317 heads + 2.08V on 5.3?
#2
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
Why would you want to? If it even fits in the cylinder without the valve hitting, it would be so shrouded it wouldn't help any anyways. I could see you losing a good bit of power vs the same heads with a stock sized valve.
Not to mention your will have to mill the heads so much to even get a respectable compression ratio on a 5.3, that it would further amplify the shrouding problem.
Not to mention your will have to mill the heads so much to even get a respectable compression ratio on a 5.3, that it would further amplify the shrouding problem.
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
It could work, but as already mentioned it probably isn't a great idea. The compression will be low and the intake valve will be jammed up against the cylinder wall pretty tightly, it may even contact when the engine is running. There's way to work around it all, but its more expensive than just getting a more appropriately sized head in the first place.
#4
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Didn't realize you could squeeze 2.08 valves into 317 heads. On a 5.3 motor, about the max valve size is 2.02. Anything bigger causes major shrouding problems (assuming it'll even fit).
Last edited by batboy; 07-27-2013 at 12:03 PM.