Was the stock Fbody 98-00 cam "bigger/better" than 01-02??
02-04-2012, 10:43 PM
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was the stock Fbody 98-00 cam "bigger/better" than 01-02?? I'm getting a lot of conflicting info. I have seen the 98-00 specs at:
202/210 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.496" / 0.496" int/exh lift
116 LSA
But I have also seen this for 98-00:
198/209 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.500" / 0.500" int/exh lift
119.5 LSA
Whereas for the 01/02 I have fairly consistently seen:
197/207 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.467" / 0.479" int/exh lift
116 LSA
Which of the first two 98-00 specs is correct and is it a "bigger/better" cam than the 01-02?
202/210 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.496" / 0.496" int/exh lift
116 LSA
But I have also seen this for 98-00:
198/209 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.500" / 0.500" int/exh lift
119.5 LSA
Whereas for the 01/02 I have fairly consistently seen:
197/207 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.467" / 0.479" int/exh lift
116 LSA
Which of the first two 98-00 specs is correct and is it a "bigger/better" cam than the 01-02?
02-04-2012, 11:02 PM
#3
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just need something to "hold us over" on a L33 5.3L swap into an RX7. Really don't feel like keeping the truck cam in there. Do you know which of the two 98-00 specs I posted above is correct? I've seen i both ways...
