236/236 .590/.590 112 help
06-17-2013, 11:30 AM
#2
TECH Senior Member
On paper it shouldn't. What is the advance in the grind?
It has a bit of a late IVC for stock compression to my taste (even at 108 ICL). With proper intake it should make healthy power mid to upper rpms.
It has a bit of a late IVC for stock compression to my taste (even at 108 ICL). With proper intake it should make healthy power mid to upper rpms.
06-17-2013, 07:20 PM
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=PREDATOR-Z;17481432]On paper it shouldn't. What is the advance in the grind?
It has a bit of a late IVC for stock compression to my taste (even at 108 ICL). With proper intake it should make healthy power mid to upper rpms.[/QUOTE
No timing advance. You think some 5.3 stage 2.5 heads work better? Ive been looking at texas speed for some heads.
It has a bit of a late IVC for stock compression to my taste (even at 108 ICL). With proper intake it should make healthy power mid to upper rpms.[/QUOTE
No timing advance. You think some 5.3 stage 2.5 heads work better? Ive been looking at texas speed for some heads.
06-19-2013, 02:00 PM
#6
[QUOTE=Palomows6;17482455] That would be pretty tight PTV with 5.3 heads depending on valve size, milling and gasket thickness...would definitely check it.
On paper it shouldn't. What is the advance in the grind?
It has a bit of a late IVC for stock compression to my taste (even at 108 ICL). With proper intake it should make healthy power mid to upper rpms.[/QUOTE
No timing advance. You think some 5.3 stage 2.5 heads work better? Ive been looking at texas speed for some heads.
It has a bit of a late IVC for stock compression to my taste (even at 108 ICL). With proper intake it should make healthy power mid to upper rpms.[/QUOTE
No timing advance. You think some 5.3 stage 2.5 heads work better? Ive been looking at texas speed for some heads.
