Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hydraulic or Solid Roller cam in a 408ci stroker?

Old 04-17-2004, 07:58 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
AmericanMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Martinez, Ca
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Question Hydraulic or Solid Roller cam in a 408ci stroker?

What are the advantages and disadvantages for hydraulic roller and solid roller cams in stroker motors? I know most stoker motors are built with hydraulic roller cams, would it be worth while to convert my 408ci iron block motor over to a solid roller? How much does it tipically cost to make the conversion?

Thanks,
Joey

Last edited by AmericanMuscle; 04-17-2004 at 08:15 PM.
Old 04-17-2004, 08:08 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (25)
 
1fstTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Some people will always say that a solid will make alot more power but I feel that with the new lobe designs on the hydro and the aggressive ramps on the hydro that we are seeing you can get just as much as a hp or close to what the solid would make. The big advantage to the solid is the bigger lift numbers that you can run and turn the rpm's where the hydro will start to have issues really past 7k. I was just faced with the same delima and I decided to go with a huge hydro cam and keep my shift pts right at 7200.
Old 04-17-2004, 11:03 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hydraulics can never approach the ramp rates possible with a solid roller camshaft. It just isn't possible.

Not to mention, a solid lets you run a large duration camshaft that actually has less seat-to-seat duration that a comparably sized hydraulic.
Old 04-18-2004, 12:35 AM
  #4  
12 Second Club
 
SapphireHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What are the negative side effects of a solid roller cam? There must be some or everyone would ditch thier hydraulic systems.
Old 04-18-2004, 12:56 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

negative: cost about an extra 2 grand, worse driveability, might need to adjust lash once every 3-6 months
Old 04-18-2004, 01:17 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup, need to adjust lash. Drivability is generally a lot better though.

Setup is expensive. Need good heads.
Old 04-18-2004, 11:58 AM
  #7  
9 Second Club
 
Nickn20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

also, it is murder on valvetrain components, springs, and lifter will need more a reqular maintenance schedule, its truly for someone that wants the most power possible, money and time is no objection.
Old 04-18-2004, 12:11 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Camaroholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Driveability worse? Ummm, no. Try running a hydraulic 250/244-109 LSA cam with a 346 at 850 RPM idle. Mine does quite nicely at 850.

Honestly, with the hydraulic cams that are out there today, I'd stick with hydraulic. The extra cost at this point is probably not worth it. Now, my heads aren't the greatest in the world, so mine doesn't make "huge power". But there are good-headed heads/cam cars out there making similar numbers.

Max out effort? If ya got the extra grand or 2 to spend, sure, why not. But there's no overwhelming reason to do it, IMO.

Adjusting valves every 3-6 months is no big deal to me.
Old 04-18-2004, 05:27 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Might be better off going hyd and puting the extra 2 thousand in heads.
Old 04-18-2004, 09:22 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LOnSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

As mentioned above,, the parts get expensive going to a solid roller setup. If you're not racing it, stick with hydraulic.
Old 04-18-2004, 09:51 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
FASTONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Foley, Alabama-southern Alabama
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOnslo,what kind of cam are you running,size and make,also how big of NO shot.do you have any track times?
Old 04-19-2004, 09:30 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LOnSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FASTONE
LOnslo,what kind of cam are you running,size and make,also how big of NO shot.do you have any track times?
Cam is big. Tha's all I'm going to say until I know it works. No track times, yet, but soon.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:19 AM
  #13  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's my question: why do you need shaft rockers for a solid cam? SBC guys don't always run shafts.

If you don't need them, the new 1.75 or 1.85 ratio Comps should work fine since they're adjustable, and they're like 400 bucks, right? Add $300 lifters and a good pushrod set...and you've got your cam for little more than a hyd.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:21 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sure, you don't "have" to run shaft mount rockers....but it is really a waste of time not to. The aggressiveness of a solid places incredibly stress on the valvetrain. You have to decrease rocker arm deflection as much as possible.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:34 AM
  #15  
SSU Moderator
 
RyanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much is deflection a problem? Enough to detroy a rocker arm once a year? To cause some knock at high rpm? Valve float? If its a $4-500 difference, I wouldn't call it a waste unless you are gonna break parts.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:38 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LOnSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RyanJ
How much is deflection a problem? Enough to detroy a rocker arm once a year? To cause some knock at high rpm? Valve float? If its a $4-500 difference, I wouldn't call it a waste unless you are gonna break parts.
For a mild solid cam, I'd say you would be ok for awhile running stock style hardware. But for super aggressive high lift apps, obviously you would need top of the line valvetrain parts.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:44 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the main point is, why run a solid setup unless you're going to take advantage of it?

If you're not going to take advantage of a solid cam's ability to run supper aggressive lobes, you may as well stick to a hydraulic. It is a waste of money, time, and energy.

With a solid, you need to either do it right or do not do it. "Do or do not, there is no try."
Old 04-19-2004, 10:48 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LOnSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DenzSS
I think the main point is, why run a solid setup unless you're going to take advantage of it?

If you're not going to take advantage of a solid cam's ability to run supper aggressive lobes, you may as well stick to a hydraulic. It is a waste of money, time, and energy.

With a solid, you need to either do it right or do not do it. "Do or do not, there is no try."
Couldn't have said it better
Old 10-12-2019, 05:42 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
 
bortous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,898
Received 461 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

Damn this is an old thread.
So much has changed...
The switch is on to Low lash solid rollers
Old 10-12-2019, 10:12 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,866
Received 3,017 Likes on 2,348 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bortous
Damn this is an old thread.
So much has changed...
The switch is on to Low lash solid rollers
Catching up on a bit of ancient history, eh?
Yeah, much has changed, but so much is also the same...
Cheers mate!


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Hydraulic or Solid Roller cam in a 408ci stroker?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.