Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

40 mpg Trans am LS1/LS6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2011, 04:31 AM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

THEM ALL
Old 07-20-2011, 09:49 AM
  #22  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Camaroz18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why would I be banned? Im actually trying to gain an actual knowledge base and perspective on this
Old 07-20-2011, 10:30 AM
  #23  
Staging Lane
 
Faught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Round Rock TX
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 07-20-2011, 11:39 AM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
THEM ALL
Originally Posted by Camaroz18
Why would I be banned? Im actually trying to gain an actual knowledge base and perspective on this

It's a back-handed joke; meaning that an LSX engine is a powerfull beast, why clutter the site w/ setting one up for fuel mileage. Don't sweat it. He's a good guy & is very helpful here. Am not trying to speak for him. This is just my view of his post.

Remember the fuel mileage part of the tune is a different "map"/"area" within the program than the area that controls wide open throttle (peak power/torque) fueling. So, it is possible to have both within reason.
Old 07-20-2011, 09:41 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
02silvaZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i live in Jax, FL and i have LT's and ORY and got 30mpg on my drive to Ft Lauderdale
Old 07-21-2011, 12:09 PM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (18)
 
theskitztikwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: montgomery alabama
Posts: 520
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Frost has duel prom ecm's so you can run two different tunes if you don't have software.
Old 07-21-2011, 12:16 PM
  #27  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (14)
 
macknmikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

im lucky to get 17mph highway
Old 07-21-2011, 12:37 PM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Yah, forgot to note that transmission & rear end gearing can help or hinder, as well.
Old 07-21-2011, 01:16 PM
  #29  
Staging Lane
 
Faught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Round Rock TX
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

love my stock 2.32 in my a4, i avg 20mpg
Old 07-21-2011, 01:19 PM
  #30  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (14)
 
macknmikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Faught
love my stock 2.32 in my a4, i avg 20mpg
i used to get 27mph highway with my 3.23s but after headers/intake and a 3800 stall not so much
Old 07-21-2011, 03:22 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
01 ss vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll give my input.

Is it possible? I think so, but it would take a skilled hypermiler driver and some tuning that I'm not sure is possible with our OEM set-up, even with aftermarket software.

The truth is, you probably only need about 40-50 hp to keep a 3700lb car going a CONSTANT velocity. A car with down low torque (think very low RPMS, like 1200) and geared for effiency would be needed, along with a lean tune (as someone mentioned) and perhaps fuel shutoff on unneeded cylinders - such as GM's Displacement on Demand. I don't believe tuning software can do this on our cars, because the turning off the fuel injector to those cylinders also ties in with the lifters somehow.

As for improving fuel economy, you will be most efficient with the slowest speed possible in overdrive (or 6th gear in M6 cars) and the vehicle under very little load (which is the case with constant velocity on level roads). Typically you are looking at high 40s, to low 50s mph for this, and lets be honest, it's not exactly safe or time efficient to be driving at those speeds for long distances such as on interstates.

I bet if I hypermiled my car, I could pull near 30mpg, but 40 would be REALLY hard to imagine without running lean, less weight, and really low speeds....too low for me to enjoy anyway. I'll take what I'm getting at 75mph with the top down!

I think an M6 car would be better due to various gearing options and more opportunites to coast with the clutch disengaged.
Old 07-21-2011, 03:36 PM
  #32  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
BURN'EM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mooresville NC
Posts: 832
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My corvette on stock tune with Prodyno CIA, and Borla touring exhaust would get 34.7 on interstate trips with 93.
Leaned out cruise rpms and at the same 75mph. It brought down 37.6 that is getting on interstate, setting cruise from NC to FL and never touching gas or getting off highway.
Old 07-21-2011, 06:46 PM
  #33  
Staging Lane
 
Faught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Round Rock TX
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by macknmikey
i used to get 27mph highway with my 3.23s but after headers/intake and a 3800 stall not so much
ya highway ill get 26-27 but i have a lot of city driving which kills my mpg



Quick Reply: 40 mpg Trans am LS1/LS6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.