Cam/Valve Spring Recommendations for LS1 w/243 Heads
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cam/Valve Spring Recommendations for LS1 w/243 Heads
I've done some searching and read the technical threads. I'm a Mechanical Engineer and I'm not afraid to say I don't understand most of it well enough to make this decision on my own.
The car is my DD. So I'm just looking to open her up, keeping a smooth ride/idle not drastically dropping my mpg, while still having enough torque to have improve throttle response on the street and enough horsepower gain to improve the top end. If this combination is possible.
I'm thinking the goal is 500 rwhp +- 25 rwhp. (If I'm not going to get the ride I want at that power, please let me know.)
My Setup
02 Trans Am WS6 w/LS1 mostly stock
Kook 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers withOUT Cats and Y Pipe
Voolant Cold Air Intake
Stock LS6 Intake - Emissions crap has been removed
I intend to upgrade to the Fast 92mm within the next year.
I just picked a set of low mileage 243s off of a vet w/ new LS2 Valves
I still need to get them to the machine shop to be looked over, cleaned, milled, and maybe a light hand port. Any advise on milling and porting would be appreciated! (I understand most benefits of porting are at high RPMs. That's about it.)
Obviously I intend to change the cam and add the springs when I change the heads.
I'll be installing new LS7 lifters during this and intend to upgrade my stock lifters with the comp cam trunion upgrade.
I called comp and asked for their advise. I appreciate the advise the guy gave, while it was probably great advise it seemed like he was reading off of a sales sheet and had no experience with LS Engines. Which is why I'm here, I'd really like some advice from you guys who play with LS engines and/or have ran my setup.
This is what he suggested.
extreme 269
54-414-11
XFI™ RPM, XR269HR Great Mid-Range w/ Superior Top End Power, Needs Computer Modifications
With
valve springs
26915
GM LS Beehive™ Valve Spring Kit
The car is my DD. So I'm just looking to open her up, keeping a smooth ride/idle not drastically dropping my mpg, while still having enough torque to have improve throttle response on the street and enough horsepower gain to improve the top end. If this combination is possible.
I'm thinking the goal is 500 rwhp +- 25 rwhp. (If I'm not going to get the ride I want at that power, please let me know.)
My Setup
02 Trans Am WS6 w/LS1 mostly stock
Kook 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers withOUT Cats and Y Pipe
Voolant Cold Air Intake
Stock LS6 Intake - Emissions crap has been removed
I intend to upgrade to the Fast 92mm within the next year.
I just picked a set of low mileage 243s off of a vet w/ new LS2 Valves
I still need to get them to the machine shop to be looked over, cleaned, milled, and maybe a light hand port. Any advise on milling and porting would be appreciated! (I understand most benefits of porting are at high RPMs. That's about it.)
Obviously I intend to change the cam and add the springs when I change the heads.
I'll be installing new LS7 lifters during this and intend to upgrade my stock lifters with the comp cam trunion upgrade.
I called comp and asked for their advise. I appreciate the advise the guy gave, while it was probably great advise it seemed like he was reading off of a sales sheet and had no experience with LS Engines. Which is why I'm here, I'd really like some advice from you guys who play with LS engines and/or have ran my setup.
This is what he suggested.
extreme 269
54-414-11
XFI™ RPM, XR269HR Great Mid-Range w/ Superior Top End Power, Needs Computer Modifications
With
valve springs
26915
GM LS Beehive™ Valve Spring Kit
Last edited by CORYSTA; 11-16-2014 at 11:00 PM.
#2
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That setup will not get you close to 500whp.
Your going to need:
a set of CNC ported Trick Flow or AFR 215cc heads with lightweight valves
Pac 1204x springs titanium retainers
11/32 push rods
I would go at least to a morel 5315 lifter. Johnson short travel would be better for high rpm
Ported Fast 92/102
Camshaft is going to need to be in the 234/242 range
Compression will need to be close to 12:1
1 7/8 headers feeding into a true dual exhaust
Electric water pump
The setup you have listed is probably good for 420-430whp.
Your going to need:
a set of CNC ported Trick Flow or AFR 215cc heads with lightweight valves
Pac 1204x springs titanium retainers
11/32 push rods
I would go at least to a morel 5315 lifter. Johnson short travel would be better for high rpm
Ported Fast 92/102
Camshaft is going to need to be in the 234/242 range
Compression will need to be close to 12:1
1 7/8 headers feeding into a true dual exhaust
Electric water pump
The setup you have listed is probably good for 420-430whp.
