Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

i need a cam :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2011, 10:15 PM
  #21  
Restricted User
iTrader: (12)
 
z99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: kansas
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
Show me proof of track time slips or street vids I got the proof to back up I wanted a thunder racing cam for the longest time until I found out about fms
Wtf r u talking about? I agreed that a 224r with a 4k stall would kill a f14 with a 2800 stall and than recomended a great setup. What proof of track time slips are you wanting?
Old 08-14-2011, 10:16 PM
  #22  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
torquer v3....
done....
Old 08-15-2011, 12:57 AM
  #23  
Teching In
 
2000 Knapp WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Springfield, Illinois
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z99ls1
Wtf r u talking about? I agreed that a 224r with a 4k stall would kill a f14 with a 2800 stall and than recomended a great setup. What proof of track time slips are you wanting?
that cam without gears would lug around like no other. the F14 w/ 114 lsa high lift cam has a strong powerband of 2600-7000 the trq curve under the peak is amazing basically a straight line. and the horse is the same if not just a lil higher and imo the cammotion lobes are better and run smoother my friends has a f12 ill post some dyno runs when i get it in itll haul man
Old 08-15-2011, 01:07 AM
  #24  
Restricted User
iTrader: (12)
 
z99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: kansas
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a 224r without gears would lug lmao. Not with a 4k stall. There would be no lugging and thats for sure.
Old 08-15-2011, 01:12 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
An F14 car with a 2800 stall would get drug by a TR224 car with a 4k. Just sayin....
I have a 226 cam with a 4000, ill be the test subject!
Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
Do ur research man look at the power curve on the 2 then check ur power band I'll b done with my 60 foot as u hit 3500 rpms just sayin if u typed wrong n meant a 242 cam then with high gears maybe so
I would absolutely embarrass your car in the 60ft if you have a 2800 converter with any cam. The f13 and f14 has impressed me in very few setups.
Fwiw I'm full weight and cut 1.50-1.52 short times barely spinning with a nitrous tune 2200+da. Find any 2800 converter ls1 car with any gears and any cam and ill paypal you 100$. An f14 with a 2800 converter is going to be a dog, period. That is a large cam, it needs a 3600+.
Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
Show me proof of track time slips or street vids I got the proof to back up I wanted a thunder racing cam for the longest time until I found out about fms
It is all over this board. Ask fms yourself if a 228r with a 4000 or an f14 with a 2800 would be quicker, promise they say 228r. Has nothing to do with the cam, its the converter.
Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
that cam without gears would lug around like no other. the F14 w/ 114 lsa high lift cam has a strong powerband of 2600-7000 the trq curve under the peak is amazing basically a straight line. and the horse is the same if not just a lil higher and imo the cammotion lobes are better and run smoother my friends has a f12 ill post some dyno runs when i get it in itll haul man
What cam? A 224? Lug? Please, you would be fine with 273s.
The f series cam are definitely strong mid range runners, 30-80mph, when set up correctly. They seem to not pull so hard up top however, not compared to other similar size cams.

Knapp, I understand your logic... And on paper it stands to be correct. however, it doesn't pan out like that in the real world.
Old 08-15-2011, 08:31 AM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

It's extremely hard arguing with a bench racer because when it makes sense on paper, it has to work that way in reality and thats simply not the case. I have own/ran-raced/driven a bunch of LS drivetrains. Dyno numbers mean exactly **** on a racetrack or the street. Like I said, a tr224/4k car would drag an f14/2800 all day everyday. Believe what you want, I have actually OWNED some of the combos you speak of
Old 08-15-2011, 02:04 PM
  #27  
Teching In
 
2000 Knapp WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Springfield, Illinois
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wut bout the f14 with a 3200 on the 114lsa w/ a power band of 3000-7000?? ill take u word for the 2800 stall.
Old 08-15-2011, 02:19 PM
  #28  
Teching In
 
2000 Knapp WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Springfield, Illinois
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry guys im not gunna arque with the more experienced i am just looking at papers and dynos but hey lemmons what gears would you use on the f14 w/ a 3200 stall in a a4?
sorry,
knapp
Old 08-15-2011, 03:53 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
sorry guys im not gunna arque with the more experienced i am just looking at papers and dynos but hey lemmons what gears would you use on the f14 w/ a 3200 stall in a a4?
sorry,
knapp
Your probally gonna run 3.73s.
Old 08-15-2011, 11:14 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
wut bout the f14 with a 3200 on the 114lsa w/ a power band of 3000-7000?? ill take u word for the 2800 stall.
Same deal honestly.. Would be a bit better but you are still looking at lazy 1.7+ short times and horrible shift extensions, aka dropping out of power band afer every shift.
Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
sorry guys im not gunna arque with the more experienced i am just looking at papers and dynos but hey lemmons what gears would you use on the f14 w/ a 3200 stall in a a4?
sorry,
knapp
373s are great all around gears for an auto. I personally would leave 323s in if that's what you have until you go to a built rear. If 273s, I would upgrade to a used 342 rear. The difference in gears for an auto are minimal to non existent, the teade offs aren't worth it.

Now... Personally, I wouldn't use a 3200 in this given setup. Kind of handicapping the setup. With that size cam I recommend a 4000 converter. It will help with wife the cam has a 114 and power comes in a bit late and will keep the extensions high enough after the shift you won't "lag" until you get back into the power band.
3200 is a very small converter and almost a waste imo if you have a choice, you WILL wish you have went bigger. I promise. I suggest a minimum 3600 but strongly urge 4000. Couple that with the f14 and you will be happy with the results. If you want to go smaller on the coverter, I suggest a smaller cam.
Old 08-15-2011, 11:27 PM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Take the powerband recommendations with a grain of salt. They kind of give end of spectrum numbers.
Old 08-15-2011, 11:40 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

^this.

I don't even look at what they say in those little side paragraphs. Learn a small bit about cams and know about what the true powerband will be.
Old 08-16-2011, 01:55 AM
  #33  
Teching In
 
2000 Knapp WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Springfield, Illinois
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
^this.

I don't even look at what they say in those little side paragraphs. Learn a small bit about cams and know about what the true powerband will be.
i just dont want to be lugging around on the street this is more of a street racer/dd than strip car for me and if i go 4000 stall the stock gears would still be fine? btw thanks fo being cool about my recent posts
Old 08-16-2011, 08:01 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2000 Knapp WS6
i just dont want to be lugging around on the street this is more of a street racer/dd than strip car for me and if i go 4000 stall the stock gears would still be fine? btw thanks fo being cool about my recent posts
It would be worse having a large cam, like the f14, with a small 3000 converter than it would with a larger converter. That's just going about it backwards.

I had a 4400 converter with 323s and an ms4, I drove this every single day for two years.. if it wasn't for the dumped exhaust being so loud i would say anybody could handle it.

The difference between a 4000 and a 32000 aren't that big of a difference while normal driving. Under wot there is a huge difference and well worth it.

If you are worried about the loose feeling, which is what I think you mean by lug, install some 373s and it will rememdy that.

I personally have not seen a lot of impressive f13/14 setups. However with the right converter and head combo it will run hard. No matter if you go with a 224 cam or a trex, the smallest I recommend is a 3600. Anything larger than a 230 size cam I would say 4000 or bigger.

No problem, everyone has to start somewhere. Just keep an open mind and want to learn and you will be happy with decisions.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.