GM Lawsuit on "Pistonslap"
Yes, there are SOME, and a very small percentage of motors with legit issues out there.
But for the most part, piston slap is an effect of the overall design of the engine, is and should be considered normal, and not detrimental to the motors longevity, performance, or efficiency.
To say he has .000001% of an understanding of what he's talking about, it would be generous. The only thing he sees, like most scum of the earth lawyers, is MONEY.
Piston noise in the LS1's is a combination of SEVERAL issues, none of which cause any appreciable problems.
1: Aluminum block that transmits noise.
2: Short skirt, LOW FRICTION, LIGHT WEIGHT, EFFICIENT pistons.
3: Hyperutectic casting process makes pistons hard, WEAR RESISTANT, durable, lighter as they can be made with less material, and have LITTLE THERMAL EXPANSION. The last quality is perhaps the most significant.
Lets get into geometry now. Lets say you have a 4 inch diameter piston, that is 3 inches tall. Now lets say you have a .004" cylinder wall clearance. Because of the length, the tangent of wich that piston can rotate vertically, upon the wrist pin, is very low.
For the next example, we'll leave the same 4 inch diamater piston with a .004" clearance, and shorten the skirt to 2 inches. Now rotate that piston on it's wrist pin center and you will find an appreciably higher amount of "rock" in the assembly, as the length from the center of the radius to the edge of the skirt is shorter.
For a simpler visualization, although more radical, try this. Take a roll of quaters, and drop one in. Does it go down perfectly flat? No. Now glue 3 or 4 quaters together, and try it again. Does it go down flat? Yes, but does it still have some play in it? Yes. Ok, now glue 8 quaters together, and see what happens. Goes down smooth, and with little if any perceivable play.
That is a simplified example of how a short skirt piston will behave in a large bore. The obvious soloution is to tighten piston to wall clearances. This is where it gets complicated. Remember when I said hypereutctic pistons have little thermal expansion? Ok, that is a quality of the design that allows some flexability with tight bore clearance. It also means the piston won't expand much, or fast, to take up any extra clearance. But one material still remains, and the tolerances of that material cannot be changed. OIL! You have to leave slight clearance for oil to remain on the cylinder walls to reduce friction, WEAR, heat, efficiency, etc.
So what we now have is a short skirt, low thermal expansion piston, in a cylinder, with small expansion and oil clearances, moving up and down on a connecting rod attached with a pivot point.
Next up: manufacturing tolerances. The tolerance for a "perfect" bore diameter that exactly balances the requirements of thermal expansion and oil coating is extremely tight, on the order of less than +.002 -.000. To produce such a tolerance in efficient, AFFORDABLE high speed production is nearly impossible.
So let's add up the facts here.
We have high horsepower engines, that get nearly 30mpg, produce very low emissions, rev all day long to 6,000+rpm, run well over 100,000 miles, are inexpensive to manufacture and purchase, and they make a little noise.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? ALL THAT AND PEOPLE ARE READY TO BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS OVER A LITTLE NOISE????
I have 56,000 VERY HARD miles on my car, and it has had some piston noise since I purchased it with 17,200 miles on it over two years ago. Since then, I have put over 100 passes on the car, likely over 50 bottles of spray on the street and track, abuse the car to unbelievable extents on a daily basis, run the motor dead *** cold in the morning on the way to work fairly regularly, and it still runs as good if not better than it did almost 40,000 miles ago, has shown normal metal on the drainplug magnet, and shows up perfectly clean bores on a borescope.
The thing that people seem to be missing is that while not all GenIII motors have piston noise, many do and VERY few of them have ever developed a problem. Likely they were extreme cases that should have been resolved. The rest are just bandwagon golddiggers, or have been mislead by this ignorant, and greedy lawyer.
So go ahead, show GM how much you all appreciate them building an affordable 350hp car that ran low 13's/high 12's stock, could be had for around $20,000, gets great gas milege, handled nice, and was extremely reliable.
It's ******* lawyers like this that just kill any prospects of manufacturers even bringing such products to market ever again. So in a few years, when there is still no Camaro, Firebird, or other affordable RWD V8 sport coupe on dealer floors, that lawyer and all of his clients can pat themselves on the back then go sit in a corner and cry that GM won't make any cool cars anymore, and wonder why.
