Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why no gains after head install?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2011, 03:28 PM
  #61  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Grasping at straws now, but running a one step colder plug (ngk tr6) than stock wouldnt cause me to be down on power would it?
Old 09-13-2011, 04:25 PM
  #62  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
I am not questioning whether that is true, I am asking why it is true. The only answer offered up so far consists sole of the words "torque converter." So why does a torque converter render rear gear selection irrelevant?
If you took 2 stock stalled a4 cars(same mods) and put 3.73's in one 2.73's in the other, the 3.73 car is going to pull the 2.73 car. The reason being the 3.73 car is getting up into its power faster... the stock stall is so tight being 1700rpm, the motor has to pull through the entire rpm range 1700-6k rpm. The 3.73 car can get through that midrange dead spot and up into it's power range faster than the 2.73 car.

However a stall converter changes this by allowing the engine to get past that dead spot instantly, since the stall converter's job is to flash to the desired stall speed,, regardless of the gear ratio. lets say you have a 3600 stall and from a dig when you floor the car, the converter will "flash" to 3600rpm and instantly applies all the motors torque. The converter is basically slipping under 3600 rpm and the only real benifit to having the 3.73 gears is to "tighten" up that "loose" feel below stall speed.

Hope this helps... or did I make it more confusing lol?

Last edited by kinglt-1; 09-13-2011 at 04:48 PM.
Old 09-13-2011, 04:43 PM
  #63  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
If you took 2 stock stalled a4 cars(same mods) and put 3.73's in one 2.73's in the other, the 3.73 car is going to pull the 2.73 car.
It will pull very, very little.....what you are saying makes sense on paper but just doesn't actually apply in real life.
Old 09-13-2011, 04:59 PM
  #64  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
hardcore4sure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Ca.
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok how bout this. On my 99ss I had ARE stg2 heads (probably equal or slightly better than stock 243s), LS6intake, TR224 cam, Yank 3600SS stall 3.73 gears and ran 11.8@116-118 all day on a tune that shifted 1st-2nd and 2nd-3rd at 6000 rpms. Then I switched to 205cc AFRs and a FAST 78 but killed my 3.73s and had put 3.23s back in would run 11.9 and mph dropped to 114-115 only and never more, shifting closer to 6500. The 3.73 dropped me into the Powerband better on shifts and I was pulling above 6000rpms crossing the line. So even with more power the car ran a little slower with 3.23s.

Last edited by hardcore4sure; 09-13-2011 at 05:10 PM.
Old 09-13-2011, 05:19 PM
  #65  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by hardcore4sure
Ok how bout this. On my 99ss I had ARE stg2 heads (probably equal or slightly better than stock 243s), LS6intake, TR224 cam, Yank 3600SS stall 3.73 gears and ran 11.8@116-118 all day on a tune that shifted 1st-2nd and 2nd-3rd at 6000 rpms. Then I switched to 205cc AFRs and a FAST 78 but killed my 3.73s and had put 3.23s back in would run 11.9 and mph dropped to 114-115 only and never more, shifting closer to 6500. The 3.73 dropped me into the Powerband better on shifts and I was pulling above 6000rpms crossing the line. So even with more power the car ran a little slower with 3.23s.
Hmm, that is interesting. Have to ask why did you put 3.23s back in? You wouldn't happen to have any dyno numbers for each setup would you?
Old 09-13-2011, 06:11 PM
  #66  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ok, started to tear into it a little bit and when taking out the plugs there was oil on the threads for cylinder 7, 5, 3 all the rest were dry. Is this something to be concerned with?
Old 09-13-2011, 06:28 PM
  #67  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,417
Received 885 Likes on 631 Posts

Default

Is it just on the threads or on the end too? My car has some bad valve seals and the plugs that were fouled out had oil on the threads.
Old 09-13-2011, 06:38 PM
  #68  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

yeah it was just on the threads. All the plugs look pretty much the same out on the end.
Old 09-13-2011, 06:40 PM
  #69  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I thought about bad valve seals. I am planning a leak down check will bad valve seals show up on the test?
Old 09-13-2011, 07:25 PM
  #70  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
hardcore4sure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Ca.
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old dyno # was 390rwhp with heavier Yank 3200 and ARE StgII (270cfm) heads, 3.23s 17X11 Grand Sport wheels and 315-35-17 Nitto DRs and a questionable mail order tune from TTS. I never dynoed with the AFR/FAST set up cuz I had the heads milled for 11.0 compression then sold the car. The new owner had it re-tuned (old tune sucked) and said it got 432 unlocked 450 locked. It had a Yank 3600SS was roughly 20lbs lighter and OEM Z06 wheels with 305-35-18 DRs. I usually ran on DRs but did ET streets once and ran 2 tenth & 2mph slower then the rear started whining. I worked at a dealership and got it replaced under warranty but had to use 3.23s. The new owner got it back to solid 11.8s @116 with new power but also ran ET Streets which were much taller. In the end had he went back to the 3.73s on the good tune shifting properly I honestly think it would have gone 11.4 or better.
Old 09-13-2011, 07:30 PM
  #71  
On The Tree
 
macca33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 60 mi SE of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It was mentioned earlier, but I don't know if you responded - how does your tune VE table compare now to when it was pre-heads? Your VE table should've increased all over, as the efficiency of the engine has been dramatically altered - the engine is receiving a lot more air now.

I reckon your tune is well worth dissecting, otherwise, you may have some mechanical factor which is contributing to it all.

