Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

building a cheap short stroke motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2012, 03:03 PM
  #21  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Grendel
I did find a set of Ferrari V12 Carrillo rods that would work in my parts bin, but that would be a bit much... considering that they were probably 8K. My father used to restore classic and exotic cars.
They will not have correct journal or pin size, or length.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 05-04-2012, 03:09 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,687
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

The new copo 327 has a similar crank, 3.15 vs your 3.185. Something tells me those rods aren't exactly floating around the market, though...
Old 05-04-2012, 03:10 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Ive often thought about a motor ive wanted to put together
LQ block 6.0 +.060
LR4 crank/rods (4.8)
+.060 over replacement speed pro lq4 pistons
Clevite bearings
precision machining/balancing/assembly/clearances.
This makes 338ci. I believe it will handle 8000rpm shifts.
I would use 243 heads and ls6 intake.
Of course Jesel rockers. LPE GT11 cam. 10:1 scr
I think this motor would do well in a road race/circuit/autox car.
I would use it in 3rd gen camaro with a t56.
I think it would be very responsive, wind up quick and recover fast out of corners
Old 05-04-2012, 04:07 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Yes and no...shelf stock won't work....BBC comes closest with the 6.535" length, but has the wrong sizing on both ends.

Likely going to be a custom rod (there goes the budget aspect of this build). Might be less expensive and faster build time to get a shelf stock rod and custom piston!
How much?
Old 05-04-2012, 04:51 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Was the the 1st crank of the 2nd one he was selling? I thought about getting one and building a motor for MNCA mean street, 331 cube screamer. go small journal, cam, heads were gona rock, didnt like the TB, intake I could run. And would be able to get alot of street miles lol.
Are you doing this for a class?
Old 05-04-2012, 06:24 PM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Interesting concept but..... Pulling off 8000+ rpm is going to take very high quality and light weight valve train components to have any reliability. Likely want to consider solid roller and this requires adjustable rockers etc. Nothing here remotely close to stock in costs. Your 330 could end up an expensive build.

Look for a very light weight car for this kind of engine.
Old 05-04-2012, 09:01 PM
  #27  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by studderin
Was the the 1st crank of the 2nd one he was selling? I thought about getting one and building a motor for MNCA mean street, 331 cube screamer. go small journal, cam, heads were gona rock, didnt like the TB, intake I could run. And would be able to get alot of street miles lol.
Are you doing this for a class?
Yes, it's the first crank he had for sale.

No class, no one could ever say I had any class
Old 05-04-2012, 09:02 PM
  #28  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by COPO9560
Interesting concept but..... Pulling off 8000+ rpm is going to take very high quality and light weight valve train components to have any reliability. Likely want to consider solid roller and this requires adjustable rockers etc. Nothing here remotely close to stock in costs. Your 330 could end up an expensive build.

Look for a very light weight car for this kind of engine.
Yep, I already have the very light weight stuff. TI valves, Jesel or SLP rockers, and PAC springs. Expensive is all perspective.
Old 05-05-2012, 07:39 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Found a rod set that's 6.520"

really thin head gasket?

Last edited by Grendel; 05-05-2012 at 08:18 PM.
Old 05-06-2012, 06:05 AM
  #30  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
03_Denali's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

years ago hot rod mag done a build using ford 300 ci I6 connecting rods. I believe they were 6.4", you may want to check them out.....
Old 05-09-2012, 08:37 AM
  #31  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 03_Denali
years ago hot rod mag done a build using ford 300 ci I6 connecting rods. I believe they were 6.4", you may want to check them out.....
Those would still be too short.

I have to go custom. Having a set made for 754.00 and change. They will also balance the rotating assembly and install a reluctor wheel for the same fundage. Sent the crank and pistons out Monday. 6 weeks, I should have it all back.

This project is still uber cheap. Grabbing a 6.0L block from Summit for 800.00 shipped. LS3/L92 heads, the SLP roller rockers I already own, "hot cam" and call this project acquired. Junk 5.3L (200.00) for all the covers and stuff.

GMPP or Edelbrock carb intake with MSD for spark. Should rev well and I found a 72 Camaro that this will go in with the 6 speed manual I have.
Old 05-09-2012, 09:45 AM
  #32  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Just make sure the big and small ends are both the right size. It's easy to find close to the length you need, but going to be VERY difficult to find anything in regular production with the right journal and pin size too!
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 05-09-2012, 12:27 PM
  #33  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
Just make sure the big and small ends are both the right size. It's easy to find close to the length you need, but going to be VERY difficult to find anything in regular production with the right journal and pin size too!
.....

Last edited by Grendel; 05-26-2013 at 11:06 AM.
Old 05-09-2012, 12:49 PM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (21)
 
Bilster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It appears that the original intent was to build a "cheap" short stroke motor. The rods appear to be either a major expense or a weak link to an otherwise stout rotating assembly. Not to rain on your parade but wouldn't it make more sense to find a 4.8. Bore it to an LS1 bore that provides you the least expensive LS1/LS6 forged piston (Usually performance forging are hard to find for standard bores). The LS1/LS6 pistons are the proper compression height for a stock 4.8 crank and rods (3.268 stroke/6.275 rod length). Finishing the assembly with ARP rod bolts, ARP studs in the mains and heads would give you a proven tough combination.

