Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

? for you guys that have been there done that with heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 07:52 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default ? for you guys that have been there done that with heads

The latest plan was to get some PRC 5.3L stage 2.5 heads with a 228 cam. I was going to go this route because its a great DD capable setup and my tuner recomemded it on a budget.
Im wondering from you guys if I will be kicking myself down the road for not spending more on a set of heads?
I understand the prc cnc'd 5.3s are great and raise compression but am I rushing into this? Should I be going for some TFS 215s or something?
I also understand this might turn into a 5.3 vs 6.0 debate
Old 02-14-2012, 07:58 PM
  #2  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Prc 2.5 5.3 heads make decent power for cost vs. horsepower.. But if you have a ls1 id look into the tfs as cast ls1 220 and send them to brian tooley and let him work some magic and touch them up. An aftermarket casting head will take you further than a gm casting head.. BUT a AI/T.E.A. ported ls6 head would be hard to beat... If your on a budget tho just get the 2.5 5.3 heads... But they wont hold a candle to a ported ls6 head or a aftermarket casting head
Old 02-14-2012, 08:08 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1nasty86
Prc 2.5 5.3 heads make decent power for cost vs. horsepower.. But if you have a ls1 id look into the tfs as cast ls1 220 and send them to brian tooley and let him work some magic and touch them up. An aftermarket casting head will take you further than a gm casting head.. BUT a AI/T.E.A. ported ls6 head would be hard to beat... If your on a budget tho just get the 2.5 5.3 heads... But they wont hold a candle to a ported ls6 head or a aftermarket casting head
How much more power would a cnc'd 243 make over PRC 5.3s?
The ls6 your talking about are 243s correct?
Old 02-14-2012, 08:11 PM
  #4  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yes.. And id guess 10-20 hp
Old 02-14-2012, 08:14 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1nasty86
Yes.. And id guess 10-20 hp
Iv actually read on here that the 5.3s would make more compression and the 243s would probably make only 10 more at most. But idk
Old 02-14-2012, 08:31 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
Camaroking1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Id say either get 220cc trick flows or get 243's and have them fully ported by AI
Old 02-14-2012, 08:40 PM
  #7  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yeah man... This is just me but id have a T.E.A. ported head over a prc ported head any day..
Old 02-14-2012, 08:43 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
Camaroking1996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the difference between a 317 and 243 head?
Old 02-14-2012, 09:57 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Killer5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ms
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by senicalj4579
The latest plan was to get some PRC 5.3L stage 2.5 heads with a 228 cam. I was going to go this route because its a great DD capable setup and my tuner recomemded it on a budget.
Im wondering from you guys if I will be kicking myself down the road for not spending more on a set of heads?
I understand the prc cnc'd 5.3s are great and raise compression but am I rushing into this? Should I be going for some TFS 215s or something?
I also understand this might turn into a 5.3 vs 6.0 debate
If you have any idea you may want an aftermarket head just wait and keep saving your $$ for them. The tfs is an excellent head , but, you need aftermarket rockers with them I think which is extra $$. If you want a similar flowing head the AFR would be a good choice and would only need a spring upgrade possibly depending on what cam you go with. I f you go with a stock ported casting you can get the LS6 CNC ported from TEA or TSP milled to get as much compression as you can get with 5.3 , but , have better flow.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:18 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
wildcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western PA
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Unless you are trying to make over 450 rwhp I would say got with the prc 2.5 5.3 heads...the way I look at is the xtrA $ you spend on trickflows heads and new rockers you could of bought prc 5.3 heads, cam, and an ls6 intake...but if $ isn't a problem get the trickflows or afrs for the most power potential...

Also 317 heads have a bigger combustion chamber which will lower compression ratio...people usually only run the 317s on nitrous or turbo/supercharged cars...good luck man
Old 02-14-2012, 10:29 PM
  #11  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Afr's use bronze valve guides just like trickflows... I have tfs 225's with powder metal valve guides which allow you to use stock rockers
Old 02-14-2012, 10:41 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
sepsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tampa-ish
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why would someone spend the money for a set of good heads like AFR of TFS and keep the stock rockers and not go with a good roller tip?

That's just half assing it imo.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:43 PM
  #13  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sepsis
Why would someone spend the money for a set of good heads like AFR of TFS and keep the stock rockers and not go with a good roller tip?

That's just half assing it imo.
then this guy right here is half assing
Old 02-14-2012, 10:50 PM
  #14  
formerly twolow02fransen (2014-1-2)
iTrader: (27)
 
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: mASSHOLE
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i was goin to buy PRC 2.5 LS6 heads but changed my mind and went with a set of AI 226cc 243 heads and custom grind reason because of the power numbers the AI setups have been putting down. plus i hear there heads arnt what there cracked up to be you get what you pay for IMO.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:54 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
sepsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tampa-ish
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1nasty86
then this guy right here is half assing

I wasn't trying to put your **** down, I just can't see spending over $2,000+ on heads and slapping the stock rockers on there. Might as well spend an extra $400-500 and get a good set. It's just something I couldn't do just to save a few bucks. Not to mention is good for some extra HP.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:56 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

TFS and AFR stuff is NICE. But when you are on a budget, you can never go wrong with A.I. ported stock stuff.
Old 02-14-2012, 11:01 PM
  #17  
Turd Gen Guy
iTrader: (63)
 
1nasty86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: andalusia, alabama
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sepsis
I wasn't trying to put your **** down, I just can't see spending over $2,000+ on heads and slapping the stock rockers on there. Might as well spend an extra $400-500 and get a good set. It's just something I couldn't do just to save a few bucks. Not to mention is good for some extra HP.
ill see thursday how well the stock rockers perform on the 225's... but brian tooley said i shouldnt have any problems.. and what he says, usually goes
Old 02-14-2012, 11:24 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

All roller rockers are heavier than stock rockers, but not as strong as the stock ones either. Stock rockers with a trunion upgrade are more than adequate. Setting everything up correctly and achieving the correct geometry are key to making the stockers work well with a big cam.

Lots of info in this forum if you search...
Old 02-15-2012, 04:11 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Budget n TFS doesnt sound good to me. Best budget heads are TSP 5.3, something top notch on a budget with stock casting are TEA or AI
Old 02-15-2012, 04:16 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
But when you are on a budget, you can never go wrong with A.I. ported stock stuff.
I agree. I would get a quote from them as well to compare. Their heads have been making some good power.


Quick Reply: ? for you guys that have been there done that with heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.