Which ATI damper?
From the standpoint of horsepower, the lightest and smallest one will provide for the least amount of parasitic losses. But is the 25% UD pulley less effective at damping than say a 10%? Similarly is a steel housing better than an aluminum housing in that respect? Or are differences there negligible? Trying to weigh all these parameters: material selection (weight), size, and their impact on parasitic losses and damping performance. The choice might not be ultra critical but I'd like to optimize my selection since I have the ability to do so.
I was considering PN# 917278, 10% UD made of aluminum that has a 10% UD ac pulley on the back of it. Anyone running this guy?
Thanks for any input,
Chuck
Goodyear 4040390 Gatorback Poly-V Belt
And right now I'm chasing down a squeal with my stock balancer and stock belt. I want to get that solved before putting the ATI on there.
Do you think maybe your belt tensioner or pulley could be suspect? When I was tearing my motor down, I noticed that all of the bearings in my accessory pulleys were dry. It's possible to remove the bearing seal with a pick, flush them, and repack them with grease. Might be worth a shot if it ends up not being a belt.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Also, it appears 917276 doesn't have underdrive for the AC like the y-body one does.
Last edited by spy2520; Apr 8, 2013 at 02:09 PM.
But for peak performance, the lighter weight damper with the aluminum pulley is the winner. Frees up engine hp, and is more responsive to changes in engine speed. Basically the same effect (though not as drastic) as a lightweight flywheel, but on the opposite side of the crank.
Forgive my ignorance, but is there a reason you couldn't use a y-body damper on an f-body? Are the belt spacings on the accessory drive different or something?
Last edited by ckpitt55; Apr 10, 2013 at 12:05 PM.







