need help picking intake between FAST
there isnt really any good deals on fast 92/92's in the classifieds right now.
im thinking of just spending the money now get the 102 with rails, put the 92mm TB and later on when i upgrade my heads to some prc227/237's ill upgrade the TB to 102 and send the intake to tony and that should really wake the car up!
in the end with the 102/102 ported and prc 227/237's i would like to run some 10.50's , doable?
now i need to figure out what kind of catback i want
im thinking of just spending the money now get the 102 with rails, put the 92mm TB and later on when i upgrade my heads to some prc227/237's ill upgrade the TB to 102 and send the intake to tony and that should really wake the car up!
in the end with the 102/102 ported and prc 227/237's i would like to run some 10.50's , doable?
now i need to figure out what kind of catback i want
I picked up a FAST 102 from a member on here last week. After talking to Mike Norris I am going to stick with a 92mm T/B. He said the testing/tuning he has done, there's not much benefit with the larger T/B and the 90/92 T/B's are easier to tune and have better throttle response. I have a PTM 92mm but I am looking for a NW.
I picked up a FAST 102 from a member on here last week. After talking to Mike Norris I am going to stick with a 92mm T/B. He said the testing/tuning he has done, there's not much benefit with the larger T/B and the 90/92 T/B's are easier to tune and have better throttle response. I have a PTM 92mm but I am looking for a NW.
Just like tony said the head is only as good as the intake port and suppley of the intake.
I picked up a FAST 102 from a member on here last week. After talking to Mike Norris I am going to stick with a 92mm T/B. He said the testing/tuning he has done, there's not much benefit with the larger T/B and the 90/92 T/B's are easier to tune and have better throttle response. I have a PTM 92mm but I am looking for a NW.
I have posted this earlier in the thread, take off your lid and look down the snout and you will see why it only flows 84mm
I have heard on the local boards of a couple people saying that the larger volume will kill the low end. I was originally going to get a 92, but after reading this, my research has come to a grinding halt again.. 
damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.
damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel. I have heard on the local boards of a couple people saying that the larger volume will kill the low end. I was originally going to get a 92, but after reading this, my research has come to a grinding halt again.. damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.
damn...... Will a 92/102 combo help retain some low end? I will be adding cats to this to further help the low end. It's also a Pat G TQ cam with worked over (non-milled) 243 heads from Wheel2Wheel.