Cam Lobes for FI
So i guess that the questions are:
Why is one better than another?
What do our cam gurus use?
run the LS9 cam. you need a 1x sprocket, LS2 front cover, and a conversion pigtail but with all that and LS9 springs its still under $400.
GM uses it in the supercharged 6.2 ZR-1 so it should be nice in a procharged 5.7 F-Body
That cam has been around since 2006. Have there not been any lobe design advancements since then? what lobes does that cam use?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I've read that XE lobes are good. I guess that I'm trying to learn why an XE lobe would be more favorable over say an LXL or EPS lobe. What effect would going with more than 6* of overlap have?
Depending on the supporting valve-train modifications such as valve weight, rocker weight, rocker ratio, push rod diameter, push rod wall thickness and lifter type will determine how aggressive the lobes I use will be. At the same time the application itself such as the engine specifications like compression, stroke, bore, rod length, intake runner cc, exhaust runner cc, intake and exhaust valve diameter, intake manifold type, primary diameter, collector diameter.... is it a roots blower, centrifugal blower, single turbo, twin turbo or screw blower. How big is the blower, how big is the turbo(s) etc... If it's a street car whether hydraulic or solid I take into account mileage a year the customer puts on the vehicle so that they get a reasonable life out of their valve-train components, mainly valve springs.
Then depending on how much I have to compromise on all of the above will start that process all over again. So there really are no cut and dry instances where finite rules apply.
Selecting lobes for a cam are all a big compromise in the end as to what you can get away with and what needs to be accomplished. That said I don't like super aggressive lobes on hydraulic roller stuff, and reserve them for solid rollers in certain situations. They work very well when planned for and around with stout parts, but if you don't build for it and decide one day, "I'm going to use the most aggressive lobes I can, because I can" will normally end up not getting you the results you had wished for.
I know this doesn't answer specific instances, so if there is a combination in particular you have in mind don't be afraid to ask.
Depending on the supporting valve-train modifications such as valve weight, rocker weight, rocker ratio, push rod diameter, push rod wall thickness and lifter type will determine how aggressive the lobes I use will be. At the same time the application itself such as the engine specifications like compression, stroke, bore, rod length, intake runner cc, exhaust runner cc, intake and exhaust valve diameter, intake manifold type, primary diameter, collector diameter.... is it a roots blower, centrifugal blower, single turbo, twin turbo or screw blower. How big is the blower, how big is the turbo(s) etc... If it's a street car whether hydraulic or solid I take into account mileage a year the customer puts on the vehicle so that they get a reasonable life out of their valve-train components, mainly valve springs.
Then depending on how much I have to compromise on all of the above will start that process all over again. So there really are no cut and dry instances where finite rules apply.
Selecting lobes for a cam are all a big compromise in the end as to what you can get away with and what needs to be accomplished. That said I don't like super aggressive lobes on hydraulic roller stuff, and reserve them for solid rollers in certain situations. They work very well when planned for and around with stout parts, but if you don't build for it and decide one day, "I'm going to use the most aggressive lobes I can, because I can" will normally end up not getting you the results you had wished for.
I know this doesn't answer specific instances, so if there is a combination in particular you have in mind don't be afraid to ask.
I like the lsl lobes. Timing is good and controllable without over springing them.



