I'm considering swapping my stock 241 heads on my 2002 LS1 with some low compression 317 heads for a forced induction setup. I'm aware that since the 317 heads are designed for a 4.000" bore motor, I should use gaskets designed for that bore instead of for my 3.900" bore LS1.

This makes me feel a little uneasy b/c I really want to do this right. Is there any actual performance loss or potential issues with doing this? Doesn't this make a larger "lip" at the top of the cylinder bore and the inside ring of the gasket? Would the head gasket be more prone to blowing? Thanks in advance for any input you might have!
Old 10-21-2010, 03:05 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Your LS1 is worth more then an LQ4. Just buy a longblock and sell yours. Done deal.
Old 10-21-2010, 06:17 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Use the gasket for the head, a 6.0 gasket. otherwise a smaller bore gasket will have the fire ring inside the chamber and will burn up.

It will work, I used 317 heads on a 5.3 and worked wonders.... lots of people do.
Old 10-21-2010, 09:16 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
mattster03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Your LS1 is worth more then an LQ4. Just buy a longblock and sell yours. Done deal.
I would like to stay with the aluminum block for weight reasons (I'm driving a swapped LS1/T56 RX7)

Originally Posted by pwrtrip75
Use the gasket for the head, a 6.0 gasket. otherwise a smaller bore gasket will have the fire ring inside the chamber and will burn up.

It will work, I used 317 heads on a 5.3 and worked wonders.... lots of people do.
Just b/c lots of people do it, doesn't mean it's right! My question for everyone is whether or not there are any mechanical or performance problems with running a larger bore head and gasket.
Old 10-21-2010, 09:24 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
sparkwirez06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: brunswick, ohio
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I always thought they wouldn't work, until I saw gm put the 243s( same as 317 except cc) on the 5.3. 310 hp!!
Old 10-21-2010, 09:50 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
pwrtrip75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mattster03
I would like to stay with the aluminum block for weight reasons (I'm driving a swapped LS1/T56 RX7)



Just b/c lots of people do it, doesn't mean it's right! My question for everyone is whether or not there are any mechanical or performance problems with running a larger bore head and gasket.
IDK... my stock junk yard 5.3 w/ 317 heads put down 640whp boosted and ran strong for 3 years before I spun a bearing. Never had a head problem.
It worked.....obviously if you are not putting different pistons in it the 317's are a cheaper way to go... If you want to be "right" then spend "right".

You wont have a single issue putting 317s on an ls1.
Old 10-21-2010, 05:46 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
mattster03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks! I guess since I don't feel like building a motor w/ low comp pistons I guess this is the best route to get my CR down despite the differing bore size...
Old 01-05-2011, 01:19 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Without creating a whole new thread, I'm going to bump this one. What compression ratio are we looking at if we put 317 heads on a 3.900 bore ls1 with no changes to the bottom end? I'm looking at getting these heads to drop compression and keep my stock bottom end.
Old 01-05-2011, 01:34 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Stock heads are 67cc. 317s should be about 72cc. Stock compression is 10.5:1. Prolly wont drop it a lot but it will be some.
Old 01-05-2011, 04:15 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
MikeLSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by sparkwirez06
I always thought they wouldn't work, until I saw gm put the 243s( same as 317 except cc) on the 5.3. 310 hp!!
So GM sold a car from the factory that had a smaller bore cylinder with a head made for a larger bore? And they just dealt with it by doing what we're discussing with the gasket? I'm just interested... what vehicle did they do that in???
...ls4?

if you wanted to put the smaller 5.3 heads on an ls1 block would you use an ls1 3.900 bore gasket?

Last edited by MikeLSS1; 01-05-2011 at 04:30 PM. Reason: read some stuff
Old 01-05-2011, 05:11 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Guys, it is simple. Always go for the bigger bore when gasket size is concerned.
Head chamber bigger, go for gasket to match that, if piston cylinder bore bigger, match gasket to that.
Take a look on Utube and watch what actualy happens in a chamber upon a spark igniting the intake charge of a cylinder. an explosion
Old 01-05-2011, 05:20 PM
  #12  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

^makes sense this way you don't have gasket exposed. What about the compression. I hear they drop a bit on a stock ls1. If you put the 317's with 72cc on then it should bring it down to around 9.1-9.2, right? This is for my turbo build so I figure this would be an easy cheap way to drop compression without doing much to my bottom end except for some arp rod bolts.

Head CC volume vs Compression Ratio:
______________________________________________

The below CR numbers are with the stock GM 5.7L displacement LS1 graphite head gaskets installed.

Installing the thicker 2003 GM MLS head gaskets will decrease your compression ratio by approx 0.1 - 0.2

72.27cc = 9.1 CR
71.71cc = 9.2 CR
71.05cc = 9.3 CR
70.59cc = 9.4 CR
70.03cc = 9.5 CR
69.74cc = 9.6 CR
68.91cc = 9.7 CR
68.35cc = 9.8 CR
67.79cc = 9.9 CR
67.23cc = 10.0 CR
66.67cc = 10.1 CR (stock LS1 head spec)
66.11cc = 10.2 CR
65.55cc = 10.3 CR
64.99cc = 10.4 CR
64.43cc = 10.5 CR (stock LS6 head spec)
63.87cc = 10.6 CR
63.31cc = 10.7 CR
62.75cc = 10.8 CR
62.19cc = 10.9 CR
61.63cc = 11.0 CR
61.07cc = 11.1 CR
60.51cc = 11.2 CR
59.95cc = 11.3 CR
59.39cc = 11.4 CR
58.83cc = 11.5 CR
58.27cc = 11.6 CR
Old 01-05-2011, 05:33 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

What you should watch for is ringlands. Those are the weak link on boosted application in a stock bottom. Stay around 7psi with premium fuel or no more than 10psi with Meth.
Give it plenty of fuel and you'll be good for awhile.
Old 07-05-2016, 07:50 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
 
zukboi2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What about intercooled?
I am thinking 317's on a 5.3 with forged LS1 pistons and rods
Meaning a forged iron 5.7

I have a lm4 5.3 with 799 heads and 9:25.1 compression now

I want to know if my compression will stay the same



Quick Reply: 317 heads on LS1: Not feeling great about the idea...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.