#3
If you truly want a strong setup without the radical sound of a cam, then your best bet would be to invest in a good set of heads and a "baby" cam. Advanced Induction and TEA do excellent work to stock GM castings.
#4
TECH Fanatic
I'd make that the last time I ever call Comp Cams tech support, I know you want to keep things tame for better drive ability but that cam is tiny. Also how good of numbers your car makes and how it performs can sometimes be about the details and not so much the big parts like the best heads and intake. Thats not to say you don't need great heads ,a FAST 102, and a 23x/ 24x cam to hit 500 hp with a 5.7. But sometimes a car has all of those parts and still only makes ~450 hp on the same dyno that a car with budget CNC'd 243's, a 22x /23x cam and a LS6 intake put down 440 hp earlier that week. You already have good headers but unless that y pipe has a 3.5-4 inch merge to go with a matching i pipe and cut-out it's going to be holding you back. Also I'd consider getting rid of that Volant intake and putting on a lid and SSRA or Chris 1313 ram air on instead, along with either a 85mm MAF or no MAF and a SD tune. You still might only hit 425 hp but that really just depends on the dyno.
One more important thing is you car a A4 or M6.
One more important thing is you car a A4 or M6.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
IMO for what you want a more realistic goal is in the 400-430 rwhp range since it sounds like you want to keep the engine very DD friendly and somewhat smooth running. First. I'd go with the best heads you can afford and not necessarily the most expensive, and get the SCR up into the 11:1 to 11.5:1 range. For cams you'll want to be a little conservative on cam size to keep it DD friendly, so I would definitely keep the intake duration on the cam under 230*(probably under 228*) and go with enough lift (.590"-.620" range) to make the most of the flow of the heads. I'd also run at least a FAST 92 intake, and at least 3.90 rear gears.
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the advise! So it sounds like y'all don't think these 243 heads will give me much of an increase. Is there anything I can do to them?
Oh I also forgot to mention I've got a monster stage 3 clutch, billet flywheel installed. For me it was the perfect compromise from the factory drive to not getting to aggressive. Not the same thing here, but I thought it a good explanation of what I'm looking for here.
I don't mind a more aggressive drive. I just worry about it in heavy traffic and my gf being able to drive the car. She's a good driver in an automatic and does fairly well working the clutch and stick for very little experience, but somehow the fundamentals of driving go completely out the window when she drives the trans am. Anyone else seen this problem? haha
Oh I also forgot to mention I've got a monster stage 3 clutch, billet flywheel installed. For me it was the perfect compromise from the factory drive to not getting to aggressive. Not the same thing here, but I thought it a good explanation of what I'm looking for here.
I don't mind a more aggressive drive. I just worry about it in heavy traffic and my gf being able to drive the car. She's a good driver in an automatic and does fairly well working the clutch and stick for very little experience, but somehow the fundamentals of driving go completely out the window when she drives the trans am. Anyone else seen this problem? haha
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The budget isn't very high. So I guess I need to find a good machine shop to work on these heads. How much do I need to get milled off in order to get to the 11.1 to 11.5 compression range.
#12
TECH Fanatic
Define not very high, just doing a head and cam swap the right way cost around $1400. Then you still need to spend ~$500 on a tune and will likely need to spend $2-300 on bigger injectors. It all adds up pretty fast.
#13
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Thanks for the advise! So it sounds like y'all don't think these 243 heads will give me much of an increase. Is there anything I can do to them?
Oh I also forgot to mention I've got a monster stage 3 clutch, billet flywheel installed. For me it was the perfect compromise from the factory drive to not getting to aggressive. Not the same thing here, but I thought it a good explanation of what I'm looking for here.
I don't mind a more aggressive drive. I just worry about it in heavy traffic and my gf being able to drive the car. She's a good driver in an automatic and does fairly well working the clutch and stick for very little experience, but somehow the fundamentals of driving go completely out the window when she drives the trans am. Anyone else seen this problem? haha
Oh I also forgot to mention I've got a monster stage 3 clutch, billet flywheel installed. For me it was the perfect compromise from the factory drive to not getting to aggressive. Not the same thing here, but I thought it a good explanation of what I'm looking for here.
