Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

pushrod length with cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #1  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 6
From: Morristown, Tn
Default pushrod length with cam

I know, I know, it's a tired subject. I'm putting a texas speed torquerv2 into a running LS6. I think the cam is 232/234 and just under .600 lift. The engine has 34k since a rebuild was done, I bought it with zero miles after the build and ran it until now. I was told that the heads were milled 30 thousandths. Lifters are stock to my knowledge.

My dumb *** didn't think to compare base circles of the stock cam and the new cam before I installed it.

Ive installed the new cam and Ive read up on the PR checking procedure and done a lot of the testing/checking with my comp pushrod checker. I'm having texas speed send my pushrods that came with the cam package as soon as I settle on a size.

I initially did some measuring and determined that a 7.425 would probably work, so thats what I mentioned to texas speed, and they replied:

Originally Posted by Jon@Texas-Speed
That still seems a little long. I would think something like a 7.375" max. Try checking it with the rocker torqued down and backing the checker out until you are at zero lash and see what it measures.
So I gave this another try.

I put a pushrod in the exhaust side of the cylinder I'm checking, installed the rocker, and turned the crank until the exhaust valve opened. Then I moved the pushrod and rocker to the same cyl's intake valve. I used a different cyl. for this test than the one I was using in the first test, just in case there was something wierd with the lifter on that cyl.

I set my checker pushrod to 7.4 length. I turned the rocker bolt by hand until I could no longer move the rocker up/down (tink/tink/tink) off of the valve stem. Then I torqued the rocker bolt from that point. I got 1.4 turns.

I repeated the procedure with the checker set to 7.425, and got 1.8 turns.

I repeated the procedure with the checker set to 7.375, and got 0.8 turns.

Just for good measure. I shortened the checker and put it into the intake side so it was loose, and torqued the rocker down. Then I lengthened the checker by hand while in the engine, until again I could no longer move the rocker up and down on the valve stem. I took it out and counted the turns and it worked out to 7.325 at zero lash with no preload. So that would seem to indicate that .075 preload would give me 7.4", or 0.100 preload would give me 7.425.

What do you think? 7.4 or 7.425?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #2  
djfury05's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 4
From: Beaufort, SC
Default

7.4 is the norm.. .075 is a good amount of preload also.. probably right on.. 7.4 are usually the least expensive too because of the commonality (is that even a word lol)
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 01:00 AM
  #3  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Even though i have done this several times I still find myself checking several times till I get repeatable results. I like to see the exact same outcome several times in a row before I commit to a pushrod order. This is the method I have always used:

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
FWIW, EVERY cam install I have done using the LS7 lifter with a cam with greater than .600" lift (read smaller base circle) AND stock heads w/GM MLS gaskets has taken 7.425" pushrods for ~.050"-.060" preload. We measure lifter preload on each and every cam install we do. I have never had a lifter failure nor do we end up with the dreaded "sewing machine" noise.

Its very simple, If you change ANY of the following:
valve sizes, valve job, head milling, thinner/thicker head gaskets, decked block, cam with an altered base circle, etc... YOU MUST CHECK FOR PROPER PUSHROD LENGTH.

I have helped countless numbers of individuals with this process over the phone, via email, and PM's. I've posted the process on at least 3 occasions.

Here it is again in a nutshell:

1. Using the EO/IC method, get the lifter to the base circle of the cam.
2. Using a known length pushrod (7.400" is a good start with stock rockers) run the rocker arm bolt down to zero lash. This is easily done with your fingers "wiggling" the rocker, the point at which the "slack" is just gone is zero lash.
3. Set your torque wrench to 22 lb./ft. Tighten the rocker to full torque and count the number of turns it takes to get there. 1 full turn wtih a stock 8mm X 1.25 bolt is ~.047" preload as measured at the pushrod/rocker interface.
4. I normally shoot for 1 1/4 to 1 3/4 turns with stock type lifters like Comp 850's, LS1, LS7 etc.

