Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

408 Build Thread (New numbers)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2013, 03:35 PM
  #61  
11 Second Club
 
big dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silver Spring, Md.
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingPin1094
i was shooting for around 500rwhp which i thought would put me at just about a 10 second car. I mean i guess what the dyno says isnt all that important if its damn near a 10 second car
Though most folks downplay the dyno, it truly is important for measuring before and after results. Because I run my car a lot, I know exactly what gains my mods have netted me. I suppose what's important is how much you enjoy what you have. For me, I wanted a car with a bit too much hp. When I've reached the point where the car "scares" me, I'll be satisfied. lol!! One thing I love about the stick cars is, they're very violent. There's nothing like being thrown back in your seat with every gear change. Plus, I love the big mph they produce.
Old 06-18-2013, 03:52 PM
  #62  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
mchicia1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

How do you know it's near a 10 second car if you haven't run it? Just by feel? Butt dyno is very inaccurate.

Any run of the mill 408/ls3 top end combo will make 500 rwhp on a dynojet. It is probably just the dyno. Mustang dynos are all over the place. Some read really low, some read really high. It is all in the config. Dynojet there is no config, so they all ready pretty close to each other.
Old 06-18-2013, 05:12 PM
  #63  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

That cam isn't too far off assuming it's on a 114 for LS3 heads. It'd work well for a 408, 4" stroke, and the LS3 heads.

The problem is LS3 heads don't like 4" or even 4.03" bore. It might be worth it to send them to Ballistic Speed and have them do their Stage 2 Port and install 2.08" valves in there. I bet you it picks up big time with that cam and kills some of the reversion and helps improve I/E flow.
Old 06-18-2013, 07:29 PM
  #64  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

We've actually seen some power losses recently with the Fast ls3 intake over a stock ls3 intake. What is the chamber size on those heads as of right now? Whats the deck height on the motor? I'd consider porting the heads (assuming they are stock unless I misread) and bringing compression up to over 11:1. Do that and throw it on a dynojet and you should be around your goal.
Old 06-19-2013, 01:30 PM
  #65  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mchicia1
How do you know it's near a 10 second car if you haven't run it? Just by feel? Butt dyno is very inaccurate.

Any run of the mill 408/ls3 top end combo will make 500 rwhp on a dynojet. It is probably just the dyno. Mustang dynos are all over the place. Some read really low, some read really high. It is all in the config. Dynojet there is no config, so they all ready pretty close to each other.
Thats what the tuner told me. I dont know, but he says he has done a couple of these cars and based on the power it reads he said it was near a 10 second car.
Originally Posted by Sales2@Texas-speed
We've actually seen some power losses recently with the Fast ls3 intake over a stock ls3 intake. What is the chamber size on those heads as of right now? Whats the deck height on the motor? I'd consider porting the heads (assuming they are stock unless I misread) and bringing compression up to over 11:1. Do that and throw it on a dynojet and you should be around your goal.
From the research ive done, i didnt think there was much of an advantage with the FAST intake to merit spending $300. The chamber size is stock they are not ported, but he did some work to make the runners smoother. I didnt want to make the already large intake runners, even larger. im not sure of the deck height, he did deck the block, but i didnt think to ask how much.
I ran a .06" headgasket to try and keep compression right around 11:1.

I have to go back to get it retuned, because there are some things i dont like, and id like to have him change that. Maybe ill ask if he can throw it on the dyno again just for ***** and giggles.
Old 06-22-2013, 07:39 PM
  #66  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I dont know if i mentioned this, but after the tune the car set a code for P101, which is a MAF code. I took it back and he said he forgot to tune the MAF tables. I didnt have them redyno it, but the car does feel faster (lose all traction shifting from 1st-2nd). Is it possible i gained some power from that or is that just me being crazy?
Old 06-23-2013, 12:25 AM
  #67  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,454
Received 901 Likes on 642 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingPin1094
I dont know if i mentioned this, but after the tune the car set a code for P101, which is a MAF code. I took it back and he said he forgot to tune the MAF tables. I didnt have them redyno it, but the car does feel faster (lose all traction shifting from 1st-2nd). Is it possible i gained some power from that or is that just me being crazy?
How in the hell can someone tune a car and not tune the MAF table? I don't know a lot about tuning but that's one of the first things you do next to the injector table.

