Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

need help choosing a crank for lq9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2013, 06:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mannyman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hawthorne CA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default need help choosing a crank for lq9

So I had my mind set on a 4 inch crank. A builder suggested a 4.125, but I guess he corrected himself and said that the 4.125 is to big for the iron block since the deck is shorter. Then he suggested a 4.100. What should I do? Im looking in to the callies forge cranks

4.000 or 4.100?

I know a 4.000 will make it a 408 with 4.030 what would a 4.100 make it with a 4.030 bore?
Old 06-18-2013, 01:50 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mannyman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hawthorne CA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Bump bump
Old 06-18-2013, 05:40 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I agree with your initial choice. I try to keep my motors square.
Old 06-18-2013, 05:47 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (83)
 
Gray86hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Battle Creek Mi
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Callies 4.000 you will have minor clearance issues but with more stroke you will have to do a lot more clearancing.

Tim
Old 06-18-2013, 06:53 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Old Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 5,640
Received 70 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

"the 4.125 is to big for the iron block since the deck is shorter. " Shorter than what???
Old 06-18-2013, 09:00 AM
  #6  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Old Geezer
"the 4.125 is to big for the iron block since the deck is shorter. " Shorter than what???
The iron blocks have the shortest sleeve length and its said the deck is .010" shorter than the aluminum blocks (9.230" vs 9.240").
Old 06-18-2013, 07:50 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mannyman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hawthorne CA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So my best bet would be to stick with the 4 inch crank? I also noticed that callies I beams dont come in 6.098 rods. According to him thats what I need to run this 4.100. I went a head and ordered the callies 4.100. Should I cancel and get the 4.000?
Old 06-18-2013, 07:51 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
mannyman84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hawthorne CA
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Honestly thats what I wanted originally. Callies 4.000 and callies I beam 6.125 rod
Old 06-19-2013, 05:02 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Do the 4.000" crank. I did and all my rod bolts cleared the cylinder sleeves by 0.060" or so on my iron block. The only thing I had to space/clearance is my windage tray (running truck oil pan also).

With the 4.100" crank you will have to remove material all over the inside of that block to make it clear. Not saying it can't be done, however the pistons will also wear faster because they come out of the bottom of the cylinder further.

Here is a pic of how far my pistons come out with 4" crank and 6.125" rods:




Quick Reply: need help choosing a crank for lq9



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.