V.2 Polluter on a 111LSA Idle!
02-27-2013, 11:25 PM
#42
12 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a new idle clip with the idle set at 850rpm's versus 975rpm's in the first video...which do you guys like better? I personally like the 975rpm idle better and it will be easier to drive that way also, but some like the idle a bit slower.
I definitely like the 850 idle better, could they knock it down to 800 or would it be to low? Congrats on another powerful combo!
I definitely like the 850 idle better, could they knock it down to 800 or would it be to low? Congrats on another powerful combo!
02-28-2013, 07:04 AM
#43
Here is a new idle clip with the idle set at 850rpm's versus 975rpm's in the first video...which do you guys like better? I personally like the 975rpm idle better and it will be easier to drive that way also, but some like the idle a bit slower.
I definitely like the 850 idle better, could they knock it down to 800 or would it be to low? Congrats on another powerful combo!
I definitely like the 850 idle better, could they knock it down to 800 or would it be to low? Congrats on another powerful combo!
The car is a beast to drive. We don't really have any stretches of roads around here where we can really open it up, but just going WOT at 4000rpm in 2nd gear shifting at 7000rpm and running it up to 6000rpm in 3rd felt very nice.
03-01-2013, 08:18 AM
#44
Here is a good comparison of the two different versions we offer for the V.2 Polluter. Now the LS1 V.2 shown in this graph was installed in a 2002 Trans Am with nothing more than a SLP lid, TSP LT's, TSP TD's, stock LS6 intake/tb and the LS1 V.2(112lsa) camshaft. The LS2 V.2 shown is still the same white C6.
The graph:
The graph:
03-01-2013, 08:03 PM
#49
Launching!
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Honey Brook, Pa.
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds damn good to me!!! Dyno graph looks impressive too. As soon as I get done with taxes I'll be southbound on I-81!! Martin can you tighten the LSA any more or is that it??
03-02-2013, 12:50 PM
#50
The problem with tightening the lsa even more is it reduces p to v on the exhaust side. The exhaust side is the most likely to contact the piston as the piston chases the exhaust valve.
03-04-2013, 09:29 AM
#52
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL! I'd bet down to my last dollar you're right. I just like it because it sounds like an old school big block. Hey, I was looking at your site and I was wondering if you sell the TFS as cast 220 heads? I remember a thread you had posted in earlier and had said how a ported 220 head would out flow a 215. I have a 382 in my C5, and it has some PRC 220 heads and an off the shelf cam. It really needs a kick in the pants, I either need to put a different set of heads and a different cam in there or just ditch it and go bigger. What are your thoughts?
03-04-2013, 04:19 PM
#53
LOL! I'd bet down to my last dollar you're right. I just like it because it sounds like an old school big block. Hey, I was looking at your site and I was wondering if you sell the TFS as cast 220 heads? I remember a thread you had posted in earlier and had said how a ported 220 head would out flow a 215. I have a 382 in my C5, and it has some PRC 220 heads and an off the shelf cam. It really needs a kick in the pants, I either need to put a different set of heads and a different cam in there or just ditch it and go bigger. What are your thoughts?
Hmm, I'm a big fan of cubic inches, but I think we can make your set-up really scream! What does it put to the tire as of right now? A CNC'd 220cc intake runner will 9/10 make more power than a CNC'd 215cc cylinder head, especially on an engine with your cubic inches. I've seen 383's with TEA TFS 215 heads make 520rwhp and 480rwtq which IMO is very respectable from a 3.9" bore motor.
What are the current cam specs?
03-04-2013, 05:13 PM
#54
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After re-reading my post I really sounded like an *******, excuse my manners!
Hmm, I'm a big fan of cubic inches, but I think we can make your set-up really scream! What does it put to the tire as of right now? A CNC'd 220cc intake runner will 9/10 make more power than a CNC'd 215cc cylinder head, especially on an engine with your cubic inches. I've seen 383's with TEA TFS 215 heads make 520rwhp and 480rwtq which IMO is very respectable from a 3.9" bore motor.
What are the current cam specs?
Hmm, I'm a big fan of cubic inches, but I think we can make your set-up really scream! What does it put to the tire as of right now? A CNC'd 220cc intake runner will 9/10 make more power than a CNC'd 215cc cylinder head, especially on an engine with your cubic inches. I've seen 383's with TEA TFS 215 heads make 520rwhp and 480rwtq which IMO is very respectable from a 3.9" bore motor.
What are the current cam specs?
LMAO
03-13-2013, 01:44 PM
#59
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just got off the phone with Martin!
Thank you again for taking the time to answer my questions, can't wait to get this cam.
Well both of them......got 2 coming!
Thank you again for taking the time to answer my questions, can't wait to get this cam.
Well both of them......got 2 coming!