OP I'm not bitching at you, just your tuner. LOL.
Old 06-23-2013, 07:59 AM
  #68  
ctd
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sicamous, BC
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

P101 is not the MAF table calibration

If the Mustang dyno is calibrated correctly the OP's number would easily display 500 rw on a DJ.
Old 06-24-2013, 05:32 PM
  #69  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

He is a very nice guy and is very knowledgeable. He didnt say he didnt tune the tables. He said something along the lines of, raising the threshold of the p101. Im not sure exactly what that means, but it seems healthier now. Weather permitting im going to the track friday, and ill see what kind of mph i can get out of it.
Old 07-16-2013, 09:05 PM
  #70  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Finally took it to the track. good news is it ran 12.63 at 117.5. Bad news is i now have low oil pressure (~10psi at idle) Its the first time the car has been run that hard and long. Although on two passes i did miss fourth gear.
Im hoping its something simple and inexpensive. It could be the oil pump O-ring or i read a post where the barbell dislodged itself. Or what i believe to be the most likely issue is i spun/wore a bearing.
Old 07-16-2013, 09:17 PM
  #71  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Bama99z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Muscle Shoals AL,
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KingPin1094
Finally took it to the track. good news is it ran 12.63 at 117.5. Bad news is i now have low oil pressure (~10psi at idle) Its the first time the car has been run that hard and long. Although on two passes i did miss fourth gear.
Im hoping its something simple and inexpensive. It could be the oil pump O-ring or i read a post where the barbell dislodged itself. Or what i believe to be the most likely issue is i spun/wore a bearing.
Darn, Bud that sucks been following your thread. Keep us informed on what you find. And good luck maybe it be as bad as your thinking.
Old 07-16-2013, 10:15 PM
  #72  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
96lt4c4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What was your oil pressure before? Did you center the pump on the crank when you installed it?
Old 07-17-2013, 10:02 AM
  #73  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Radiantautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea that really sux man I been reading your whole thread because Im specking out my build very similar to yours except i'm using my P/P 243 heads until I get some better. thanks for the info and pics on the oil pan as well . I may have missed it but what style Pan do you have ?

Best of luck
Old 07-17-2013, 12:16 PM
  #74  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 96lt4c4
What was your oil pressure before? Did you center the pump on the crank when you installed it?
50-60 cold 40-50 hot depending on the temperature. Im not sure what you mean by center, it can really only go on one way.
Originally Posted by Radiantautos
Yea that really sux man I been reading your whole thread because Im specking out my build very similar to yours except i'm using my P/P 243 heads until I get some better. thanks for the info and pics on the oil pan as well . I may have missed it but what style Pan do you have ?

Best of luck
Its just a stock pan from chevy racing, found it on summit.

Just drained the oil and cut open the filter, got lots of bearing material so it looks like the engine will be coming out. Ill fully disassemble it and have a machinist check the crank and the valves and make sure nothing else was hurt.
Old 07-17-2013, 01:14 PM
  #75  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bozzhawg
What oil were you using?
Mobil 1 10w-30 synthetic
Old 07-17-2013, 05:01 PM
  #76  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Radiantautos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What bearings were you using ? I didn't see them posted
Old 07-17-2013, 08:52 PM
  #77  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Radiantautos
What bearings were you using ? I didn't see them posted
They where clevites, but i dont blame the bearings at all. The accidental 3rd to second shift and the subsequent over rev is what did it.
Old 07-17-2013, 10:02 PM
  #78  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
96lt4c4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by KingPin1094
50-60 cold 40-50 hot depending on the temperature. Im not sure what you mean by center, it can really only go on one way.


Its just a stock pan from chevy racing, found it on summit.

Just drained the oil and cut open the filter, got lots of bearing material so it looks like the engine will be coming out. Ill fully disassemble it and have a machinist check the crank and the valves and make sure nothing else was hurt.
Old 07-18-2013, 12:56 PM
  #79  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 96lt4c4
No id didnt do that, i just made sure the gears were meshed and bolted it on.
Old 07-19-2013, 06:35 PM
  #80  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
KingPin1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well got it out and disassembled this morning before work. Main bearings 2 and 4 were worn pretty bad, and 3 wasnt much better. The other 2 were not too bad. It looks to me like they were starved for oil and burnt up. Im not really sure how they would get starved for oil though, and just those 2 in particular. I havent pulled the cam yet to check those bearings, but id imagine they may need replacing as well. Can anyone shed some light on this for me?


Quick Reply: 408 Build Thread (New numbers)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.