Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

400hp build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2013, 05:07 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 400hp build

Hey guys, so I have a 2001 silverado. Reg cab shortbed stepside. Right now it has a 5.3l in it has headers exh. And a box tune. Im looking to either pick up another 5.3 or 6.0 which ever I can get my hands on first for cheap. Looking to make 400-450hp at the flywheel. Its a daily driver. So not looking for anything much more than that.

I will either be buying the prc stage 2.5 heads. Or doing a custom port/polish on the stock heads. A mild cam. Something that I can still tow a small boat with. How reasonable is this? And should I go with a forged assembly or will a new stock assembly stay strong for that hp range? This is a budget build. But I dont really have a budget yet. I plan on just buying the block, and slowly piecing this together. Im not in any rush. Would this be a reasonable thing to build for lets say around 3k. With buying a new block? I will reuse all the accessories from my 5.3. So it can be a bare block. Head cam package is about 1500-1800. Stock rebuild kits about 700. Thats 2500. And about 500-700 for a block from a junkyard. So about 3k is what im expecting. I will do all work myself. Unless machine work is needed. I dont want to go FI. I know I could hit my 400hp mark easily with it but theres just something about the scream of a NA motor that I cant stay away from. Haha. Thanks for the advice guys. Im in southern california. If anyome has a 6.0 bare block or a 5.3/4.8 as well.
Old 11-21-2013, 08:47 AM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
rhino200099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

243 heads and a cam on your block should get you to the 400hp fhp or damn close to it.
Old 11-21-2013, 12:01 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rhino200099
243 heads and a cam on your block should get you to the 400hp fhp or damn close to it.
Would it be better to just go with the prc heads or are the 243 heads better?
Old 11-21-2013, 12:26 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can someone tell me how to figure out compression ratio. Been trying to find out how combustion chanber affects CR. I cant find it. The 243 have a 64.5 combustion chamber. The 806 heads. Have a 61. Will that bumb up or lower compression? If anyone has a formula id appreciate that so I can compare different heads and go from there. Thanks guys.
Old 11-21-2013, 12:38 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
baronsmith98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Google wallace racing calculators and they have the formulas on there. As far as the forged rotating assembly that is probably overkill for the power range you are looking for and it isnt budget friendly. A smaller combustion chamber will increase compression.
Old 11-21-2013, 12:39 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
97camaro383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silverado2469
Can someone tell me how to figure out compression ratio. Been trying to find out how combustion chanber affects CR. I cant find it. The 243 have a 64.5 combustion chamber. The 806 heads. Have a 61. Will that bumb up or lower compression? If anyone has a formula id appreciate that so I can compare different heads and go from there. Thanks guys.
The smaller CC will raise the compression. I had my 243s milled to 62cc to raise compression
Old 11-21-2013, 02:34 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by baronsmith98
Google wallace racing calculators and they have the formulas on there. As far as the forged rotating assembly that is probably overkill for the power range you are looking for and it isnt budget friendly. A smaller combustion chamber will increase compression.
Okay thats what I thought it was. The smaller the CC the higher CR. Whats a good compression ratio to stay at for a street motor? 91 octane only. I was thinking no more than like 10.5:1? Would I be able to hit 400hp with the 243 if I didnt mill them?
Old 11-21-2013, 03:24 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
 
FormulaTA327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond,VA
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wondering the same thing
Old 11-21-2013, 03:34 PM
  #9  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
rhino200099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i didtn know it was that big of a diffrence so yeah you would need to mill them or you could just port and polish the heads you have and put bigger valces in them.
Old 11-21-2013, 03:46 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Okay ill just end up getting the stage 2.5 5.3l heads. Bigger valves, ported polished, etc etc. And either a comp 218/220 cam. Or the tr220. Staying with the stock converter. After doing a lot of research. I found a modern mouse build. In a magazine. They got 415hp out of it with a 212/218 cam and a set of 2.5 heads. So I think 450 is reasonable with the bigger cam.

So next question. I found a block on ebay. 199$ plus shipping. Waiting for a shipping quote.

Its a bare block. I found a rebuild kit for the 5.3 for 600. Comes with pistons, rings, gaskets. And a few other parts. I would need connecting rods. Should I stay woth the 6.1 rods. Or is there a benifit to going with lets say a 5.7. Or 6.0 connecting rod? Does the coneecting rod length affect clearance, CR or anything else? Ive read the longer the rod. The more torque you make? I figure ill just stay with the stock rod length so I dont have to get to complicated for my first build. But I found forged pistons for 500. And forged I beam rods for 300. But the rods are 5.7" not 6.1. What do you guys think?
Old 11-21-2013, 07:46 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

stock cast ls assemblies will handle 500 hp .how many miles on your current 5.3 ? it is better to buy a rotating assembly as a whole kit .don't use 5.7 rods in a ls .a texas speed 224r cam with a 114 lsa will work with a stock stall .the cam you are looking at in a 5.3 with ported heads mite not 450 fwhp.consider a cam from Tick performance or EPS ,they have great lobe designs to make good power .check Texas Speed for rotating prices .
Old 11-21-2013, 09:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Always2Slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