This combination or the one NemeSS suggests is going to allow you extra money to build a valve train that can handle the rpm your going to throw at it. Think titanium. Think very expensive.
Old 05-09-2012, 03:23 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bilster
It appears that the original intent was to build a "cheap" short stroke motor. The rods appear to be either a major expense or a weak link to an otherwise stout rotating assembly. Not to rain on your parade but wouldn't it make more sense to find a 4.8. Bore it to an LS1 bore that provides you the least expensive LS1/LS6 forged piston (Usually performance forging are hard to find for standard bores). The LS1/LS6 pistons are the proper compression height for a stock 4.8 crank and rods (3.268 stroke/6.275 rod length). Finishing the assembly with ARP rod bolts, ARP studs in the mains and heads would give you a proven tough combination.

This combination or the one NemeSS suggests is going to allow you extra money to build a valve train that can handle the rpm your going to throw at it.
Really good idea, but here's what I am looking at:

.....

Last edited by Grendel; 05-26-2013 at 11:07 AM.
Old 05-09-2012, 05:58 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (21)
 
Bilster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I guess "cheap" is relative. Obviously, my interpretation of cheap is different than yours in this application. You're going to have a tidy sum tied up in this motor but if your pocket allows it, who am I to tell you different.

That being said, here is my experience. You can actually go too long on your rod to stroke ratio to where there is diminishing returns and you've got a sluggish motor on the low end. My problem with doing years of research on long rod motors is off the shelf cams are not going to work for you. There are engine dynamics involved such as increased dwell time at TDC that call for an unusual cam grind and unusual header design. Don't take my word for it. Call the tech support for a few popular cam companies. Tell them what you are proposing and ask what cam grind they suggest. I bet you'll get as many different suggestions and theories.

Here is my suggestion. Sell the pistons you have. They are for a stroker application where the compression height is actually working against you. Then purchase a stock LS2/6.0 forging with a more reasonable compression height (I believe it's 1.341). Now you can purchase off the shelf Eagle H-beams with a 6.300 length (part number CRS6300B3D) for a shade over $500. The final desired piston deck height can be easily found by milling. Check my math but I believe you'll be there with a more reasonable rod to stroke ratio.
Old 05-09-2012, 07:00 PM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
studderin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,556
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

those rods sound to good to be true. your gona run this stuff with SLP rocker, and a "hot cam" why?
Old 05-09-2012, 07:53 PM
  #38  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by studderin
those rods sound to good to be true. your gona run this stuff with SLP rocker, and a "hot cam" why?
Because I own them, and can swap them out later.
Old 05-09-2012, 08:07 PM
  #39  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Grendel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bilster
I guess "cheap" is relative. Obviously, my interpretation of cheap is different than yours in this application. You're going to have a tidy sum tied up in this motor but if your pocket allows it, who am I to tell you different.

That being said, here is my experience. You can actually go too long on your rod to stroke ratio to where there is diminishing returns and you've got a sluggish motor on the low end. My problem with doing years of research on long rod motors is off the shelf cams are not going to work for you. There are engine dynamics involved such as increased dwell time at TDC that call for an unusual cam grind and unusual header design. Don't take my word for it. Call the tech support for a few popular cam companies. Tell them what you are proposing and ask what cam grind they suggest. I bet you'll get as many different suggestions and theories.

Here is my suggestion. Sell the pistons you have. They are for a stroker application where the compression height is actually working against you. Then purchase a stock LS2/6.0 forging with a more reasonable compression height (I believe it's 1.341). Now you can purchase off the shelf Eagle H-beams with a 6.300 length (part number CRS6300B3D) for a shade over $500. The final desired piston deck height can be easily found by milling. Check my math but I believe you'll be there with a more reasonable rod to stroke ratio.

Thanks. 3K is expensive for a fully forged shortish stroke motor?

I will probably save the pistons I have and grab something different, as you suggest. Except that I already own the crank, too. Short 3.185 stroke.

Last edited by Grendel; 05-09-2012 at 09:16 PM.
Old 05-10-2012, 02:39 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (21)
 
Bilster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yup....I figured in your crank. Math goes something like this. 3.185 divided by two=1.5925 plus piston compression height (1.341)= 2.9335". Deck height on an LS motor is 9.240". 9.240" - 2.9335" give you a required rod length of 6.3065". Eagle rods I mentioned are 6.30". Should put you right where you need to be.

3K is pretty good for a forged short block. You still need a good set of heads with at least lightweight LS6 valves or better, lighter titanium valves to spin to 10K. Titanium retainers are going to be mandatory along with some premium valve springs. Custom cam for long rod to stroke ratio might be in order and an oil pan that can control that kind of rotating assembly rpm with a high quality oil pump. I'm not familiar with Summit's machined blocks but blue print machining including torque plate honing, squaring, decking will be necessary if you want this thing to live awhile. Studing the mains and probably the heads would be smart.


Quick Reply: building a cheap short stroke motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.