I don't mind a more aggressive drive. I just worry about it in heavy traffic and my gf being able to drive the car. She's a good driver in an automatic and does fairly well working the clutch and stick for very little experience, but somehow the fundamentals of driving go completely out the window when she drives the trans am. Anyone else seen this problem? haha
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
That's not a problem, it's a solution to a issue as old as hot rodding itself, WAF. Also known as Wife Approval Factor. When my car is on jack stands in the back yard for months at a time the wife starts nagging me to sell it. When I finish whatever I was doing and it's drive-able again, I get her to take it down the road. She gets that big grin, same as we get, and the nag turns to nuzzle !
#15
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm a pretty patient. If I have to spend more and keep collecting the parts until the end of next summer, that's what I'll do. However, I'm not willing to be $3k into this mod. That cuts to far into my guns and ammo budget. haha
I was thinking about replacing the injectors with FAST when I added the intake. However, my mechanic was telling me that my stock injectors where fine for my moderate goals.
#16
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So I think I'm beginning to understand the spanish.
So when y'all talk Cam size, y'all are talking "Duration @ .050", not advertised, correct?
What I don't understand is the correlation to x/y. There's x=y, x>y, and x<y. Which do I want for my goals?
Thanks!
So when y'all talk Cam size, y'all are talking "Duration @ .050", not advertised, correct?
What I don't understand is the correlation to x/y. There's x=y, x>y, and x<y. Which do I want for my goals?
Thanks!
#17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Kinglt-1. So I didn't include the intake setup in the budget I was talking. I don't plan to do that until after the heads and cam have been done. That and I'm hoping to find a used 92mm Fast, to save some money. With the ability to replace the runners on the Fast, I see no reason not to buy a used one.
I don't intend to run Ti retainers. As an engineer I have an inherent distrust for Ti, in any system that takes repeated "impacts". With Steel you get bend before break. There's very little to no bend before the break with Ti.
I've contacted TEA for a quote.
I don't intend to run Ti retainers. As an engineer I have an inherent distrust for Ti, in any system that takes repeated "impacts". With Steel you get bend before break. There's very little to no bend before the break with Ti.
I've contacted TEA for a quote.
Last edited by CORYSTA; 11-14-2014 at 11:05 AM.
#18
TECH Fanatic
I know Brian Tooley has commented on the durability of his Ti retainers and has never had one brake. I'd trust any part he puts his name on he's been in the game sense the early 90's.
If you have those heads ported you're going to be $3k into it no way around it unless you start cutting corners, then you start risking reliability and run the risk of ruining the whole motor. Your also very likely to need bigger injectors, it's around 400 rwhp that stock ones max out and your going to be pushing that number. In the long run it would be cheaper to put a FAST 92 on with the heads and cam so you don't have to pay for 2 tunes. Upgrading injectors right away is the same way, if you max out the injectors and have to go back for a second tune you're going to be paying twice. It's always cheaper to do it right the first time.
One more thing ARP head studs are over priced and over kill for any NA application, and also distort the bores in a different way than head bolts possibly affecting ring seal. Stick to either GM of ARP head bolts, leave the studs for the FI and big n2o guys.
Well I'm into a set of heads/valves, arp studs, new LS7 lifters and gm gaskets at $650. I'd like to be into the rest of the heads/cam mod for less than another $1k.
I'm a pretty patient. If I have to spend more and keep collecting the parts until the end of next summer, that's what I'll do. However, I'm not willing to be $3k into this mod. That cuts to far into my guns and ammo budget. haha
I was thinking about replacing the injectors with FAST when I added the intake. However, my mechanic was telling me that my stock injectors where fine for my moderate goals.
I'm a pretty patient. If I have to spend more and keep collecting the parts until the end of next summer, that's what I'll do. However, I'm not willing to be $3k into this mod. That cuts to far into my guns and ammo budget. haha
I was thinking about replacing the injectors with FAST when I added the intake. However, my mechanic was telling me that my stock injectors where fine for my moderate goals.
One more thing ARP head studs are over priced and over kill for any NA application, and also distort the bores in a different way than head bolts possibly affecting ring seal. Stick to either GM of ARP head bolts, leave the studs for the FI and big n2o guys.
#19
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't mean to infer that I thought the Ti retainers would break. I'm sure they've been engineered well. However, for my peace of mind I'm going to opt out of it.
This is beginning to look like an expensive long drawn out project.
Injectors what do I need?
This is beginning to look like an expensive long drawn out project.
Injectors what do I need?
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
BTW, nothing wrong with using the gm 243 heads, just have then professionally CNC ported and milled .
IMO, A.I. or TEA would be a good choice.
Last edited by 99Bluz28; 11-14-2014 at 02:21 PM.