Last edited by Pete2k_Z28; Mar 10, 2004 at 11:06 PM.
i'm going to pay more attention and see how bad it is when the car is warm.
has anyone taken this up with the dealer with mods on the car? i'm sure the blame would be pointed straight there...but who knows
Yes, there are SOME, and a very small percentage of motors with legit issues out there.
For the next example, we'll leave the same 4 inch diamater piston with a .004" clearance, and shorten the skirt to 2 inches. Now rotate that piston on it's wrist pin center and you will find an appreciably higher amount of "rock" in the assembly, as the length from the center of the radius to the edge of the skirt is shorter.
For a simpler visualization, although more radical, try this. Take a roll of quaters, and drop one in. Does it go down perfectly flat? No. Now glue 3 or 4 quaters together, and try it again. Does it go down flat? Yes, but does it still have some play in it? Yes. Ok, now glue 8 quaters together, and see what happens. Goes down smooth, and with little if any perceivable play.
That is a simplified example of how a short skirt piston will behave in a large bore. The obvious soloution is to tighten piston to wall clearances. This is where it gets complicated. Remember when I said hypereutctic pistons have little thermal expansion? Ok, that is a quality of the design that allows some flexability with tight bore clearance. It also means the piston won't expand much, or fast, to take up any extra clearance. But one material still remains, and the tolerances of that material cannot be changed. OIL! You have to leave slight clearance for oil to remain on the cylinder walls to reduce friction, WEAR, heat, efficiency, etc.
So what we now have is a short skirt, low thermal expansion piston, in a cylinder, with small expansion and oil clearances, moving up and down on a connecting rod attached with a pivot point.
Next up: manufacturing tolerances. The tolerance for a "perfect" bore diameter that exactly balances the requirements of thermal expansion and oil coating is extremely tight, on the order of less than +.002 -.000. To produce such a tolerance in efficient, AFFORDABLE high speed production is nearly impossible.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? ALL THAT AND PEOPLE ARE READY TO BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS OVER A LITTLE NOISE????
I have 56,000 VERY HARD miles on my car, and it has had some piston noise since I purchased it with 17,200 miles on it over two years ago. Since then, I have put over 100 passes on the car, likely over 50 bottles of spray on the street and track, abuse the car to unbelievable extents on a daily basis, run the motor dead *** cold in the morning on the way to work fairly regularly, and it still runs as good if not better than it did almost 40,000 miles ago, has shown normal metal on the drainplug magnet, and shows up perfectly clean bores on a borescope.
The thing that people seem to be missing is that while not all GenIII motors have piston noise, many do and VERY few of them have ever developed a problem. Likely they were extreme cases that should have been resolved. The rest are just bandwagon golddiggers, or have been mislead by this ignorant, and greedy lawyer.
So go ahead, show GM how much you all appreciate them building an affordable 350hp car that ran low 13's/high 12's stock, could be had for around $20,000, gets great gas milege, handled nice, and was extremely reliable.
It's ******* lawyers like this that just kill any prospects of manufacturers even bringing such products to market ever again. So in a few years, when there is still no Camaro, Firebird, or other affordable RWD V8 sport coupe on dealer floors, that lawyer and all of his clients can pat themselves on the back then go sit in a corner and cry that GM won't make any cool cars anymore, and wonder why.
Seriously though, my 2002 4.8 does it all the time and I could care less. Ain't gonna hurt anything as far as I can see. I still get 22mpg out of it and I consider that damn impressive for a truck. No oil burning either.
I bet that wipes out 99.9% of the people who complain of piston slap.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
And the other 99.9% of you can quit yer b*tchin.
I'd really care more, but the car has almost 90K in it, and I am building something else. No sense getting involved in legal stuff...
i agree 100% with above statement, man its noisy when cold out big time!!!
once engine oil hit 180 ok termal expansion you know!!!!!!!!!
but when it warms up u dont hear it at all
never burns oil either
maybe people sould stop using thin *** mobil 1 5w-30
use amsoil 10w-30 turbo formula its the best oil out there