For an example, if you use a 7.400" pushrod and come up with 3/4 of a turn, you will need at least .025" longer pushrod to get into range. If you end up with 2 1/4 turns, you will need one .025" shorter...

I might not know everything but I will tell you that this method has worked for me year after year cam swap after cam swap. We average 3 cam swaps a week here so you can do the math.

If you are not familiar with the EO/IC method for determining valve events in a 4 stroke engine, its very simple:
For a given cylinder as the Exhaust valve is Opening, the intake lifter will be on the base circle of the cam and lash/preload should be checked for that intake valve.
For a given cylinder as the Intake valve is Closing, the exhaust lifter will be on the base circle of the cam and lash/preload should be checked for that exhaust valve.

THIS METHOD ALWAYS WORKS!!!

I hope this helps someone. I have explained it so many times I think I do it in my sleep!!!

Shane
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 01:36 AM
  #4  
silverZ98's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: eastern north carolina
Default

this is how i did mine and every book i have read from lsx builders and ppl iv talked ot that build these motor all said i did it right. i all so trippled checked it. i went with .050 on preload as everyone told me it better to be a little light than too tight on the pre load.

set the timing marks at 12 o'clock to get the lifters on the base cr for number 1 cylinder then i took my comp cams push rod checker and turned it out 10 turns for a 7.3 length installed it and snugged down the rocker arm and watched it push in the push rod checker so i knew that wasn't zero lash. so i took everything back out turned in the checker half a turn witch should be 7.275. reinstalled it and the rocker and it got me zero lash. no up and down movement in rocker and the checker did have no preload on lifter here. so i then added .050 for the preload and came up with 7.325
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 02:42 AM
  #5  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 6
From: Morristown, Tn
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
Even though i have done this several times I still find myself checking several times till I get repeatable results. I like to see the exact same outcome several times in a row before I commit to a pushrod order. This is the method I have always used:
That's the method I used in the first two tests.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 01:56 AM
  #6  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 6
From: Morristown, Tn
Default

On a related note, texas speed has failed to respond to my PM's sent about confirming PR length and getting my pushrods that were part of my cam kit sent out to me, for about a week now.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #7  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 6
From: Morristown, Tn
Default

still no response from TS...
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 03:01 PM
  #8  
silverZ98's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: eastern north carolina
Default

have you tried calling them? it all ways been much easer for me that way
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

 Brett Foote
story-1

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-8

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-9

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #9  
Mez's Avatar
Mez
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Default

Did you shim the rockers to give them the narrow wipe pattern over the center of the valve first?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 10:54 PM
  #10  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 6
From: Morristown, Tn
Default

Originally Posted by Mez
Did you shim the rockers to give them the narrow wipe pattern over the center of the valve first?
This is the first I've heard of this while using stock rockers? None of the PR length checking writeups I've read have mentioned the need for this with stock rockers. Please, elaborate.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 10:56 PM
  #11  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 6
From: Morristown, Tn
Default

Originally Posted by silverZ98
have you tried calling them? it all ways been much easer for me that way
No. Seeing as how they are a sponsor of this forum, this very section, posted the sale on this forum, the transaction was conducted on this forum via pm...why should I have to call them? Is that not what the PM system is for? The guy was showing online when I sent both pm's over the last week+.

Last edited by RotaryResurrection; Dec 18, 2010 at 11:15 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 04:49 AM
  #12  
SS4Luck's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Mez
Did you shim the rockers to give them the narrow wipe pattern over the center of the valve first?
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
This is the first I've heard of this while using stock rockers? None of the PR length checking writeups I've read have mentioned the need for this with stock rockers. Please, elaborate.

sounds like Mez is talking about roller rockers not stockers
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 06:45 AM
  #13  
silverZ98's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: eastern north carolina
Default

yea there isnt much u can do about the wipe pattern with stock rockers. And there is no reason to get snappy with me i was just saying. some time the phone works better.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.

story-0
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

Don't get dad new socks or a grill brush this year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 14:55:56


VIEW MORE
story-1
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-2
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-3
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-4
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-6
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-9
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE