AI 218 CNC Vs. AI 226 CNC
#3
Bump. I'm also wondering the same question. I'm leaning toward the 226 because I have chamber damage that will need repair anyway, but I don't want to lose an ounce of low end torque. These will eventually be used on a twin turbo, daily driver, small cam (212ish duration intake) build that I want to spool very quickly. Anyone with experience using both heads? Where in the powerband does the 226 surpass the 218?
Last edited by ajseburg; 04-02-2012 at 12:06 PM. Reason: specified "small" cam
#4
Did you guys see the thread in the dyno section where the guy went with the 241 HC CNC head porting that AI offers. Pretty impressive numbers, especially if you already have some 241 heads. Beats having to buy the 243's, then pay to get them ported. You should check it out.
#6
#7
Thread Starter
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (32)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 2
From: Southside Chicago
Bump. I'm also wondering the same question. I'm leaning toward the 226 because I have chamber damage that will need repair anyway, but I don't want to lose an ounce of low end torque. These will eventually be used on a twin turbo, daily driver, small cam (212ish duration intake) build that I want to spool very quickly. Anyone with experience using both heads? Where in the powerband does the 226 surpass the 218?
Trending Topics
#8
Why don't you just ask AI yourself. They are a sponsor on here.
#12
^^ but we should all know by now, flow numbers don't tell the whole tale....
Op has hit it in the head with his question regarding low end torque, as per HIS set-up in question.
Op has hit it in the head with his question regarding low end torque, as per HIS set-up in question.
#13
I sent them my 853's castings, had the 219 high compression CNC porting done and one of their cams. It runs really good, I can lug the car again, easy to drive. Its on my old tune, I will post my numbers up, dyno is this friday.
#14
Here is a graph showing what my 226 ported heads did with an AI cam. Now it reads low because there is still tons of timing in the car due to a weak fuel pump only building 40PSI at the rail at 3k RPM. So on a ultra conservative "base tune" it made 350+ torque at 3200 RPM. Not to bad I don't think.
#17
Go with Ed. If I had a set of 243 heads laying around, that's what I'd do. I bet his port work combined with one of his custom cams would make some serious power EVERWHERE in the powerband.
#18
Good question, I have the same goals in mind. I would think the 241 high compression would be great for low end torque though.
#20
Your low end torque can addressed with the correct custom cam (vlave events) even by going with the larger 226 runner size.