For what you want to do its ridiculously easy to do on the cheap. If you start out with a 6.0 you will have more torque for towing. I would spend more on the bottom end in getting the 6.0 block then I would a fancy set of heads. I would then grab a set of 243 heads and get a valve job and have it blended in at the very least. You could then grab a cam in the range of 218 to 224 that will make all the power your looking for with the driving characteristics you after in towing. You don't need any special or fancy lobes to do this with either. You can even use an LS6 cam with the 6.0 and make over 400 FWHP with a set of 918 springs or similar and have a very long last valve train.
Old 11-22-2013, 02:30 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
 
cobalt964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

243 heads, ls2 cam and springs, and a tune. 400ish., maybe a bit more. go to carcraft.com and read their 5.3 cam only dyno specs. they tested a bone stock 5.3 with a bunch of diff cams.
Old 11-22-2013, 06:12 AM
  #14  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
stock cast ls assemblies will handle 500 hp .how many miles on your current 5.3 ? it is better to buy a rotating assembly as a whole kit .don't use 5.7 rods in a ls .a texas speed 224r cam with a 114 lsa will work with a stock stall .the cam you are looking at in a 5.3 with ported heads mite not 450 fwhp.consider a cam from Tick performance or EPS ,they have great lobe designs to make good power .check Texas Speed for rotating prices .
Theres 158k on my 5.3 now. Im buying a new block just so the truck doesnt have to be down. Its my only vehicle. Besides my bike. So im gonna build the motor. Then do the swap. Should tske me one day to swap motors. And then get it tuned the mext day. Down time one weekend. No loss of work haha. Thanks for the help guys. Im gonna really try and find a 6.0l. To start with. Will be a lot easier to do what I want.
Old 11-22-2013, 11:46 AM
  #15  
Teching In
 
schreurs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Honestly I wouldn't even start with a bare block. Find a good solid used 5.3 or 6.0 at the junkyard and do your head, cam, and intake swap and you'll have and 400hp motor for a lot less. Search around the yard for one that's been well cared for and you wont even need to rebuild it. Ive had two 5.3s opened up, one with 246k and one with 215k and they look brand new inside. JMO
Old 11-22-2013, 12:07 PM
  #16  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by schreurs1
Honestly I wouldn't even start with a bare block. Find a good solid used 5.3 or 6.0 at the junkyard and do your head, cam, and intake swap and you'll have and 400hp motor for a lot less. Search around the yard for one that's been well cared for and you wont even need to rebuild it. Ive had two 5.3s opened up, one with 246k and one with 215k and they look brand new inside. JMO
Right on. Ill have to go to a junkyard and see about picking up a 6.0
Old 11-22-2013, 01:20 PM
  #17  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,894
Received 693 Likes on 512 Posts

Default

Or.. just run a cheap $250 GT45 turbo on a totally stock setup. You'll make more power than all of the options above for around the price of heads and a cam.

IMO a 6.0 is overkill and then some for 400 crank hp.

Looks like a stock cam only 5.3 should be able to break the 400hp mark pretty easily too...

224/232 crane cam and springs made 440 crank hp. The LS9 cam that I run (Under $100 new with $60 springs) made over 420chp.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...mparisons.html

Last edited by Forcefed86; 11-22-2013 at 01:29 PM.
Old 11-22-2013, 01:58 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Silverado2469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Or.. just run a cheap $250 GT45 turbo on a totally stock setup. You'll make more power than all of the options above for around the price of heads and a cam.

IMO a 6.0 is overkill and then some for 400 crank hp.

Looks like a stock cam only 5.3 should be able to break the 400hp mark pretty easily too...

224/232 crane cam and springs made 440 crank hp. The LS9 cam that I run (Under $100 new with $60 springs) made over 420chp.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...mparisons.html

I was really tempted to build a rear mount turbo. But decided that I wanted to learn more about building a motor. Before I through on a turbo. But that is still an option I guess. But with 160k on my motor. I would rebuild it before I through a turbo on it. So I might as well build this more. Put the comp 216/220 cam in it. With a set of heads. On a 6.0 that dynod at 460/430. I think according to a magazine article I read. So in a 5.3. Maybe like 430/390? Thats a very mild cam. And made 345ftlbs at 2000 rpm so I could still tow and have a streetable truck with a stock converter.
Old 11-22-2013, 02:12 PM
  #19  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,894
Received 693 Likes on 512 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silverado2469
I was really tempted to build a rear mount turbo. But decided that I wanted to learn more about building a motor. Before I through on a turbo. But that is still an option I guess. But with 160k on my motor. I would rebuild it before I through a turbo on it. So I might as well build this more. Put the comp 216/220 cam in it. With a set of heads. On a 6.0 that dynod at 460/430. I think according to a magazine article I read. So in a 5.3. Maybe like 430/390? Thats a very mild cam. And made 345ftlbs at 2000 rpm so I could still tow and have a streetable truck with a stock converter.
I disagree. 160k is barely broken in from what I've seen on these motors and a great place to start when adding a turbo. My 5.3 had over 160k on it and looked great. I reused the original bearings/rings etc and ran it all year at the 800+ crank hp mark. All OEM hardware etc. I believe reusing the original timing chain was a bad idea however and what lead to it's failure at the end of the year.

The old K.I.S.S. method applies here. Absolutely no reason to "build a motor" if your HP goals are 600whp and below these days. If the motor craps out... buy another stock JY motor and throw it in. Save your money for fuel management and a decent transmission. Even the early 4.8's in stock form will make 600+ easily on the OEM longblocks.
Old 11-22-2013, 03:23 PM
  #20  
Teching In
 
schreurs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Absolutely no reason to "build a motor" if your HP goals are 600whp and below these days. If the motor craps out... buy another stock JY motor and throw it in.
Yahtzee!

That's the theory I am going off of. If you want peace of mind, get rod bolts and head bolts and give 'er hell.


Quick Reply: 400hp build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.