Good luck.
Old 09-13-2011, 07:30 PM
  #72  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
hardcore4sure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Ca.
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For reference my friend had a similar setup, but ETP heads and a 228-232 cam dynoed 458rwhp thru 3.42 and a locked Yank 4000 ran 11.1@121
Old 09-13-2011, 07:47 PM
  #73  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

well go to do the leak down test and the damn harbor freight tester doesn't work. so looks like it will have to wait till tomorrow. going to measure PRs now and see if my math is still good.
Old 09-13-2011, 08:21 PM
  #74  
12 Second Club
 
Mighty Whitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Catlettsburg, Ky
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The fact that your ls1 car with a cam and converter was only trapping 114 is enough of a red flag to me.
Shortblock showing it's age?
Old 09-13-2011, 08:35 PM
  #75  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ok check my math. just did cyl1 intake PR. exhaust valve was starting its way down so I am on the base circle of the intake lobe. I measured 8.5 turns to 0 lash.
8.5 x .05=.425 + 6.8=7.225 + .080 preload=7.305.
So by that measurement if I am running a 7.325 PR then my preload would be at .100, correct? So could my valves be staying open? I checked this 3 times.

checking the exhaust valve now.

Just did the exhaust and came up with the exact same measurements. So to me it looks like my PRs are too long..??

Last edited by LeftySS; 09-13-2011 at 09:01 PM.
Old 09-13-2011, 08:41 PM
  #76  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
LeftySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Little Rock, Ar
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Mighty Whitey
The fact that your ls1 car with a cam and converter was only trapping 114 is enough of a red flag to me.
Shortblock showing it's age?
Well that is what I am trying to figure out. Car does have 125K miles but I am the only owner and until the past year the car was never raced and always had the oil changed. Not saying it still isn't warn but that is why I am going to do a leak down and compression test to see though.
Old 09-13-2011, 09:15 PM
  #77  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
It will pull very, very little.....what you are saying makes sense on paper but just doesn't actually apply in real life.
So your saying that even with the stock converter, the 3.73's are no gain over the 2.73's?
Old 09-13-2011, 10:43 PM
  #78  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Exactly, very little. I didn't believe it myself except: I had a bolt on car vs. car (stock converters) only difference being 2.73 to 3.23 and neither one of us pulled. Not one inch. I have seen my car with 3.23s and 3.73s at the track with little to no effect on ET or traps. Nothing else matters when you see back to back proof. Gears in autos do give a seat of the pants feeling though....
Old 09-13-2011, 10:46 PM
  #79  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Use this: you find 0 lash then count the turns to get to 22 ft/pounds. From Shane at Thunder Racing

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
FWIW, EVERY cam install I have done using the LS7 lifter with a cam with greater than .600" lift (read smaller base circle) AND stock heads w/GM MLS gaskets has taken 7.425" pushrods for ~.050"-.060" preload. We measure lifter preload on each and every cam install we do. I have never had a lifter failure nor do we end up with the dreaded "sewing machine" noise.

Its very simple, If you change ANY of the following:
valve sizes, valve job, head milling, thinner/thicker head gaskets, decked block, cam with an altered base circle, etc... YOU MUST CHECK FOR PROPER PUSHROD LENGTH.

I have helped countless numbers of individuals with this process over the phone, via email, and PM's. I've posted the process on at least 3 occasions.

Here it is again in a nutshell:

1. Using the EO/IC method, get the lifter to the base circle of the cam.
2. Using a known length pushrod (7.400" is a good start with stock rockers) run the rocker arm bolt down to zero lash. This is easily done with your fingers "wiggling" the rocker, the point at which the "slack" is just gone is zero lash.
3. Set your torque wrench to 22 lb./ft. Tighten the rocker to full torque and count the number of turns it takes to get there. 1 full turn wtih a stock 8mm X 1.25 bolt is ~.047" preload as measured at the pushrod/rocker interface.
4. I normally shoot for 1 1/4 to 1 3/4 turns with stock type lifters like Comp 850's, LS1, LS7 etc.

For an example, if you use a 7.400" pushrod and come up with 3/4 of a turn, you will need at least .025" longer pushrod to get into range. If you end up with 2 1/4 turns, you will need one .025" shorter...

I might not know everything but I will tell you that this method has worked for me year after year cam swap after cam swap. We average 3 cam swaps a week here so you can do the math.

If you are not familiar with the EO/IC method for determining valve events in a 4 stroke engine, its very simple:
For a given cylinder as the Exhaust valve is Opening, the intake lifter will be on the base circle of the cam and lash/preload should be checked for that intake valve.
For a given cylinder as the Intake valve is Closing, the exhaust lifter will be on the base circle of the cam and lash/preload should be checked for that exhaust valve.

THIS METHOD ALWAYS WORKS!!!

I hope this helps someone. I have explained it so many times I think I do it in my sleep!!!

Shane
Old 09-13-2011, 10:48 PM
  #80  
12 Second Club
 
Mighty Whitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Catlettsburg, Ky
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
So your saying that even with the stock converter, the 3.73's are no gain over the 2.73's?

Lol, makes sense as to why there's a handful of stock 2.73 cars that barely break in to the 13's, yet almost all 3.23 cars (I've seen) run 13.5-13.6 area?
Gear isn't everything in the slushbox world. But it's definately a noticeable gain.

Watched a friend's LT1 car go from 12.50's to 12.0's when he switched from a 3.23 to a 3.73. Yet it had small converter in it too?


Quick Reply: Why no gains after head install?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.