Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

need help choosing a crank for lq9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2013 | 06:23 PM
  #1  
mannyman84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Hawthorne CA
Default need help choosing a crank for lq9

So I had my mind set on a 4 inch crank. A builder suggested a 4.125, but I guess he corrected himself and said that the 4.125 is to big for the iron block since the deck is shorter. Then he suggested a 4.100. What should I do? Im looking in to the callies forge cranks

4.000 or 4.100?

I know a 4.000 will make it a 408 with 4.030 what would a 4.100 make it with a 4.030 bore?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 01:50 AM
  #2  
mannyman84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Hawthorne CA
Default

Bump bump
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 05:40 AM
  #3  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

I agree with your initial choice. I try to keep my motors square.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 05:47 AM
  #4  
Gray86hatch's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 4
From: Battle Creek Mi
Default

Callies 4.000 you will have minor clearance issues but with more stroke you will have to do a lot more clearancing.

Tim
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 06:53 AM
  #5  
Old Geezer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 71
From: GA, USA
Default

"the 4.125 is to big for the iron block since the deck is shorter. " Shorter than what???
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 09:00 AM
  #6  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Old Geezer
"the 4.125 is to big for the iron block since the deck is shorter. " Shorter than what???
The iron blocks have the shortest sleeve length and its said the deck is .010" shorter than the aluminum blocks (9.230" vs 9.240").
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 07:50 PM
  #7  
mannyman84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Hawthorne CA
Default

So my best bet would be to stick with the 4 inch crank? I also noticed that callies I beams dont come in 6.098 rods. According to him thats what I need to run this 4.100. I went a head and ordered the callies 4.100. Should I cancel and get the 4.000?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2013 | 07:51 PM
  #8  
mannyman84's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Hawthorne CA
Default

Honestly thats what I wanted originally. Callies 4.000 and callies I beam 6.125 rod
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 05:02 AM
  #9  
RezinTexas's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 8
From: Katy, TX
Default

Do the 4.000" crank. I did and all my rod bolts cleared the cylinder sleeves by 0.060" or so on my iron block. The only thing I had to space/clearance is my windage tray (running truck oil pan also).

With the 4.100" crank you will have to remove material all over the inside of that block to make it clear. Not saying it can't be done, however the pistons will also wear faster because they come out of the bottom of the cylinder further.

Here is a pic of how far my pistons come out with 4" crank and 6.125" rods:

Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.